Changes

==Which method is better?==

==Which method is better?==

The choice of MT method depends on the survey objectives. Natural-source data are best suited for regional surveys where the stations are widely spaced (e.g., frontier basin analysis). Controlled-source data are best suited for mapping structural detail where the stations lie along a continuous profile at 100–200-m (300–600-ft) spacings. The maximum depth of exploration for the controlled-source method is 3,000–4,500 m (10,000–15,000 ft) in a typical [[Wikipedia:Volcanic_rock|volcanic]], [[carbonate]], or [http://geology.about.com/od/more_igrocks/a/granite.htm granite] [[Thrust belt|overthrust]] terrain. Natural-source data have considerably deeper penetration but poorer resolution at shallower depths.

The choice of MT method depends on the survey objectives. Natural-source data are best suited for regional surveys where the stations are widely spaced (e.g., frontier basin analysis; see [[Magnetotellurics case history: frontier basin analysis (Amazon Basin, Colombia)]]). Controlled-source data are best suited for mapping structural detail where the stations lie along a continuous profile at 100–200-m (300–600-ft) spacings. The maximum depth of exploration for the controlled-source method is 3,000–4,500 m (10,000–15,000 ft) in a typical [[Wikipedia:Volcanic_rock|volcanic]], [[carbonate]], or [http://geology.about.com/od/more_igrocks/a/granite.htm granite] [[Thrust belt|overthrust]] terrain. Natural-source data have considerably deeper penetration but poorer resolution at shallower depths.

==Where to use MT==

==Where to use MT==