Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:  
  | part    = Critical elements of the petroleum system
 
  | part    = Critical elements of the petroleum system
 
  | chapter = Sedimentary basin analysis
 
  | chapter = Sedimentary basin analysis
  | frompg  = 4-1
+
  | frompg  = 4-40
  | topg    = 4-123
+
  | topg    = 4-44
 
  | author  = John M. Armentrout
 
  | author  = John M. Armentrout
 
  | link    = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch04/ch04.htm
 
  | link    = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch04/ch04.htm
Line 22: Line 22:     
==Building regional log cross sections==
 
==Building regional log cross sections==
Regional stratigraphic well-log [[cross section]]s form the foundation for many basin studies. They give a regional view of basin stratigraphy and can be integrated with seismic and biostratigraphic data. The table below outlines the steps for building regional well-log cross sections.
+
Regional stratigraphic well-log [[cross section]]s form the foundation for many basin studies. They give a regional view of basin stratigraphy and can be integrated with seismic and biostratigraphic data. The list below outlines the steps for building regional well-log cross sections.
   −
{| class = "wikitable"
+
# Build a grid of well-log sections that crosses the entire basin, either along depositional [[dip]] or depositional strike. Use as many wells as practical. Where available, add measured sections and [[core description]]s to the grid.
|-
+
# Correlate cross sections. Look for [[Unconformity|unconformities]] and flooding surfaces.
! Step
+
# Tie the correlations from depositional-dip sections to depositional-strike sections.
! Action
+
# Confirm correlations on seismic reflection profiles.
|-
  −
| 1
  −
| Build a grid of well-log sections that crosses the entire basin, either along depositional dip or depositional strike. Use as many wells as practical. Where available, add measured sections and [[core description]]s to the grid.
  −
|-
  −
| 2
  −
| Correlate cross sections. Look for [[Unconformity|unconformities]] and flooding surfaces.
  −
|-
  −
| 3
  −
| Tie the correlations from depositional-dip sections to depositional-strike sections.
  −
|-
  −
| 4
  −
| Confirm correlations on seismic reflection profiles.
  −
|}
      
==Biostratigraphic patterns==
 
==Biostratigraphic patterns==
Using chronostratigraphically significant bioevents as defined by microfossil extinction events and abundance patterns, local cycles of transgression and [[Wikipedia:Marine_regression|regression]] can be correlated from well to well, providing a high-resolution calibration of depositional cyclicity. Patterns of relative dilution vs. concentration of fossils that correlate over a significant geographic area, such as a large portion of a basin margin, can be interpreted as reflecting cycles of regional transgression and regression rather than local lateral shifting of sediment input points.
+
Using chronostratigraphically significant bioevents as defined by microfossil extinction events and abundance patterns, local cycles of transgression and [[regression]] can be correlated from well to well, providing a high-resolution calibration of depositional cyclicity. Patterns of relative dilution vs. concentration of fossils that correlate over a significant geographic area, such as a large portion of a basin margin, can be interpreted as reflecting cycles of regional transgression and regression rather than local [[lateral]] shifting of sediment input points.
   −
Stratigraphic intervals rich in calcareous nannoplankton and foraminiferal fossils and having maximum gamma-ray values are interpreted to correlate with condensed depositional intervals deposited during relative sediment starvation related to transgression.<ref name=ch04r59>Loutit, T., S., Hardenbol, J., Vail, P., R., Baum, G., R., 1988, Condensed sections: the key to age determination and correlation of continental margin sequences: SEPM Special Publication 42, p. 183–213.</ref> Intervals devoid of fossils or having low abundance values, often associated with sandy lithofacies, can be interpreted as deposited during relative high rates of accumulation related to [[Depocenter#Sediment_supply_rate_and_facies_patterns|progradation]] of the sediment supply into the area of the well, marking a phase of regression. Biofacies are interpreted using benthic foraminiferal assemblages indicative of water mass conditions.<ref name=ch04r97>Tipsword, H., L., J., Setzer, F., M., Smith, F., L. Jr., 1966, Interpretation of depositional environment in Gulf Coast exploration from paleoecology and related stratigraphy: Gulf Coast Assoc. of Geological Societies Transactions, vol. 16, p. 119–130.</ref><ref name=ch04r28>Culver, S., J., 1988, New foraminiferal depth zonation of the northwestern Gulf of Mexico: Palaios, vol. 3, p. 69–85., 10., 2307/3514545</ref><ref name=ch04r7>Armentrout, J., M., 1991, Paleontological constraints on depositional [[modeling]]: examples of integration of biostratigraphy and seismic stratigraphy, Pliocene–Pleistocene, Gulf of Mexico, in Weimer, P., Link, M., H., eds., Seismic Facies and Sedimentary Processes of Submarine Fans and Turbidite Systems: New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 137–170.</ref>
+
Stratigraphic intervals rich in calcareous nannoplankton and foraminiferal fossils and having maximum gamma-ray values are interpreted to correlate with condensed depositional intervals deposited during relative sediment starvation related to transgression.<ref name=ch04r59>Loutit, T., S., Hardenbol, J., Vail, P., R., Baum, G., R., 1988, Condensed sections: the key to age determination and correlation of continental margin sequences: SEPM Special Publication 42, p. 183–213.</ref> Intervals devoid of fossils or having low abundance values, often associated with sandy [[lithofacies]], can be interpreted as deposited during relative high rates of accumulation related to [[Depocenter#Sediment_supply_rate_and_facies_patterns|progradation]] of the sediment supply into the area of the well, marking a phase of regression. Biofacies are interpreted using benthic foraminiferal assemblages indicative of water mass conditions.<ref name=ch04r97>Tipsword, H., L., J., Setzer, F., M., Smith, F., L. Jr., 1966, Interpretation of depositional environment in Gulf Coast exploration from paleoecology and related stratigraphy: Gulf Coast Assoc. of Geological Societies Transactions, vol. 16, p. 119–130.</ref><ref name=ch04r28>Culver, S., J., 1988, New foraminiferal depth zonation of the northwestern Gulf of Mexico: Palaios, vol. 3, p. 69–85., 10., 2307/3514545</ref><ref name=ch04r7>Armentrout, J., M., 1991, Paleontological constraints on depositional [[modeling]]: examples of integration of biostratigraphy and seismic stratigraphy, Pliocene–Pleistocene, Gulf of Mexico, in Weimer, P., Link, M., H., eds., Seismic Facies and Sedimentary Processes of Submarine Fans and Turbidite Systems: New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 137–170.</ref>
    
