10,323
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: − +
Using conventional well logs to estimate richness (view source)
Revision as of 20:32, 7 July 2016
, 20:32, 7 July 2016no edit summary
[[file:evaluating-source-rocks_fig6-3.png|300px|thumb|{{figure number|2}}Composite log of the Upper Jurassic Hanifa limestone in the Middle East. From Meyer and Nederlof.<ref name=Meyerandnederlof_1984 />]]
[[file:evaluating-source-rocks_fig6-3.png|300px|thumb|{{figure number|2}}Composite log of the Upper Jurassic Hanifa limestone in the Middle East. From Meyer and Nederlof.<ref name=Meyerandnederlof_1984 />]]
The composite log in [[:file:evaluating-source-rocks_fig6-3.png|Figure 2]] of the Upper Jurassic Hanifa limestone in the Middle East displays a typical response of organic matter in a limestone section. No shale is present in this interval. Note the high gamma ray and resistivity readings. Core analysis of this well indicates the source rock (indicated by dots with dashes through them) is mature and generating oil.
The composite log in [[:file:evaluating-source-rocks_fig6-3.png|Figure 2]] of the Upper Jurassic Haifa [[limestone]] in the Middle East displays a typical response of organic matter in a limestone section. No shale is present in this interval. Note the high gamma ray and resistivity readings. Core analysis of this well indicates the source rock (indicated by dots with dashes through them) is mature and generating oil.
==Limitations==
==Limitations==