Changes

The reason for the very large size of some carbonate reservoirs is not surprising when one considers the sheer scale of even modern-day carbonate settings. The shallow submerged platform area of the Bahamas extends more than 400 km (248 mi) north–south and covers an area of about 125,000 km2 (48,263 mi2). The size of individual sediment bodies on the Bahama Banks can be impressive too (Figure 196). The Joulters Cay ooid shoal is a single carbonate sand body with a mobile border 25 km (15 mi) long and between 0.5 and 2 km (0.3 and 1.2 mi) wide (Major et al., 1996).

The reason for the very large size of some carbonate reservoirs is not surprising when one considers the sheer scale of even modern-day carbonate settings. The shallow submerged platform area of the Bahamas extends more than 400 km (248 mi) north–south and covers an area of about 125,000 km2 (48,263 mi2). The size of individual sediment bodies on the Bahama Banks can be impressive too (Figure 196). The Joulters Cay ooid shoal is a single carbonate sand body with a mobile border 25 km (15 mi) long and between 0.5 and 2 km (0.3 and 1.2 mi) wide (Major et al., 1996).

[[File:M91FG196|thumb|300px|{{figure number|1}}Ooid shoal, Bahamas; the bottom edge of the photograph represents a 4.5-km (2.7 mi)-wide transect. The lower inset is an illustration of a cliff exposure of laterally accreting (shingled) oolites from the Lower Cretaceous of Northern Mexico (from Osleger, 2004). Reprinted with permission from the AAPG.]]

[[File:M91FG196.JPG|thumb|300px|{{figure number|1}}Ooid shoal, Bahamas; the bottom edge of the photograph represents a 4.5-km (2.7 mi)-wide transect. The lower inset is an illustration of a cliff exposure of laterally accreting (shingled) oolites from the Lower Cretaceous of Northern Mexico (from Osleger, 2004). Reprinted with permission from the AAPG.]]

==Carbonates are different from sandstones==

==Carbonates are different from sandstones==

==Geometry==

==Geometry==

[[File:M91FG67|thumb|300px|{{figure number|2}}]]

[[File:M91FG67.JPG|thumb|300px|{{figure number|2}}]]

Carbonate sediments tend to show a ribbon-like geometry and are less commonly developed as widespread sheets. Examples of both geometries are shown by two of the major carbonate reservoir intervals in the Middle East (Ehrenberg et al., 2007). Sediments of the Permian–Triassic Khuff Formation were deposited on a very low relief shelf, sheltered from the open ocean by a barrier reef. These show a layer-cake geometry consisting of interbedded mudstones and fine-grained grainstones (Alsharhan, 2006). By contrast, sedimentation in the Jurassic Arab Formation occurred on a shelf differentiated into shallow shoals and intrashelf basins. These exhibit a progradational geometry (Meyer and Price, 1992).

Carbonate sediments tend to show a ribbon-like geometry and are less commonly developed as widespread sheets. Examples of both geometries are shown by two of the major carbonate reservoir intervals in the Middle East (Ehrenberg et al., 2007). Sediments of the Permian–Triassic Khuff Formation were deposited on a very low relief shelf, sheltered from the open ocean by a barrier reef. These show a layer-cake geometry consisting of interbedded mudstones and fine-grained grainstones (Alsharhan, 2006). By contrast, sedimentation in the Jurassic Arab Formation occurred on a shelf differentiated into shallow shoals and intrashelf basins. These exhibit a progradational geometry (Meyer and Price, 1992).

Vertically, carbonates can be characterized by high-frequency stacking, with shoaling-upward cycles a few meters thick. Westphal et al. (2004) described high-frequency depositional cycles from the Mississippian Madison Formation in the Wind River Basin of Wyoming. The cycles occur over a meter-scale thickness and consist of a lower transgressive and an upper regressive hemicycle. The transgressive hemicycle is dominated by tidal flat sediments (laminated mudstone and wackestone) and subtidal deposits (e.g., stromatilites). The regressive hemicycle comprises high-energy carbonate sand-shoal facies (Figure 197).

Vertically, carbonates can be characterized by high-frequency stacking, with shoaling-upward cycles a few meters thick. Westphal et al. (2004) described high-frequency depositional cycles from the Mississippian Madison Formation in the Wind River Basin of Wyoming. The cycles occur over a meter-scale thickness and consist of a lower transgressive and an upper regressive hemicycle. The transgressive hemicycle is dominated by tidal flat sediments (laminated mudstone and wackestone) and subtidal deposits (e.g., stromatilites). The regressive hemicycle comprises high-energy carbonate sand-shoal facies (Figure 197).

[[File:M91FG197|thumb|300px|{{figure number|3}}High-frequency carbonate cycle on a meter scale from the Mississippian Madison Formation in the Wind River Basin of Wyoming (after Westphal et al., 2004). Reprinted with permission from the AAPG.]]

