Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:     
==Evidence==
 
==Evidence==
 +
 +
[[file:evaluating-top-and-fault-seal_fig10-44.png|thumb|{{figure number|1}}. Copyright: Esso Exploration and Production, U.K.]]
 +
 
Evidence for hydraulic fracturing and seal rupture include the following:
 
Evidence for hydraulic fracturing and seal rupture include the following:
   Line 26: Line 29:  
* Cores show vertical, open extension fractures rather than the more common shear fractures found in adjacent fields. These fractures are identical to fractures produced by hydraulic fracturing.
 
* Cores show vertical, open extension fractures rather than the more common shear fractures found in adjacent fields. These fractures are identical to fractures produced by hydraulic fracturing.
   −
Figure 10-44 shows that the pore pressure is close to the fracture pressure at the base of the top seal (approximately [[depth::1300 ft]]). The pore pressure is inferred from mud weight and RFT measurements (solid dots). Leak-off tests (LOT) help constrain the fracture pressure. The fracture pressure is close to the lithostatic pressure or overburden pressure.
+
[[:file:evaluating-top-and-fault-seal_fig10-44.png|Figure 1]] shows that the pore pressure is close to the fracture pressure at the base of the top seal (approximately [[depth::1300 ft]]). The pore pressure is inferred from mud weight and RFT measurements (solid dots). Leak-off tests (LOT) help constrain the fracture pressure. The fracture pressure is close to the lithostatic pressure or overburden pressure.
 
  −
[[file:evaluating-top-and-fault-seal_fig10-44.png|thumb|{{figure number|10-44}}. Copyright: Esso Exploration and Production, U.K.]]
      
==See also==
 
==See also==

Navigation menu