Difference between revisions of "Yowlumne field"

From AAPG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:
 
file:Mth14ch02f01.jpg|{{figure number|1}}Structure map of Yowlumne field drawn on the N-point marker, a regional correlation horizon that marks the approximate top of the Stevens Sandstone. Note the fanlike shape of the Yowlumne Sandstone and the relationship of Yowlumne Units A and B to the anticlinal closure.
 
file:Mth14ch02f01.jpg|{{figure number|1}}Structure map of Yowlumne field drawn on the N-point marker, a regional correlation horizon that marks the approximate top of the Stevens Sandstone. Note the fanlike shape of the Yowlumne Sandstone and the relationship of Yowlumne Units A and B to the anticlinal closure.
 
file:Mthch02f02.jpg|{{figure number|2}}Stratigraphic section showing nomenclature for the Yowlumne field area. The Stevens is an informal unit that represents a deep-marine, clastic facies of the Monterey Formation, an organic-rich shale that is considered to be the main source rock for most of the oil produced from the basin.
 
file:Mthch02f02.jpg|{{figure number|2}}Stratigraphic section showing nomenclature for the Yowlumne field area. The Stevens is an informal unit that represents a deep-marine, clastic facies of the Monterey Formation, an organic-rich shale that is considered to be the main source rock for most of the oil produced from the basin.
 +
file:mth14ch02f03.jpg|{{figure number|3}}Type log for Yowlumne field with reservoir statistics and rock properties of the Yowlumne Sandstone. Reservoir quality decreases from the axis of the fan eastward toward the fan margin.
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  
Line 33: Line 34:
  
 
<gallery mode=packed heights=300px widths=300px>
 
<gallery mode=packed heights=300px widths=300px>
file:mth14ch02f03.jpg|{{figure number|3}}Type log for Yowlumne field with reservoir statistics and rock properties of the Yowlumne Sandstone. Reservoir quality decreases from the axis of the fan eastward toward the fan margin.
 
 
file:Mth14ch02f04.jpg|{{figure number|4}}Seismic line and cross section A-A' showing left-stepping geometries and cross-sectional lens shape of the Yowlumne fan. The line and section transect the fan from west to east, perpendicular to the direction of sediment transport.
 
file:Mth14ch02f04.jpg|{{figure number|4}}Seismic line and cross section A-A' showing left-stepping geometries and cross-sectional lens shape of the Yowlumne fan. The line and section transect the fan from west to east, perpendicular to the direction of sediment transport.
 
file:Mth14ch02f05.jpg|{{figure number|5}} Map with cross sections X-Z and Y-Z showing basinward-stepping geometries exhibited by lobe-shaped sand bodies that make up the Yowlumne Sandstone. Note 660 m (2100 ft) of structural relief between oil-water contacts in the lobes of Units A and B.
 
file:Mth14ch02f05.jpg|{{figure number|5}} Map with cross sections X-Z and Y-Z showing basinward-stepping geometries exhibited by lobe-shaped sand bodies that make up the Yowlumne Sandstone. Note 660 m (2100 ft) of structural relief between oil-water contacts in the lobes of Units A and B.
Line 40: Line 40:
 
Thin shales divide the fan into lobe-shaped reservoir layers ([[:file:Mth14ch02f04.jpg|Figure 4]]). Five of these&mdash;the A, B, C, D, and E sands&mdash;produce oil from Unit B. The W sand is a basal sixth layer that is wet and isolated by pressure from over-lying sandstones. Layers A through E merge into homogenous, clean sandstone on the west margin of the fan, yet contain interbedded shale on the east. For example, the 16x-4 [[horizontal well]] on the west side ([[:file:Mth14ch02f01.jpg|Figure 1]]) penetrates a thick interval of clean sandstone (Marino and Schultz<ref name=Marinoandschultz_1992>Marino, A. W., and S. M. Schultz, 1992, Case study of Stevens sand horizontal well: Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 24910, p. 549-563.</ref>). By contrast, the 73x-3 well on the east side ([[:file:Mth14ch02f01.jpg|Figure 1]]) penetrates shale layers, some of which are two or more meters thick, interbedded with the reservoir sandstones.
 
