Central Feedback Page

1,212 posts

Sort by:

172.69.170.93 posted feedback to LECO method in estimating richness

21:41, 23 September 2020 | Details

It is not true to say that LECO has been replaced by pyrolysis for TOC. Nor is the pyrolysis method superior. LECO actually measures total carbon, pyrolysis fudges it.

Is this feedback helpful?Yes No

Flag as abuse

162.158.191.133 posted feedback to Geologic mapping (UB)

14:08, 20 September 2020 | Details

i havent found the uses of geological maps

Is this feedback helpful?Yes No

Flag as abuse

185.154.244.14 posted feedback to Amplitude (seismic)

12:40, 28 November 2019 | Details

YOU HAVE DONE NOBLE BUT YOU NEEDTO WORK ON THE ENGLISH FOR A CLEARER UNDERSTANDING

Is this feedback helpful?Yes No

Flag as abuse

192.225.222.128 posted feedback to Pinedale field

14:18, 14 September 2018 | Details

The article is really well-written. It would be good to see a stratigraphic column indicating the producing intervals in the field, and geological cross-sections to get a sense for the structural setting and stratigraphic complexity.

Is this feedback helpful?Yes No

Flag as abuse

103.226.70.131 posted feedback to Permeability

03:05, 20 November 2017 | Details

this page needs some pictures on the apparatus and some recommendations

Is this feedback helpful?Yes No

Flag as abuse

185.154.246.12 posted feedback to Core-to-log transformations and porosity-permeability relationships

10:21, 25 October 2017 | Details

not clear

Is this feedback helpful?Yes No

Flag as abuse

152.179.158.50 posted feedback to Rock-Eval pyrolysis

22:11, 19 May 2017 | Details

TOC estimate equation is incorrect: TOC (unit as in %) =[0.83*(S1+S2)+S4]/10; this makes the units consistent.

Is this feedback helpful?Yes No

Flag as abuse

123.211.149.8 posted feedback to Amplitude (seismic)

05:30, 7 November 2015 | Details

the website is hard to understand as some information is not in english

Is this feedback helpful?Yes No

Flag as abuse

96.53.15.226 posted feedback to Normal hydrostatic pressure gradients

21:20, 15 October 2015 | Details

In the table Fluid Gas(gaseous) with Normal density range 0.007-0.30 Should have a Gradient range (psi/ft) of 0.003-0.113 ??? not 0.003-1.130 - obviously it should be less than the Gas(liquid range)

Is this feedback helpful?Yes No

Flag as abuse