Difference between revisions of "Seal and hydrocarbon yield estimates"
(Initial import) |
Cwhitehurst (talk | contribs) m (added Category:Treatise Handbook 3 using HotCat) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| part = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps | | part = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps | ||
| chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal | | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal | ||
| − | | frompg = 10- | + | | frompg = 10-39 |
| − | | topg = 10- | + | | topg = 10-39 |
| author = Grant M. Skerlec | | author = Grant M. Skerlec | ||
| link = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch10/ch10.htm | | link = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch10/ch10.htm | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Calibration factor== | ==Calibration factor== | ||
| − | Hydrocarbon yield models estimate the volume of hydrocarbons that can be generated from a given volume of [[source rock]] and thermal history. These calculations are commonly calibrated by comparing the volume of hydrocarbons that should have been generated in a drainage area with the volume actually trapped. This “calibration factor” then is used routinely in yield estimates. | + | Hydrocarbon yield models estimate the [[Calculating charge volume|volume of hydrocarbons]] that can be generated from a given volume of [[source rock]] and [[thermal history]]. These calculations are commonly calibrated by comparing the volume of hydrocarbons that should have been generated in a drainage area with the volume actually trapped. This “calibration factor” then is used routinely in yield estimates. |
==Potential errors== | ==Potential errors== | ||
| − | The logical error in many of these yield calibration studies is assuming that the hydrocarbon volume trapped is the total volume that migrated into the trap. If the trap contains a fault-dependent leak point, however, the volume that migrated in may have been much greater than the volume now trapped. The additional hydrocarbons spilled across a fault-dependent leak point and migrated updip. If these fault-dependent leak points are not identified and we assume the trap contains all the hydrocarbons generated in the source kitchen, then calibration factors and yield estimates can be extremely misleading. In addition, hydrocarbons may spill from adjacent traps rather than being directly derived from source kitchens. | + | The logical error in many of these yield calibration studies is assuming that the hydrocarbon volume trapped is the total volume that [[Migration|migrated]] into the [[trap]]. If the trap contains a [[Fault-dependent leak points, continuity, and charge|fault-dependent leak point]], however, the volume that migrated in may have been much greater than the volume now trapped. The additional hydrocarbons spilled across a fault-dependent leak point and migrated updip. If these fault-dependent leak points are not identified and we assume the trap contains all the hydrocarbons generated in the source [[kitchen]], then calibration factors and yield estimates can be extremely misleading. In addition, hydrocarbons may spill from adjacent traps rather than being directly derived from source kitchens. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]] | [[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]] | ||
[[Category:Evaluating top and fault seal]] | [[Category:Evaluating top and fault seal]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Treatise Handbook 3]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:20, 29 March 2022
| Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps | |
| |
| Series | Treatise in Petroleum Geology |
|---|---|
| Part | Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps |
| Chapter | Evaluating top and fault seal |
| Author | Grant M. Skerlec |
| Link | Web page |
| Store | AAPG Store |
Calibration factor
Hydrocarbon yield models estimate the volume of hydrocarbons that can be generated from a given volume of source rock and thermal history. These calculations are commonly calibrated by comparing the volume of hydrocarbons that should have been generated in a drainage area with the volume actually trapped. This “calibration factor” then is used routinely in yield estimates.
Potential errors
The logical error in many of these yield calibration studies is assuming that the hydrocarbon volume trapped is the total volume that migrated into the trap. If the trap contains a fault-dependent leak point, however, the volume that migrated in may have been much greater than the volume now trapped. The additional hydrocarbons spilled across a fault-dependent leak point and migrated updip. If these fault-dependent leak points are not identified and we assume the trap contains all the hydrocarbons generated in the source kitchen, then calibration factors and yield estimates can be extremely misleading. In addition, hydrocarbons may spill from adjacent traps rather than being directly derived from source kitchens.
See also
- Fault seal and migration pathways
- How faults control trap fill and migration pathways
- How to construct migration pathway maps
External links
| find literature about Seal and hydrocarbon yield estimates |
|
|
|
|