Thin shales divide the fan into lobe-shaped reservoir layers ([[:file:Mth14ch02f04.jpg|Figure 4]]). Five of these&mdash;the A, B, C, D, and E sands&mdash;produce oil from Unit B. The W sand is a basal sixth layer that is wet and isolated by pressure from over-lying sandstones. Layers A through E merge into homogenous, clean sandstone on the west margin of the fan, yet contain interbedded shale on the east. For example, the 16x-4 [[horizontal well]] on the west side ([[:file:Mth14ch02f01.jpg|Figure 1]]) penetrates a thick interval of clean sandstone (Marino and Schultz<ref name=Marinoandschultz_1992>Marino, A. W., and S. M. Schultz, 1992, Case study of Stevens sand horizontal well: Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 24910, p. 549-563.</ref>). By contrast, the 73x-3 well on the east side ([[:file:Mth14ch02f01.jpg|Figure 1]]) penetrates shale layers, some of which are two or more meters thick, interbedded with the reservoir sandstones.
  
Well-log correlations and 3-D seismic data indicate downlap within the fan, with basinward progradation to the north and lateral progradation to the west ([[:file:M14ch02f04.jpg|Figure 4]], [[:file:M14ch02f05.jpg|Figure 5]]). In other words, lobe-shaped, shale-bounded reservoir layers in Unit B step to the left when facing basinward, in the direction of sediment transport (Jessup and Kamerling<ref name=Jessupandkamerling_1991>Jessup,</ref>
+
Well-log correlations and 3-D seismic data indicate downlap within the fan, with basinward progradation to the north and lateral progradation to the west ([[:file:Mth14ch02f04.jpg|Figure 4]], [[:file:Mth14ch02f05.jpg|Figure 5]]). In other words, lobe-shaped, shale-bounded reservoir layers in Unit B step to the left when facing basinward, in the direction of sediment transport (Jessup and Kamerling;<ref name=Jessupandkamerling_1991>Jessup, D. D., and M. Kamerling, 1991, [http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/abstracts/html/1991/pacific/abstracts/0368b.htm Depositional style of the Yowlumne sands, Yowlumne oil field, southern San Joaquin Basin, California] (abs.): AAPG Bulletin, v. 75, p. 368.</ref> Clark et al.<ref name=Clarketal_1996b>Clark, M. S., J. Melvin, and M. Kamerling, 1996, [http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/abstracts/html/1996/annual/abstracts/0027.htm Growth patterns of a Miocene turbidite complex in an active-margin basin, Yowlumne field, San Joaquin Basin, California] (abs.): AAPG Annual Convention Official Program, San Diego, 1996, v. 5, p. A27.</ref>). Thus, the basal productive layer (sand E) is thickest on the right (east) side of the fan, whereas the top layer (sand A) is thickest on the left (west).
 +
 
 +
Variations in reservoir pressures and injection of radioactive tracers indicate weak compartmentalization of the reservoir, which results in separate permeability pathways along which fluids flow at different rates (Metz and Whitworth, their figure 9;<ref name=Metzandwhitworth_1984>Metz,</ref> Berg and Royo<ref name=Bergandroyo_1990>Berg,</ref>). Most likely, these pathways represent different flow units that, for the most part, are in pressure communication over geologic time. Consequently, these compartments, which correlate to the shale-bounded, lobe-shaped reservoir layers already discussed, develop the same [[oil-water contact]] over thousands of years yet acquire slightly different pressures as the field is rapidly produced over tens of years.
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 17:41, 4 December 2015

Horizontal Wells: Focus on the Reservoir
Series Methods in Exploration No. 14
Chapter Characterization and exploitation of the distal margin of a fan-shaped turbidite reservoir: The ARCO-DOE 91X-3 horizontal well project, Yowlumne field, San Juaquin Basin, California
Author Michael S. Clark, Rick K. Prather, John D. Melvin
Link Web page
Store AAPG Store

Yowlumne is a giant oil field in the San Joaquin Basin, California (Figure 1), that has produced, through December 2000, more than 17.2 million m3 (108 million bbl) of oil and 2.7 billion m3 (94 billion ft3) of gas from upper Miocene, deep-water sandstones known as the Stevens (Figure 1).

These sandstones, which represent classic facies of organic-rich shales in the Monterey Formation (Figure 2), are some of the most prolific reservoirs in the basin and have contributed about 15% of more than 1.9 billion m3 (12.3 billion bbl) of oil produced in the area since 1864. Because Stevens oils derive from Monterey Shale source rocks, Yowlumne is part of a Monterey-Stevens petroleum system (Graham and Williams).[1]

Most production at Yowlumne is from the Yowlumne Sandstone, one of several discontinuous sandstone bodies collectively referred to as the Stevens (Figure 3).

