Difference between revisions of "Oil correlation case histories"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(from book) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | There are two critical features of successful correlations. | |
# Use genetic correlative features, that is, features that result from original source rock input and not from secondary processes such as maturation, migration, or biodegradation. | # Use genetic correlative features, that is, features that result from original source rock input and not from secondary processes such as maturation, migration, or biodegradation. | ||
# Use a diverse set of correlation criteria from among the arsenal of available tools to avoid misinterpretations arising from the use of a single parameter. | # Use a diverse set of correlation criteria from among the arsenal of available tools to avoid misinterpretations arising from the use of a single parameter. | ||
− | The four case histories are from published literature. Only selected aspects of the full studies are discussed | + | The four case histories listed here are from published literature. Only selected aspects of the full studies are discussed; refer to the original literature for details. |
* [[Oil correlation case history: Zala basin, Hungary]] | * [[Oil correlation case history: Zala basin, Hungary]] | ||
* [[Oil correlation case history: Brazilian offshore basins]] | * [[Oil correlation case history: Brazilian offshore basins]] |
Revision as of 21:03, 3 March 2014
There are two critical features of successful correlations.
- Use genetic correlative features, that is, features that result from original source rock input and not from secondary processes such as maturation, migration, or biodegradation.
- Use a diverse set of correlation criteria from among the arsenal of available tools to avoid misinterpretations arising from the use of a single parameter.
The four case histories listed here are from published literature. Only selected aspects of the full studies are discussed; refer to the original literature for details.