[[File:M91FG197.JPG|thumb|300px|{{figure number|3}}High-frequency carbonate cycle on a meter scale from the Mississippian Madison Formation in the Wind River Basin of Wyoming (after Westphal et al., 2004). Reprinted with permission from the AAPG.]]

High-frequency upward-shoaling cycles commonly comprise individual hydraulic or flow units within carbonate reservoirs (Kerans et al., 1994). Porosity variation in carbonate reservoirs occurs at the scale of high-frequency cycles (Ehrenberg, 2004). Larger scale trends in porosity variation can also occur at the systems tract or sequence level (Ehrenberg et al., 2006).

High-frequency upward-shoaling cycles commonly comprise individual hydraulic or flow units within carbonate reservoirs (Kerans et al., 1994). Porosity variation in carbonate reservoirs occurs at the scale of high-frequency cycles (Ehrenberg, 2004). Larger scale trends in porosity variation can also occur at the systems tract or sequence level (Ehrenberg et al., 2006).

Barrier reefs form thick massive sheets or ribbons parallel to the shoreline (Figure 198). Some of these can be very long, up to many tens of kilometers in length. The reef is the result of the growth of the calcareous framework created by the reef-forming organisms. This framework is interspersed with sands, silts, and muds that have formed from the erosion of the reef by biological activity and the occasional storm. The reefs themselves can act as a source of sediment, which may either be transported landward or seaward. The back reef can show impressive areas of skeletal sand deposition up to several kilometers wide. Localized patch reefs are also found here. Reef aprons form seaward from the reef and are composed of silt to boulder-size debris, derived from the reef front. The reef apron sediments can be stabilized or encrusted by in-situ fore reef biota such as foraminifera, sponges, or algae.

Barrier reefs form thick massive sheets or ribbons parallel to the shoreline (Figure 198). Some of these can be very long, up to many tens of kilometers in length. The reef is the result of the growth of the calcareous framework created by the reef-forming organisms. This framework is interspersed with sands, silts, and muds that have formed from the erosion of the reef by biological activity and the occasional storm. The reefs themselves can act as a source of sediment, which may either be transported landward or seaward. The back reef can show impressive areas of skeletal sand deposition up to several kilometers wide. Localized patch reefs are also found here. Reef aprons form seaward from the reef and are composed of silt to boulder-size debris, derived from the reef front. The reef apron sediments can be stabilized or encrusted by in-situ fore reef biota such as foraminifera, sponges, or algae.

[[File:M91FG198|thumb|300px|{{figure number|4}}Barrier reef, Bahamas. The back reef between the barrier reef and the shoreline is 700 m (2296 ft) wide.]]

[[File:M91FG198.JPG|thumb|300px|{{figure number|4}}Barrier reef, Bahamas. The back reef between the barrier reef and the shoreline is 700 m (2296 ft) wide.]]

Barrier reef reservoirs are found in major oil fields such as the Oligocene to upper Eocene Kirkuk field of Iraq or the Lower Cretaceous fields found in the Golden Lane of Mexico (Viniegra-O and Castillo-Tejero, 1970).

Barrier reef reservoirs are found in major oil fields such as the Oligocene to upper Eocene Kirkuk field of Iraq or the Lower Cretaceous fields found in the Golden Lane of Mexico (Viniegra-O and Castillo-Tejero, 1970).

Pelagic chalk on the seabed is easily disturbed and remobilized. Clean chalk lacks any significant sediment cohesion as it has no unbalanced interparticle electric charges or platy interlocking grains to hold it together (Bramwell et al., 1999). Processes tending to redeposit chalk include debris flows, turbidity currents, slumps, and slides (Figure 200) (Kennedy, 1987).

Pelagic chalk on the seabed is easily disturbed and remobilized. Clean chalk lacks any significant sediment cohesion as it has no unbalanced interparticle electric charges or platy interlocking grains to hold it together (Bramwell et al., 1999). Processes tending to redeposit chalk include debris flows, turbidity currents, slumps, and slides (Figure 200) (Kennedy, 1987).

[[File:M91FG200|thumb|300px|{{figure number|6}}Redeposited chalk provides the main reservoir intervals in chalk fields. Resedimentation processes include sliding, slumping, debris flows, turbidity currents, and creep (from Surlyk et al., 2003). Reprinted with permission from the Geological Society.]]

[[File:M91FG200.JPG|thumb|300px|{{figure number|6}}Redeposited chalk provides the main reservoir intervals in chalk fields. Resedimentation processes include sliding, slumping, debris flows, turbidity currents, and creep (from Surlyk et al., 2003). Reprinted with permission from the Geological Society.]]

Redeposited, allochthonous chalk typically shows much better porosities and permeabilities compared to autochthonous chalk in the same interval. The rock properties are thought to have been enhanced by several processes (Kennedy, 1987; Taylor and Lapre, 1987):

Redeposited, allochthonous chalk typically shows much better porosities and permeabilities compared to autochthonous chalk in the same interval. The rock properties are thought to have been enhanced by several processes (Kennedy, 1987; Taylor and Lapre, 1987):