Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:  
==Identifying the occurrence of difficult lithologies==
 
==Identifying the occurrence of difficult lithologies==
   −
[[file:difficult-lithologies_fig1.png|thumb|{{figure number|1}}M-N crossplot for mineral identification. Copyright: Schlumberger Well Services, 1979.]]
+
[[file:difficult-lithologies_fig1.png|thumb|{{figure number|1}}M-N crossplot for mineral identification. © Schlumberger Well Services, 1979.]]
    
The occurrence of difficult lithologies can be identified from the following sources:
 
The occurrence of difficult lithologies can be identified from the following sources:
Line 29: Line 29:  
* Analysis of log responses
 
* Analysis of log responses
   −
The methods to determine the occurrence of difficult lithologies from the first six sources just listed are not covered in this article. (For information on these sources, see “[[Mudlogging: Drill cuttings analysis]]” and “[[Mudlogging: The mudlog]]”; also see “[[Core description]]”.)
+
The methods to determine the occurrence of difficult lithologies from the first six sources just listed are not covered in this article. (For information on these sources, see “[[Mudlogging: drill cuttings analysis]]” and “[[Mudlogging: the mudlog]]”; also see “[[Core description]]”.)
    
Identifying the occurrence of difficult lithologies from logs can be formidable. Two crossplot techniques are commonly used to identify the occurrence of mineralogies: (1) the M-N crossplot and (2) the MID crossplot.
 
Identifying the occurrence of difficult lithologies from logs can be formidable. Two crossplot techniques are commonly used to identify the occurrence of mineralogies: (1) the M-N crossplot and (2) the MID crossplot.

Navigation menu