Magnetotelluric survey case history: volcanic terrain (Columbia River Plateau)

From AAPG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps
Series Treatise in Petroleum Geology
Part Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
Chapter Applying magnetotellurics
Author Arnie Ostrander
Link Web page
Store AAPG Store

Seismic methods do not work well in areas covered by volcanics because of the dispersive nature of the volcanics and because of the decrease in acoustic velocity at the base of the volcanics.

Volcanic terrain, however, is an ideal environment for magnetotelluric (MT) surveys because it is a simple, three-layer stratigraphic package: resistive basalts over conductive sediments, which in turn overlie resistive metamorphic or granitic basement rocks.

Survey results[edit]

Figure 1 13-station MT natural source survey profile. Drafted from data from Mills.[1]

Figure 1 is a 13-station MT natural source survey profile. This east-west section begins near the Idaho-Washington border and extends approximately length::75 mi (120 km) to the west (Mills, personal communication, 1994).

Structural details[edit]

These data provided the following structural details:

  • Considerable variation in the thickness of the volcanics
  • Considerable variation in the depth to top of basement
  • Basalts thin to the east
  • Sediments thin to east and eventually disappear
  • Basement resistivities are an order-of-magnitude higher on the east end of the profile

Controlled-source MT data could provide 3-D imaging of individual prospects.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Mills, A., 1994, Zephyr Geophysical Services, personal communication.

External links[edit]

find literature about
Magnetotelluric survey case history: volcanic terrain (Columbia River Plateau)
Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Google button.png