==GOM basin example==
 
==GOM basin example==
 
In the GOM basin, variations in well-log response and [[Fossil assemblage|biofacies]] distribution are analyzed for recognition of stacked depositional sequences. The [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma-ray]] log display provides a measure of sediment type, with curve deflections to the left suggesting increased sand content while high values to the right indicate increases in clay content. Use of multiple logs, especially [[Basic open hole tools#Spontaneous potential|spontaneous potential]], [[Basic open hole tools#Resistivity|resistivity]], density, and velocity logs calibrated by well-cutting descriptions and formation microscanner displays, provides a data set for reliable rock type identification. The figure below illustrates an interpretation template for log motif analysis.
 
In the GOM basin, variations in well-log response and [[Fossil assemblage|biofacies]] distribution are analyzed for recognition of stacked depositional sequences. The [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma-ray]] log display provides a measure of sediment type, with curve deflections to the left suggesting increased sand content while high values to the right indicate increases in clay content. Use of multiple logs, especially [[Basic open hole tools#Spontaneous potential|spontaneous potential]], [[Basic open hole tools#Resistivity|resistivity]], density, and velocity logs calibrated by well-cutting descriptions and formation microscanner displays, provides a data set for reliable rock type identification. The figure below illustrates an interpretation template for log motif analysis.
   −
Patterns of forestepping vs. backstepping log-motif funnels can define transgressive vs. regressive depositional trends and candidate systems tracts and sequences. Vail and Wornardt<ref name=ch04r101>Vail, P., R., Wornardt, W., W., 1990, Well log seismic stratigraphy: a new tool for exploration in the '90s: Proceedings, Gulf Coast Section SEPM 11th Annual Research conference, p. 379–388.</ref> and Armentrout et al.<ref name=ch04r8>Armentrout, J. M., S. J. Malacek, L. B. Fearn, C. E. Sheppard, P. H. Naylor, A. W. Miles, R. J. Desmarais, and R. E. Dunay, 1993, Log-motive analysis of Paleogene depositional systems tracts, central and northern North Sea: Defined by sequence stratigraphic analysis ''in'' J. R. Parker, ed., Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 4th Conference, The Geological Society of London, p. 45-57.</ref> detail the process.
+
Patterns of forestepping vs. backstepping log-motif funnels can define transgressive vs. [[Regression|regressive]] depositional trends and candidate systems tracts and sequences. Vail and Wornardt<ref name=ch04r101>Vail, P., R., Wornardt, W., W., 1990, Well log seismic stratigraphy: a new tool for exploration in the '90s: Proceedings, Gulf Coast Section SEPM 11th Annual Research conference, p. 379–388.</ref> and Armentrout et al.<ref name=ch04r8>Armentrout, J. M., S. J. Malacek, L. B. Fearn, C. E. Sheppard, P. H. Naylor, A. W. Miles, R. J. Desmarais, and R. E. Dunay, 1993, Log-motive analysis of Paleogene depositional systems tracts, central and northern North Sea: Defined by sequence stratigraphic analysis ''in'' J. R. Parker, ed., Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 4th Conference, The Geological Society of London, p. 45-57.</ref> detail the process.
    
