Difference between revisions of "Seal capacity and two-phase hydrocarbon columns"

From AAPG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Initial import)
 
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{merge|Seal capacity}}
 +
 
{{publication  
 
{{publication  
 
  | image  = exploring-for-oil-and-gas-traps.png
 
  | image  = exploring-for-oil-and-gas-traps.png
Line 6: Line 8:
 
  | part    = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
 
  | part    = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
 
  | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal
 
  | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal
  | frompg  = 10-1
+
  | frompg  = 10-79
  | topg    = 10-94
+
  | topg    = 10-79
 
  | author  = Grant M. Skerlec
 
  | author  = Grant M. Skerlec
 
  | link    = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch10/ch10.htm
 
  | link    = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch10/ch10.htm
Line 16: Line 18:
 
==Two phases are better than one==
 
==Two phases are better than one==
  
Seal capacity depends on both the hydrocarbon phase and the physical character of the top seal. Since displacement pressure is a function of the seal and the coefficient of interfacial tension of the hydrocarbon phase beneath the seal, it is possible to trap a thicker two-phase hydrocarbon column than oil alone or gas alone.<ref name=ch10r92>Watts, N., L., 1987, Theoretical aspects of cap-rock and fault seals for single and two-phase hydrocarbon columns: Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 274–307., 10., 1016/0264-8172(87)90008-0</ref> The gas in contact with the base of the seal determines the displacement pressure (P<sub>d)</sub> of the seal. The buoyant effect of the oil column, however, is less than that of a pure gas column, and a greater total hydrocarbon column can be trapped.
+
[[Seal capacity]] depends on both the hydrocarbon phase and the physical character of the top seal. Since [[Top seal displacement pressure|displacement pressure]] is a function of the seal and the [[coefficient of interfacial tension]] of the [[hydrocarbon phase]] beneath the seal, it is possible to trap a thicker two-phase hydrocarbon column than oil alone or gas alone.<ref name=ch10r92>Watts, N., L., 1987, Theoretical aspects of cap-rock and fault seals for single and two-phase hydrocarbon columns: Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 274–307., 10., 1016/0264-8172(87)90008-0</ref> The gas in contact with the base of the seal determines the [[displacement pressure]] (P<sub>d)</sub> of the seal. The [[Buoyancy forces in reservoir fluids|buoyant effect]] of the oil column, however, is less than that of a pure gas column, and a greater total [[hydrocarbon column]] can be trapped.
  
 
==Single phase vs. two phase==
 
==Single phase vs. two phase==
The following figure compares the seal capacity of a top seal with a single-phase oil accumulation, a single-phase gas accumulation, and a two-phase accumulation with both an oil leg and a gas cap. The largest hydrocarbon column is sealed by the two-phase accumulation. This best applies to traps with a geometry such that only the gas column is in contact with the seal. It also applies to fault traps.
 
  
[[file:evaluating-top-and-fault-seal_fig10-52.png|thumb|{{figure number|10-52}}After .<ref name=ch10r92 /> Copyright: Marine and Petroleum Geology.]]
+
[[file:evaluating-top-and-fault-seal_fig10-52.png|300px|thumb|{{figure number|1}}Comparison of the seal capacity of a top seal with a single-phase oil accumulation, a single-phase gas accumulation, and a two-phase accumulation with both an oil leg and a gas cap. After Watts.<ref name=ch10r92 /> Copyright: Marine and Petroleum Geology.]]
 +
 
 +
[[:file:evaluating-top-and-fault-seal_fig10-52.png|Figure 1]] compares the [[seal capacity]] of a top seal with a single-phase oil [[accumulation]], a single-phase gas accumulation, and a two-phase accumulation with both an [http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_oil_leg_reservoir oil leg] and a [http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Terms/g/gas_cap.aspx gas cap]. The largest [[hydrocarbon column]] is sealed by the two-phase accumulation. This best applies to [[trap]]s with a geometry such that only the gas column is in contact with the seal. It also applies to [[Fault trap regime|fault traps]].
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
* [[Seal capacity]]
 
* [[Seal capacity]]
 
* [[Seal capacity of different rock types]]
 
* [[Seal capacity of different rock types]]
* [[Variation in seal capacity with depth and hydrocarbon phase]]
+
* [[Seal capacity variation with depth and hydrocarbon phase]]
 
* [[Seal thickness]]
 
* [[Seal thickness]]
 
* [[Fault-dependent leak points, continuity, and charge]]
 
* [[Fault-dependent leak points, continuity, and charge]]
Line 40: Line 43:
 
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]]  
 
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]]  
 
[[Category:Evaluating top and fault seal]]
 
[[Category:Evaluating top and fault seal]]
 +
[[Category:Treatise Handbook 3]]

Latest revision as of 20:56, 31 March 2022

Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps
Series Treatise in Petroleum Geology
Part Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
Chapter Evaluating top and fault seal
Author Grant M. Skerlec
Link Web page
Store AAPG Store

Two phases are better than one

Seal capacity depends on both the hydrocarbon phase and the physical character of the top seal. Since displacement pressure is a function of the seal and the coefficient of interfacial tension of the hydrocarbon phase beneath the seal, it is possible to trap a thicker two-phase hydrocarbon column than oil alone or gas alone.[1] The gas in contact with the base of the seal determines the displacement pressure (Pd) of the seal. The buoyant effect of the oil column, however, is less than that of a pure gas column, and a greater total hydrocarbon column can be trapped.

Single phase vs. two phase

Figure 1 Comparison of the seal capacity of a top seal with a single-phase oil accumulation, a single-phase gas accumulation, and a two-phase accumulation with both an oil leg and a gas cap. After Watts.[1] Copyright: Marine and Petroleum Geology.

Figure 1 compares the seal capacity of a top seal with a single-phase oil accumulation, a single-phase gas accumulation, and a two-phase accumulation with both an oil leg and a gas cap. The largest hydrocarbon column is sealed by the two-phase accumulation. This best applies to traps with a geometry such that only the gas column is in contact with the seal. It also applies to fault traps.

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Watts, N., L., 1987, Theoretical aspects of cap-rock and fault seals for single and two-phase hydrocarbon columns: Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 274–307., 10., 1016/0264-8172(87)90008-0

External links

find literature about
Seal capacity and two-phase hydrocarbon columns
Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Google button.png