1,298
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + + + − * Were perforated * Had DSTs * Had RSTs * Had mud log shows Annotate the intervals with the results.+ Line 37:
Line 41: + + + − * Are productive * Had shows * Are potential reservoirs Annotate the log intervals with S<sub>w</sub> values.+ Line 45:
Line 52: − + − + −
Petrophysical analysis of lithofacies (view source)
Revision as of 16:48, 23 January 2014
, 16:48, 23 January 2014nested bullets etc
| 2
| 2
| On structural cross sections, plot intervals that …
| On structural cross sections, plot intervals that …
* Were perforated
* Had DSTs
* Had RSTs
* Had mud log shows
Annotate the intervals with the results.
|-
|-
| 3
| 3
| 4
| 4
| Calculate water saturation (S<sub>w</sub> ) of intervals that …
| Calculate water saturation (S<sub>w</sub> ) of intervals that …
* Are productive
* Had shows
* Are potential reservoirs
Annotate the log intervals with S<sub>w</sub> values.
|-
|-
| 5
| 5
| 6
| 6
| Analyze the fluid data in the context of the petrophysical data.
| Analyze the fluid data in the context of the petrophysical data.
* Do S<sub>w</sub> values, shows, and fluid pressures make sense in context with other geological data, including hydrocarbon column height?
* Do S<sub>w</sub> values, shows, and fluid pressures make sense in context with other geological data, including hydrocarbon column height? * Do the shows or S<sub>w</sub> values indicate the presence of an updip or downdip trap?
* Do the shows or S<sub>w</sub> values indicate the presence of an updip or downdip trap?
|-
|-
| 7
| 7