Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:     
==Nonreservoir pore geometry and pore type==
 
==Nonreservoir pore geometry and pore type==
In contrast to the vuggy packstone facies, the porous [[mudstone]] facies displays poor permeability (5 md or less), even though porosity can be as high as 30% (points 1 and 5, group B in Figure 9-102). This is because the porosity is pinpoint vugs isolated within fine intercrystalline meso- to microporosity formed by silt-sized (10μ or less) dolomite rhombs. [[Capillary pressure]] and SEM data indicate the pore throats are less than 1μ in radius, with an abundance of pore throats about 0.5μ in radius or smaller (see Figure 9-100). Port size puts much of this rock in micropore type. While localized lenses of porous mudstone have as much as 30% porosity and 20 md permeability, these probably are laterally isolated from each other.
+
In contrast to the [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vug vuggy] [[packstone]] facies, the porous [[mudstone]] facies displays poor [[permeability]] (5 md or less), even though porosity can be as high as 30% (points 1 and 5, group B in Figure 9-102). This is because the porosity is pinpoint vugs isolated within fine intercrystalline [[Wikipedia:Mesoporous material|meso]]- to [[Wikipedia:Microporous material|microporosity]] formed by silt-sized (10μ or less) dolomite rhombs. [[Capillary pressure]] and [[Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)|SEM]] data indicate the pore throats are less than 1μ in radius, with an abundance of pore throats about 0.5μ in radius or smaller (see Figure 9-100). Port size puts much of this rock in micropore type. While localized lenses of porous mudstone have as much as 30% porosity and 20 md permeability, these probably are laterally isolated from each other.
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
4,231

edits

Navigation menu