Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| | | |
| ==Rock densities== | | ==Rock densities== |
− | The range of densities for all rock types (igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary) is typically 1.60–3.20 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. The density values of sedimentary rocks typically range from 1.80 to 2.80 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. Thus, small variations of density in sedimentary rocks may be invisible to the method. A5–10% error in estimating subsurface densities from gravity is quite common. This is in contrast to [[magnetics]], where typically there are orders of magnitude variations in susceptibilities. | + | The range of densities for all rock types ([[igneous]], metamorphic, and sedimentary) is typically 1.60–3.20 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. The density values of sedimentary rocks typically range from 1.80 to 2.80 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. Thus, small variations of density in sedimentary rocks may be invisible to the method. A5–10% error in estimating subsurface densities from gravity is quite common. This is in contrast to [[magnetics]], where typically there are orders of magnitude variations in susceptibilities. |
| | | |
| ==Horizontal layers== | | ==Horizontal layers== |
− | Horizontal layers have no anomalous gravity response. Thus, it is impossible to determine the subsurface density distribution if there are no lateral changes. Layer-cake geology yields no anomalous gravity signal. A bed is considered infinite and horizontal if it is about five times wider in all directions than it is thick, with no [[dip]]. | + | Horizontal layers have no anomalous gravity response. Thus, it is impossible to determine the subsurface density distribution if there are no [[lateral]] changes. Layer-cake geology yields no anomalous gravity signal. A bed is considered infinite and horizontal if it is about five times wider in all directions than it is thick, with no [[dip]]. |
| | | |
| ==Interpretation ranges== | | ==Interpretation ranges== |
Line 37: |
Line 37: |
| | | |
| ==Depth-to-basement determination== | | ==Depth-to-basement determination== |
− | Gravity is not as good at depth-to-basement or depth-to-density anomaly estimations as other geophysical methods. Though possible to do, it is often difficult to determine the appropriate depth to geologic source unless other constraints exist. | + | Gravity is not as good at depth-to-basement or depth-to-density anomaly estimations as other [[geophysical methods]]. Though possible to do, it is often difficult to determine the appropriate depth to geologic source unless other constraints exist. |
| | | |
| ==Positions of geologic bodies== | | ==Positions of geologic bodies== |
Line 64: |
Line 64: |
| [[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]] | | [[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]] |
| [[Category:Applying gravity in petroleum exploration]] | | [[Category:Applying gravity in petroleum exploration]] |
| + | [[Category:Treatise Handbook 3]] |