==GOM basin example chart==
 
==GOM basin example chart==
Line 60: Line 47:  
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
   −
The histogram patterns of foraminiferal and calcareous nannoplankton abundance for the South Galveston Mobil A-158 #3 well are shown in [[:file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-23.png|Figure 3]]. The histogram is based on a detailed checklist of the relative abundance of each species of fossil in each well-cutting sample.<ref name=ch04r10>Armentrout, J., M., Clement, J., F., 1990, Biostratigraphic calibration of depositional cycles: a case study in High Island–Galveston–East Breaks areas, offshore Texas: Proceedings, Gulf Coast Section SEPM 11th Annual Research Conference, p. 21–51.</ref> Display of this data in two-way time facilitates integration with seismic reflection profiles using the [[synthetic seismogram]] to match the well data with the seismic reflection profile at the well site. Patterns of shallow vs. deep [[Fossil assemblage|biofacies]] and fossil abundance (i.e., concentration vs. dilution) can be correlated with [[Depocenter#Sediment_supply_rate_and_facies_patterns|progradation]] of sandstone vs. mudstone interpreted from wireline log patterns. Bioevents (abbreviated acronyms such as 2B and SG) and faunal discontinuity events (abbreviated FDA-3 and FDA-4) provide correlation horizons between which the abundance patterns provide additional events for correlation.<ref name=ch04r7 />
+
The histogram patterns of foraminiferal and calcareous nannoplankton abundance for the South Galveston Mobil A-158 #3 well are shown in [[:file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-23.png|Figure 3]]. The histogram is based on a detailed checklist of the relative abundance of each species of fossil in each well-cutting sample.<ref name=ch04r10>Armentrout, J., M., Clement, J., F., 1990, Biostratigraphic calibration of depositional cycles: a case study in High Island–Galveston–East Breaks areas, offshore Texas: Proceedings, Gulf Coast Section SEPM 11th Annual Research Conference, p. 21–51.</ref> Display of this data in two-way time facilitates integration with seismic reflection profiles using the [[synthetic seismogram]] to match the well data with the seismic reflection profile at the well site. Patterns of shallow vs. deep [[Fossil assemblage|biofacies]] and fossil abundance (i.e., concentration vs. dilution) can be correlated with [[Depocenter#Sediment_supply_rate_and_facies_patterns|progradation]] of sandstone vs. [[mudstone]] interpreted from wireline log patterns. Bioevents (abbreviated acronyms such as 2B and SG) and faunal discontinuity events (abbreviated FDA-3 and FDA-4) provide correlation horizons between which the abundance patterns provide additional events for correlation.<ref name=ch04r7 />
    
In the histogram in [[:file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-23.png|Figure 3]] (see [[:file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-17.png|Figure 1]] for well location), the foraminiferal abundance scale is 0-1000 specimens and the nannoplankton abundance scale is 0-800 specimens. Biofacies include inner neritic (IN, 0-50 m), middle neritic (MN, 50-100 m), outer neritic (ON, 100-200 m), upper bathyal (UPPB, 200-500 m), middle bathyal (MDLB, 500-1000 m), and lower bathyal (LOWB, 1000–2000 m). This figure is the leftmost (southern) well panel in [[:file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-24.png|Figure 4]]. The wireline log (gamma ray) motif patterns ([[:file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-22.png|Figure 2]]), biostratigraphic abundance events, and extinction datums provide correlation events.
 
In the histogram in [[:file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-23.png|Figure 3]] (see [[:file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-17.png|Figure 1]] for well location), the foraminiferal abundance scale is 0-1000 specimens and the nannoplankton abundance scale is 0-800 specimens. Biofacies include inner neritic (IN, 0-50 m), middle neritic (MN, 50-100 m), outer neritic (ON, 100-200 m), upper bathyal (UPPB, 200-500 m), middle bathyal (MDLB, 500-1000 m), and lower bathyal (LOWB, 1000–2000 m). This figure is the leftmost (southern) well panel in [[:file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-24.png|Figure 4]]. The wireline log (gamma ray) motif patterns ([[:file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-22.png|Figure 2]]), biostratigraphic abundance events, and extinction datums provide correlation events.
Line 75: Line 62:     
==See also==
 
==See also==
* [[Depositional sequence]]
+
* [[East Breaks depositional sequence]]
 
* [[Definitions of depositional system elements]]
 
* [[Definitions of depositional system elements]]
 
* [[Identifying depositional sequences]]
 
* [[Identifying depositional sequences]]
Line 92: Line 79:  
[[Category:Critical elements of the petroleum system]]  
 
[[Category:Critical elements of the petroleum system]]  
 
[[Category:Sedimentary basin analysis]]
 
[[Category:Sedimentary basin analysis]]
 +
[[Category:Treatise Handbook 3]]

Navigation menu