− | Conventional well logs are useful for estimating source rock richness both qualitatively and quantitatively. Well logs allow a qualitative identification of organic-rich formations and a quantitative analysis of the amount of organic matter. The advantages of using well logs over cuttings are continuous sampling, more accurate depth control, and greater vertical resolution.<ref name=ch06r7>Herron, S., L., 1991, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/geochem1/data/a037/a037/0001/0100/0127.htm In situ evaluation of potential source rocks by wireline logs], in Merrill, R., K., ed., Source and Migration Processes and Evaluation Techniques: [http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=436 AAPG Treatise of Petroleum Geology, Handbook of Petroleum Geology No. 1], p. 127–134.</ref> | + | [[Well types#Conventional wells|Conventional well]] logs are useful for estimating source rock richness both qualitatively and quantitatively. Well logs allow a qualitative identification of organic-rich formations and a quantitative analysis of the amount of organic matter. The advantages of using well logs over cuttings are continuous sampling, more accurate depth control, and greater vertical resolution.<ref name=ch06r7>Herron, S., L., 1991, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/geochem1/data/a037/a037/0001/0100/0127.htm In situ evaluation of potential source rocks by wireline logs], in Merrill, R., K., ed., Source and Migration Processes and Evaluation Techniques: [http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=436 AAPG Treatise of Petroleum Geology, Handbook of Petroleum Geology No. 1], p. 127–134.</ref> |