Changes

[[File:M91FG197.JPG|thumb|300px|{{figure number|3}}High-frequency carbonate cycle on a meter scale from the Mississippian Madison Formation in the Wind River Basin of Wyoming (after Westphal et al.).<ref name=Westphal>Westphal, H., G. P. Eberli, L. B. Smith, G. M. Grammer, and J. Kislak, 2004, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/2004/04apr/0405/0405.HTM Reservoir characterization of the Mississippian Madison Formation, Wind River basin, Wyoming]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 88, no. 4, p. 405–432</ref>]]

[[File:M91FG197.JPG|thumb|300px|{{figure number|3}}High-frequency carbonate cycle on a meter scale from the Mississippian Madison Formation in the Wind River Basin of Wyoming (after Westphal et al.).<ref name=Westphal>Westphal, H., G. P. Eberli, L. B. Smith, G. M. Grammer, and J. Kislak, 2004, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/2004/04apr/0405/0405.HTM Reservoir characterization of the Mississippian Madison Formation, Wind River basin, Wyoming]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 88, no. 4, p. 405–432</ref>]]

Carbonate sediments tend to show a ribbon-like geometry and are less commonly developed as widespread sheets. Examples of both geometries are shown by two of the major carbonate reservoir intervals in the Middle East.<ref>Ehrenberg, S. N., P. H. Nadeau, and A. A. M. Aqrawi, 2007, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/2007/03mar/BLTN06054/BLTN06054.HTM A comparison of Khuff and Arab reservoir potential throughout the Middle East]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 91, no. 3, p. 275–286</ref> Sediments of the Permian–Triassic Khuff Formation were deposited on a very low relief shelf, sheltered from the open ocean by a barrier reef. These show a layer-cake geometry consisting of interbedded mudstones and fine-grained grainstones.<ref>Alsharhan, A. S., 2006, Sedimentological character and hydrocarbon parameters of the middle Permian to Early Triassic Khuff Formation, United Arab Emirates: GeoArabia, v. 11, p. 121–158.</ref> By contrast, sedimentation in the Jurassic Arab Formation occurred on a shelf differentiated into shallow shoals and intrashelf basins. These exhibit a progradational geometry.<ref>Meyer, F. O., and R. C. Price, 1992, A new Arab-D depositional model, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia: Presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers 8th Middle East Oil Show, SPE Paper 25576, 10 p.</ref>

Carbonate sediments tend to show a ribbon-like geometry and are less commonly developed as widespread sheets. Examples of both geometries are shown by two of the major carbonate reservoir intervals in the Middle East.<ref>Ehrenberg, S. N., P. H. Nadeau, and A. A. M. Aqrawi, 2007, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/2007/03mar/BLTN06054/BLTN06054.HTM A comparison of Khuff and Arab reservoir potential throughout the Middle East]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 91, no. 3, p. 275–286</ref> Sediments of the Permian–Triassic Khuff Formation were deposited on a very low relief shelf, sheltered from the open ocean by a barrier reef. These show a layer-cake geometry consisting of interbedded [[mudstones]] and fine-grained grainstones.<ref>Alsharhan, A. S., 2006, Sedimentological character and hydrocarbon parameters of the middle Permian to Early Triassic Khuff Formation, United Arab Emirates: GeoArabia, v. 11, p. 121–158.</ref> By contrast, sedimentation in the Jurassic Arab Formation occurred on a shelf differentiated into shallow shoals and intrashelf basins. These exhibit a progradational geometry.<ref>Meyer, F. O., and R. C. Price, 1992, A new Arab-D depositional model, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia: Presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers 8th Middle East Oil Show, SPE Paper 25576, 10 p.</ref>

Carbonate sediments with ribbon geometries show a complex [[lateral]] facies progression in map view. A tendency for lateral accretion in successive cycles creates a subtle shingled geometry, which can make accurate correlation difficult ([[:File:M91FG67.JPG|Figure 2]]). For example, laterally accreting grainstones show a shingled geometry on a kilometer scale in Albian carbonates in northern Mexico ([[:File:M91FG196.JPG|Figure 1]]).<ref name=Osleger /> It can be a mistake to fit a layer-cake geometry to these systems because this results in reservoir models where lateral connectivity is predicted to be more extensive than is the case.<ref>Tinker, S. W., 1996, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1994-96/data/pg/0080/0004/0450/0460.htm Building the 3-D jigsaw puzzle, applications of sequence stratigraphy to 3-D reservoir characterization, Permian Basin]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 80, no. 4, p. 460–484.</ref> Facies belts may be difficult to define as [[lithofacies]] variation in carbonates is frequently transitional rather than sharp.

Carbonate sediments with ribbon geometries show a complex [[lateral]] facies progression in map view. A tendency for lateral accretion in successive cycles creates a subtle shingled geometry, which can make accurate correlation difficult ([[:File:M91FG67.JPG|Figure 2]]). For example, laterally accreting grainstones show a shingled geometry on a kilometer scale in Albian carbonates in northern Mexico ([[:File:M91FG196.JPG|Figure 1]]).<ref name=Osleger /> It can be a mistake to fit a layer-cake geometry to these systems because this results in reservoir models where lateral connectivity is predicted to be more extensive than is the case.<ref>Tinker, S. W., 1996, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1994-96/data/pg/0080/0004/0450/0460.htm Building the 3-D jigsaw puzzle, applications of sequence stratigraphy to 3-D reservoir characterization, Permian Basin]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 80, no. 4, p. 460–484.</ref> Facies belts may be difficult to define as [[lithofacies]] variation in carbonates is frequently transitional rather than sharp.

The shelf interior in carbonate systems commonly shoals to a tidal flat environment that may be extensive in area ([[:File:M91FG199.JPG|Figure 5]]). The highest porosities and permeabilities are found in the subtidal to intertidal facies with the best reservoir quality in tidal channel sediments. Supratidal sediments show the poorest reservoir quality and are typically barriers to vertical flow.<ref name=Shinn /> In arid environments, supratidal sabkha may be found. The evaporites can act as internal seals.<ref>Wilson, J. L., 1980, A review of carbonate reservoirs, in A. D. Miall, ed., Facts and principles of world petroleum occurrence: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 6, p. 95–115.</ref>

The shelf interior in carbonate systems commonly shoals to a tidal flat environment that may be extensive in area ([[:File:M91FG199.JPG|Figure 5]]). The highest porosities and permeabilities are found in the subtidal to intertidal facies with the best reservoir quality in tidal channel sediments. Supratidal sediments show the poorest reservoir quality and are typically barriers to vertical flow.<ref name=Shinn /> In arid environments, supratidal sabkha may be found. The evaporites can act as internal seals.<ref>Wilson, J. L., 1980, A review of carbonate reservoirs, in A. D. Miall, ed., Facts and principles of world petroleum occurrence: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 6, p. 95–115.</ref>

Tidal flat mudstones can be extensively dolomitized to form significant reservoir intervals. Examples of this are found in reservoirs of the Ordovician Ellenburger Formation in the United States, the Ordovician Red River Formation of the Williston basin, the Permian Basin carbonates of Texas, and the Cretaceous offshore of west Africa.

Tidal flat mudstones can be extensively dolomitized to form significant reservoir intervals. Examples of this are found in reservoirs of the Ordovician Ellenburger Formation in the United States, the Ordovician Red River Formation of the Williston basin, the [[Permian Basin]] carbonates of Texas, and the Cretaceous offshore of west Africa.

==Karstification and paleocave systems==

==Karstification and paleocave systems==