Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • File:Borehole-gravity fig1.png
    ...y between 6330 and 6370 ft is caused by porosity not detected by the gamma-gamma density log. The broader difference anomaly observed over the length of the
    (933 × 1,451 (17 KB)) - 15:41, 14 January 2014
  • File:Rate-of-penetration fig2.png
    Example of correlating ROP with gamma ray curves.
    (954 × 1,212 (89 KB)) - 17:58, 14 January 2014
  • File:M106Ch07Fig04.jpg
    ...alues of greater than 1–2%, depending on the degree of thermal maturation. Gamma-ray values in some wells have been adjusted according to offset shale basel
    (564 × 855 (75 KB)) - 20:49, 18 April 2016
  • File:Basic-open-hole-tools fig1.png
    A typical log showing SP, gamma ray, dual Induction, and sonic measurements. Copyright: Schlumberger, 1983.
    (948 × 2,429 (78 KB)) - 18:21, 13 January 2014
  • File:Basic-open-hole-tools fig2.png
    A typical log showing density, compensated neutron, Pe, gamma ray, and caliper measurements. Copyright: Schlumberger, 1983.
    (944 × 2,424 (71 KB)) - 18:21, 13 January 2014
  • File:Lithofacies-and-environmental-analysis-of-clastic-depositional-systems fig2.png
    Gamma ray correlation (dip section) of a series of prograding shoreface sandstone
    (943 × 448 (16 KB)) - 21:36, 13 January 2014
  • File:M91FG195.JPG
    ...hile (from Beaubouef, 2004). The lower section shows a series of idealized gamma ray logs. Reprinted with permission from the AAPG.
    (800 × 669 (93 KB)) - 15:36, 17 August 2015
  • File:M91FG188.JPG
    ...ska (from Tye et al., 1999). Reprinted with permission from the AAPG. GR = gamma ray. From Shepherd, M., 2009, Deltaic reservoirs, in M. Shepherd, Oil field
    (800 × 385 (54 KB)) - 16:21, 20 August 2015
  • File:M91FG112.JPG
    ...et al., 1999). Reprinted with permission from the Geological Society. GR = Gamma Ray; RFTtrade = Repeat Formation Tester; UKCF = Upper Kimmeridge Clay Forma
    (800 × 856 (118 KB)) - 19:29, 18 August 2015
  • File:M91Ch6FG43.JPG
    Gamma-ray, density, neutron, and sonic log response of a sandstone and shale sequ
    (800 × 827 (107 KB)) - 17:07, 3 June 2015
  • File:Geological-cross-sections fig2.png
    ...ake the cross section more compact. The left track of each log is an SP or gamma ray trace and the right track is a resistivity trace. (From Slatt et al., 1
    (1,921 × 1,041 (171 KB)) - 15:32, 14 January 2014
  • File:M91Ch11FG72.JPG
    ...rinted with permission from the AAPG. SP = spontaneous potential log; GR = gamma-ray log. Shepherd, M., 2009, Lithofacies maps, in M. Shepherd, Oil field pr
    (800 × 658 (69 KB)) - 15:51, 27 April 2015
  • File:Lithofacies-and-environmental-analysis-of-clastic-depositional-systems fig3.png
    ...of major depositional environments. The curve on the left shows the SP or gamma ray response and the curve on the right shows the relative grain size profi
    (1,950 × 1,563 (201 KB)) - 21:37, 13 January 2014