10,323
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + + + Line 19:
Line 22: − + − − [[file:exploring-for-stratigraphic-traps_fig21-4.png|thumb|{{figure number|21-4}}. Copyright: Sarg, 1988; courtesy SEPM.]]
Seismic scale importance (view source)
Revision as of 19:33, 22 January 2014
, 19:33, 22 January 2014no edit summary
| isbn = 0-89181-602-X
| isbn = 0-89181-602-X
}}
}}
[[file:exploring-for-stratigraphic-traps_fig21-4.png|left|thumb|{{figure number|1}}. Copyright: Sarg, 1988; courtesy SEPM.]]
==Scale and data type==
==Scale and data type==
==Scale and trap detection==
==Scale and trap detection==
Scale makes a difference in ease of detection and, hence, affects risk. In the figures below, Pennsylvanian carbonate reef margin depositional sequences from the Delaware and Paradox basins, U.S.A., are compared. Note the difference in scale and how it affects [[seismic interpretation]]. Seismic detection of the Paradox basin traps is much more difficult because of the wavelength of the seismic wave vs. the reservoir thickness.
Scale makes a difference in ease of detection and, hence, affects risk. In [[:file:exploring-for-stratigraphic-traps_fig21-4.png|Figure 1]], Pennsylvanian carbonate reef margin depositional sequences from the Delaware and Paradox basins, U.S.A., are compared. Note the difference in scale and how it affects [[seismic interpretation]]. Seismic detection of the Paradox basin traps is much more difficult because of the wavelength of the seismic wave vs. the reservoir thickness.
==See also==
==See also==