Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
File:Shale-Gas-Discussion-Group-hero.jpg (640 × 268 (31 KB)) - 23:53, 19 January 2021
Page text matches
- ...ategories please use the templates available at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion]].</span> ...templates please use the templates available at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion]].</span>[[Category:Pages with misplaced templates]]</includeonly>1 KB (149 words) - 18:38, 17 January 2014
- More figures and discussion of different grain size scales are needed.[[User:FWhitehurst|FWhitehurst]]144 bytes (19 words) - 18:07, 18 March 2014
- ...hen you may [[WP:BOLD|boldly]] merge the pages without tagging and without discussion. Some editors also use these tags to mark pages that obviously require mer ...should consider boldly merging the pages yourself rather than setting up a discussion.3 KB (484 words) - 19:35, 17 January 2014
- ...ience.com/journal/2013/12/3/which-brittleness-index.html Easily understood discussion of the term, both mathematically and in words]578 bytes (63 words) - 13:15, 24 September 2014
- * [http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=2848 Discussion of thrust belts, orogenies, and thin-skinned deformation]548 bytes (67 words) - 15:35, 6 January 2015
- * [http://www.cas.umt.edu/geosciences/faculty/hendrix/g432/g432_L10.htm Discussion of all sediment gravity flows]675 bytes (81 words) - 19:04, 11 March 2015
File:M114CH03FG02.jpg ...the regional distribution of oil shows encountered in wells. See text for discussion of oil show classification and terminology (modified from Dolson et al., 20(700 × 930 (155 KB)) - 17:48, 4 January 2019- ==Discussion==3 KB (370 words) - 17:53, 18 February 2022
- ==Discussion==3 KB (405 words) - 17:44, 12 April 2022
- ==Discussion==4 KB (596 words) - 18:37, 17 February 2022
- ==Discussion of diagenetic trap families==5 KB (645 words) - 16:14, 13 April 2022
- ==Discussion==5 KB (633 words) - 20:02, 18 February 2022
- ...ne a drill location, moving from the regional scale to the drill site. The discussion is from the perspective of a full-cycle exploration play, where we have a p ...t belt]] play of the U.S. [[Rocky Mountains]] area. The following workflow discussion tracks this play concept from inception to drill location through a “norm4 KB (480 words) - 16:22, 3 February 2022
- ===Discussion=== ...of the page. See if others have already discussed your concern, or start a discussion yourself. This will help prevent "edit wars," where editors continually ma8 KB (1,305 words) - 16:59, 27 May 2015
- ==Discussion==5 KB (753 words) - 19:58, 18 February 2022
- ...e-grained, deep-water deposits, a review of fine-grained turbidites, and a discussion of conglomeratic megabeds are provided prior to detailed discussions of the3 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 14:53, 18 January 2022
- ==Discussion of GOM basin==7 KB (970 words) - 20:33, 18 February 2022
- Often used for discussion on [[talk pages]]. Often used for discussion on talk pages.6 KB (906 words) - 15:09, 9 October 2013
- ...than [[distance::14 km]] (>45,000 ft) of sedimentary rock. (For additional discussion of the structural framework, see Jones and Freed.<ref name=ch04r50>Jones, J .... of Geological Societies Special Publication, p. 93–94. ''Presents a good discussion of salt distribution and tectonics.''</ref>8 KB (1,069 words) - 20:03, 18 February 2022
- ...(one indent being 1.6em), particularly handy for inclusion in an indented discussion thread.3 KB (391 words) - 14:45, 5 November 2013
