Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...kerlec, G., M., 1990, SEALS: A short course for risking top seal and fault seal: Franklin, Pennsylvania, SEALS International, 600 p.</ref> Koch et al., 1995 KB (757 words) - 15:43, 30 March 2022
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...placement pressure of a seal depends on both the physical character of the seal (pore throat radius and pore throat size distribution) and the physical cha4 KB (530 words) - 15:56, 31 March 2022
- #REDIRECT [[Intact top seal]]29 bytes (4 words) - 20:33, 19 December 2014
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...2, p. 363–374.</ref><ref name=ch10r10>Buck, S., Robertson, G., 1996, Fault seal behavior at Beryl field, UK North Sea: observations from 20 years of produc4 KB (530 words) - 15:21, 30 March 2022
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...field in the Gulf Coast and demonstrates the application of routine fault seal analysis.5 KB (769 words) - 18:12, 29 March 2022
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...re and composition of fault zones and the many factors that could affect a seal, it has been surprising to find such a simple relationship, basin after bas4 KB (509 words) - 16:52, 29 March 2022
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...commonly risked in an intuitive, qualitative manner. However, quantitative seal analysis, using those few techniques available, improves success ratios and4 KB (528 words) - 17:48, 24 March 2022
- #REDIRECT [[Midale seal capacity and trap type]]48 bytes (7 words) - 21:28, 22 July 2014
- {{merge|Seal capacity}} | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal5 KB (760 words) - 20:55, 31 March 2022
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...o a [[Trap systems: structural, stratigraphic, and fluidic|trap]]. [[Fault seal behavior|Fault seals]] control not only whether a trap retains hydrocarbons2 KB (261 words) - 18:12, 29 March 2022
- Articles on fault seal.51 members (0 subcategories, 3 files) - 13:59, 31 January 2014
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...sure of the seal, the seal leaks. For example, a shale top seal that could seal a 100-m column of oil might leak if the column increased to [[length::101 m2 KB (266 words) - 15:45, 31 March 2022
- #REDIRECT [[Top and fault seal evaluation]]43 bytes (6 words) - 19:53, 30 September 2014
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal * [[Fault seal and migration pathways]]2 KB (316 words) - 18:20, 29 March 2022
File:Seal capacity trap type fig1.png (2,000 × 1,329 (731 KB)) - 17:49, 6 February 2014- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...-seal_fig10-39.png|Figure 1]] is an example of evaluating, or risking, top seal integrity using two traps in the Central Graben, North Sea. One trap was [[6 KB (910 words) - 15:44, 30 March 2022
File:Seal capacity trap type fig2.png (2,000 × 1,327 (803 KB)) - 17:50, 6 February 2014- .../ref><ref name=Knipe_1992>Knipe, R. J., 1992, Faulting processes and fault seal, ''in'' R. M. Larsen, H. Brekke, B. T. Larsen, and E. Talleraas, eds., Stru ...es.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1997/06jun/0897/0897.htm Quantitative fault seal prediction]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 81, no. 6, p. 897-917.</ref>. One method of14 KB (2,146 words) - 19:35, 13 September 2022
- ==Significance of r<sub>bt</sub> for seal capacity== ...he same facies as the Midale vuggy beds, analyzed here as a possible updip seal. This study shows the updip change in pore throat sizes could account for 25 KB (723 words) - 17:02, 12 April 2022
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal Quantitative fault seal analysis is a proven tool in numerous basins. There are, however, limitatio3 KB (398 words) - 17:35, 29 March 2022
Page text matches
- #REDIRECT [[Top seal integrity: Central Graben example]]56 bytes (7 words) - 20:50, 19 December 2014
File:Evaluating-top-and-fault-seal fig10-28.jpg [[Category:Evaluating top and fault seal]](1,682 × 2,134 (1.01 MB)) - 16:17, 31 January 2014File:Evaluating-top-and-fault-seal fig10-20.jpg [[Category:Evaluating top and fault seal]](1,577 × 2,012 (1.54 MB)) - 16:21, 31 January 2014File:Evaluating-top-and-fault-seal fig10-24.jpg [[Category:Evaluating top and fault seal]](1,124 × 2,169 (602 KB)) - 16:23, 31 January 2014- #REDIRECT [[Fault seal analysis example: Gulf Coast]]53 bytes (7 words) - 20:37, 22 August 2014
- #REDIRECT [[Midale seal capacity and trap type]]48 bytes (7 words) - 21:28, 22 July 2014
- #REDIRECT [[Seal capacity variation with depth and hydrocarbon phase]]70 bytes (9 words) - 15:15, 21 July 2014
- #REDIRECT [[Seal capacity: pitfalls and limitations of estimation]]67 bytes (8 words) - 21:45, 21 May 2014
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...ntrolled by [[fault]]-related [[spill point]]s that are independent of top seal thickness.3 KB (464 words) - 20:56, 31 March 2022
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...commonly risked in an intuitive, qualitative manner. However, quantitative seal analysis, using those few techniques available, improves success ratios and4 KB (528 words) - 17:48, 24 March 2022
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal Quantitative fault seal analysis is a proven tool in numerous basins. There are, however, limitatio3 KB (398 words) - 17:35, 29 March 2022
File:M106Ch12Table4.jpg ...at have not been produced. Reservoir strata type: carbonate and sandstone. Seal strata type: evaporite, argillaceous limestone (arg limestone), shale, marl(700 × 438 (80 KB)) - 15:41, 12 May 2016File:M106Ch12Table4a.jpg ...at have not been produced. Reservoir strata type: carbonate and sandstone. Seal strata type: evaporite, argillaceous limestone (arg limestone), shale, marl(700 × 891 (157 KB)) - 15:41, 12 May 2016File:M106Ch12Table4c.jpg ...at have not been produced. Reservoir strata type: carbonate and sandstone. Seal strata type: evaporite, argillaceous limestone (arg limestone), shale, marl(700 × 906 (160 KB)) - 15:42, 12 May 2016File:M106Ch12Table4d.jpg ...at have not been produced. Reservoir strata type: carbonate and sandstone. Seal strata type: evaporite, argillaceous limestone (arg limestone), shale, marl(700 × 423 (78 KB)) - 15:42, 12 May 2016File:M106Ch12Table4b.jpg ...at have not been produced. Reservoir strata type: carbonate and sandstone. Seal strata type: evaporite, argillaceous limestone (arg limestone), shale, marl(700 × 888 (149 KB)) - 15:41, 12 May 2016- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...s, interconnected pathway of hydrocarbon-filled pore space. Flow through a seal occurs with saturations of 4.5–17% of the rock pore volume, averaging 10%2 KB (313 words) - 13:57, 1 April 2022
- ...column) exceeds the seal capillary [[displacement pressure]]. This type of seal does not [[fracture]] during [[deformation]]. ...of the seal. Under these conditions, the relative [[permeability]] of the seal to petroleum is zero. The [[accumulation]] remains preserved until one of t3 KB (475 words) - 17:08, 1 February 2022
- | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal ...l analysis]] are required for realistic reservoir simulations. Neither the seal behavior, [[transmissibility]], [[permeability]], nor areas of sand/sand ju3 KB (479 words) - 15:21, 30 March 2022
- ...[Diffusive seal leakage]]). The most likely mechanism is controlled by the seal lithology and the geological history. ==Seal failure timing==4 KB (571 words) - 18:06, 1 February 2022