Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:  
The presence of a fault is a common interpretation of a magnetic increase or decrease. This interpretation assumes the fault throw, which changes the elevation to the top of basement, is the cause of the anomaly. It also assumes uniform lithology and uniform magnetic susceptibility of basement across a fault. Given this (usually incorrect) assumption, we can calculate the depth of the fault and its throw from the shape and amplitude of an observed magnetic curve. If we do not know the exact susceptibility, we can calculate a series of curves to establish a range of probable values of the throw. In all cases, the magnetic high necessarily appears on the upthrown side of the fault.
 
The presence of a fault is a common interpretation of a magnetic increase or decrease. This interpretation assumes the fault throw, which changes the elevation to the top of basement, is the cause of the anomaly. It also assumes uniform lithology and uniform magnetic susceptibility of basement across a fault. Given this (usually incorrect) assumption, we can calculate the depth of the fault and its throw from the shape and amplitude of an observed magnetic curve. If we do not know the exact susceptibility, we can calculate a series of curves to establish a range of probable values of the throw. In all cases, the magnetic high necessarily appears on the upthrown side of the fault.
   −
In the hypothetical cross section in [[:file:using-magnetics-in-petroleum-exploration_fig14-6.png|Figure 1]], basement rock has the same susceptibility across the fault.
+
In the hypothetical [[cross section]] in [[:file:using-magnetics-in-petroleum-exploration_fig14-6.png|Figure 1]], basement rock has the same susceptibility across the fault.
    
==Lithologic changes due to a fault==
 
==Lithologic changes due to a fault==
4,231

edits

Navigation menu