Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Borehole-gravity fig1.png ...y between 6330 and 6370 ft is caused by porosity not detected by the gamma-gamma density log. The broader difference anomaly observed over the length of the(933 × 1,451 (17 KB)) - 15:41, 14 January 2014File:Rate-of-penetration fig2.png Example of correlating ROP with gamma ray curves.(954 × 1,212 (89 KB)) - 17:58, 14 January 2014File:M106Ch07Fig04.jpg ...alues of greater than 1–2%, depending on the degree of thermal maturation. Gamma-ray values in some wells have been adjusted according to offset shale basel(564 × 855 (75 KB)) - 20:49, 18 April 2016- * [http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/nanz/images/23.htm Gamma-ray and resistivity response]419 bytes (57 words) - 15:36, 6 January 2015
File:Basic-open-hole-tools fig1.png A typical log showing SP, gamma ray, dual Induction, and sonic measurements. Copyright: Schlumberger, 1983.(948 × 2,429 (78 KB)) - 18:21, 13 January 2014File:Basic-open-hole-tools fig2.png A typical log showing density, compensated neutron, Pe, gamma ray, and caliper measurements. Copyright: Schlumberger, 1983.(944 × 2,424 (71 KB)) - 18:21, 13 January 2014- ==Outcrop gamma-ray logging==3 KB (412 words) - 22:40, 1 February 2022
File:Lithofacies-and-environmental-analysis-of-clastic-depositional-systems fig2.png Gamma ray correlation (dip section) of a series of prograding shoreface sandstone(943 × 448 (16 KB)) - 21:36, 13 January 2014File:M91FG195.JPG ...hile (from Beaubouef, 2004). The lower section shows a series of idealized gamma ray logs. Reprinted with permission from the AAPG.(800 × 669 (93 KB)) - 15:36, 17 August 2015File:M91FG188.JPG ...ska (from Tye et al., 1999). Reprinted with permission from the AAPG. GR = gamma ray. From Shepherd, M., 2009, Deltaic reservoirs, in M. Shepherd, Oil field(800 × 385 (54 KB)) - 16:21, 20 August 2015File:M91FG112.JPG ...et al., 1999). Reprinted with permission from the Geological Society. GR = Gamma Ray; RFTtrade = Repeat Formation Tester; UKCF = Upper Kimmeridge Clay Forma(800 × 856 (118 KB)) - 19:29, 18 August 2015File:M91Ch6FG43.JPG Gamma-ray, density, neutron, and sonic log response of a sandstone and shale sequ(800 × 827 (107 KB)) - 17:07, 3 June 2015File:Geological-cross-sections fig2.png ...ake the cross section more compact. The left track of each log is an SP or gamma ray trace and the right track is a resistivity trace. (From Slatt et al., 1(1,921 × 1,041 (171 KB)) - 15:32, 14 January 2014- ...P_{\text{c system2}} \left ( \frac{\gamma \cos \Theta \text{ of system1}}{\gamma \cos \Theta \text{ of system2}} \right )</math> ...c res}} = P_{\text{c lab}} \left ( \frac{\gamma \cos \Theta_{\text{res}}}{\gamma \cos \Theta_{\text{lab}}} \right )</math>6 KB (850 words) - 17:22, 4 April 2022
File:M91Ch11FG72.JPG ...rinted with permission from the AAPG. SP = spontaneous potential log; GR = gamma-ray log. Shepherd, M., 2009, Lithofacies maps, in M. Shepherd, Oil field pr(800 × 658 (69 KB)) - 15:51, 27 April 2015File:Lithofacies-and-environmental-analysis-of-clastic-depositional-systems fig3.png ...of major depositional environments. The curve on the left shows the SP or gamma ray response and the curve on the right shows the relative grain size profi(1,950 × 1,563 (201 KB)) - 21:37, 13 January 2014- | rowspan = 2 | Correlation || [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|Gamma ray]] | Spectral gamma ray10 KB (1,427 words) - 16:26, 18 January 2022
- ...open hole tools#Resistivity|electric]], [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]], etc.). It is important to realize that a sonic log never goes to the2 KB (348 words) - 19:10, 27 January 2022
- ...e measured using density sonic, neutron, [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]], and [[Basic open hole tools#Resistivity|resistivity logs]]. The tabl | Gamma ray (GR) or uranium (U) || High || High GR caused by U; can be linear with5 KB (768 words) - 15:48, 9 February 2022
- ...nts. (right) Density values measured by the BHGM (left line) and the gamma-gamma tools (right line). Copyright: Rasmussen;<ref name=Rasmussen>Rasmussen, N. ...w is caused by a remote higher [[porosity]] zone not detected by the gamma-gamma density log. The broader difference anomaly observed over the length of the11 KB (1,596 words) - 18:08, 24 January 2022