Structure[edit]

The oil accumulation at Yowlumne is controlled in part by an anticlinal closure formed during Miocene-Pliocene deformation of the south basin margin. Yowlumne Unit A was created to waterflood the area of structural closure, but subsequent drilling established production in a stratigraphic accumulation on the north-dipping flank of the anticline also (Figure 1). Consequently, Yowlumne Unit B was created to flood the flank accumulation (Burzlaff,[2] Metz and Whitworth[3]). Thus, the field is a combination structural-stratigraphic trap.

Flow units and reservoir compartments[edit]

More than 95% of production at Yowlumne field is from the Yowlumne Sandstone, a fan-shaped Stevens Sandstone body as much as 150 m (493 ft) thick (Figure 3). Bouma sequences evident in the cores from the field indicate deposition of this body by turbidity currents. Also, the Yowlumne Sandstune body is lens shaped in cross section and does not significantly incise underlying strata (Figure 4). Because large-scale channeling is absent, deposition was primarily as sheet sands transported by sediment-gravity flows.

Thin shales divide the fan into lobe-shaped reservoir layers (Figure 4). Five of these—the A, B, C, D, and E sands—produce oil from Unit B. The W sand is a basal sixth layer that is wet and isolated by pressure from over-lying sandstones. Layers A through E merge into homogenous, clean sandstone on the west margin of the fan, yet contain interbedded shale on the east. For example, the 16x-4 horizontal well on the west side (Figure 1) penetrates a thick interval of clean sandstone (Marino and Schultz[4]). By contrast, the 73x-3 well on the east side (Figure 1) penetrates shale layers, some of which are two or more meters thick, interbedded with the reservoir sandstones.

Well-log correlations and 3-D seismic data indicate downlap within the fan, with basinward progradation to the north and lateral progradation to the west (Figure 4, Figure 5). In other words, lobe-shaped, shale-bounded reservoir layers in Unit B step to the left when facing basinward, in the direction of sediment transport (Jessup and Kamerling;[5] Clark et al.[6]). Thus, the basal productive layer (sand E) is thickest on the right (east) side of the fan, whereas the top layer (sand A) is thickest on the left (west).

Variations in reservoir pressures and injection of radioactive tracers indicate weak compartmentalization of the reservoir, which results in separate permeability pathways along which fluids flow at different rates (Metz and Whitworth, their figure 9;[3] Berg and Royo[7]). Most likely, these pathways represent different flow units that, for the most part, are in pressure communication over geologic time. Consequently, these compartments, which correlate to the shale-bounded, lobe-shaped reservoir layers already discussed, develop the same oil-water contact over thousands of years yet acquire slightly different pressures as the field is rapidly produced over tens of years.


References[edit]

  1. Graham, S. A., and L. A. Williams, 1985, Tectonic, depositional, and diagenetic history of Monterey Formation (Miocene), central San Juaquin Basin, California: AAPG Bulletin, v. 69, p. 385-411.
  2. Burzlaff, A. A., 1983, Unitizing and waterflooding the California Yowlumne oil field: Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 11685, p. 187-194.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Metz, R. T., and J. L. Whitworth, 1984, Yowlumne oil field, in G. W. Kendall and S. C. Kiser, eds., Selected papers presented to San Joaquin Geological Society, v. 6, p. 3-23. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Metzandwhitworth_1984" defined multiple times with different content
  4. Marino, A. W., and S. M. Schultz, 1992, Case study of Stevens sand horizontal well: Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 24910, p. 549-563.
  5. Jessup, D. D., and M. Kamerling, 1991, Depositional style of the Yowlumne sands, Yowlumne oil field, southern San Joaquin Basin, California (abs.): AAPG Bulletin, v. 75, p. 368.
  6. Clark, M. S., J. Melvin, and M. Kamerling, 1996, Growth patterns of a Miocene turbidite complex in an active-margin basin, Yowlumne field, San Joaquin Basin, California (abs.): AAPG Annual Convention Official Program, San Diego, 1996, v. 5, p. A27.
  7. Berg,

External links[edit]

find literature about
Yowlumne field
Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Google button.png