1,705
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Initial import
{{publication
| image = exploring-for-oil-and-gas-traps.png
| width = 120px
| series = Treatise in Petroleum Geology
| title = Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps
| part = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
| chapter = Exploring for structural traps
| frompg = 20-1
| topg = 20-70
| author = R.A. Nelson, T.L. Patton, S. Serra
| link = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch20/ch20.htm
| pdf =
| store = http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=545
| isbn = 0-89181-602-X
}}
==Definition==
A structural domain is an areally distinct region or subregion with similar structural properties (e.g., similar fold vergence or style, shortening, uplift, faulting style, etc.).
==Identifying structural domains==
Once a prospective tectonic setting is identified, we can determine where to focus exploration within that setting. This can be done most effectively by defining the boundaries and internal structural character of the different structural domains within the tectonic setting.
Among different tectonic settings, the number and complexity of the structural domains can vary significantly. For example, the number and character of the structural domains defined in a basin forming in the cratonic interior in a relatively quiet but long-lived tectonic setting contrast significantly to those defined in a short-lived but intense rifting event.
==Tools to define structural domains==
Within a particular tectonic setting, a significant number of markedly different domains may exist. Our ability to define the domains depends on the data available and the scale of observation. The following data sources can help define the boundaries and describe the internal complexity of structural domains:
* [[Potential fields]]
* Satellite imagery and/or aerial photography
* Regional surface and subsurface geologic data
* Exploration [[seismic data]]
* Deep crustal seismic data
* Reconnaissance outcrop studies
==Assessing potential==
Once the structural domain is defined and described, we must assess its potential to satisfy the play concept criteria. Some of the more obvious issues center around structural style:
* Fold styles
* Fault–fold relationships
* Fault spacing and interaction
* Fault fabrics
* Fault scaling
* Shortening–uplift ratios
Characterizing the structural domains lets us look at specific domains relative to the hydrocarbon system and thereby identify prospective structural fairways.
==See also==
* [[Workflow to find a prospect]]
* [[Schematic overview]]
* [[Tectonic setting]]
* [[Prospective structural fairways]]
* [[Lead/Prospect delineation]]
* [[Location selection]]
* [[Thrust belt example]]
==External links==
{{search}}
* [http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch20/ch20.htm Original content in Datapages]
* [http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=545 Find the book in the AAPG Store]
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]]
[[Category:Exploring for structural traps]]
| image = exploring-for-oil-and-gas-traps.png
| width = 120px
| series = Treatise in Petroleum Geology
| title = Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps
| part = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
| chapter = Exploring for structural traps
| frompg = 20-1
| topg = 20-70
| author = R.A. Nelson, T.L. Patton, S. Serra
| link = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch20/ch20.htm
| pdf =
| store = http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=545
| isbn = 0-89181-602-X
}}
==Definition==
A structural domain is an areally distinct region or subregion with similar structural properties (e.g., similar fold vergence or style, shortening, uplift, faulting style, etc.).
==Identifying structural domains==
Once a prospective tectonic setting is identified, we can determine where to focus exploration within that setting. This can be done most effectively by defining the boundaries and internal structural character of the different structural domains within the tectonic setting.
Among different tectonic settings, the number and complexity of the structural domains can vary significantly. For example, the number and character of the structural domains defined in a basin forming in the cratonic interior in a relatively quiet but long-lived tectonic setting contrast significantly to those defined in a short-lived but intense rifting event.
==Tools to define structural domains==
Within a particular tectonic setting, a significant number of markedly different domains may exist. Our ability to define the domains depends on the data available and the scale of observation. The following data sources can help define the boundaries and describe the internal complexity of structural domains:
* [[Potential fields]]
* Satellite imagery and/or aerial photography
* Regional surface and subsurface geologic data
* Exploration [[seismic data]]
* Deep crustal seismic data
* Reconnaissance outcrop studies
==Assessing potential==
Once the structural domain is defined and described, we must assess its potential to satisfy the play concept criteria. Some of the more obvious issues center around structural style:
* Fold styles
* Fault–fold relationships
* Fault spacing and interaction
* Fault fabrics
* Fault scaling
* Shortening–uplift ratios
Characterizing the structural domains lets us look at specific domains relative to the hydrocarbon system and thereby identify prospective structural fairways.
==See also==
* [[Workflow to find a prospect]]
* [[Schematic overview]]
* [[Tectonic setting]]
* [[Prospective structural fairways]]
* [[Lead/Prospect delineation]]
* [[Location selection]]
* [[Thrust belt example]]
==External links==
{{search}}
* [http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch20/ch20.htm Original content in Datapages]
* [http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=545 Find the book in the AAPG Store]
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]]
[[Category:Exploring for structural traps]]