Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
links; clear before see also
Line 16: Line 16:     
==Scale and data type==
 
==Scale and data type==
   
[[file:exploring-for-stratigraphic-traps_fig21-4.png|left|thumb|{{figure number|1}}. Copyright: Sarg, 1988; courtesy SEPM.]]
 
[[file:exploring-for-stratigraphic-traps_fig21-4.png|left|thumb|{{figure number|1}}. Copyright: Sarg, 1988; courtesy SEPM.]]
   Line 22: Line 21:     
==Scale and trap detection==
 
==Scale and trap detection==
Scale makes a difference in ease of detection and, hence, affects risk. In [[:file:exploring-for-stratigraphic-traps_fig21-4.png|Figure 1]], Pennsylvanian carbonate reef margin depositional sequences from the Delaware and Paradox basins, U.S.A., are compared. Note the difference in scale and how it affects [[seismic interpretation]]. Seismic detection of the Paradox basin traps is much more difficult because of the wavelength of the seismic wave vs. the reservoir thickness.
+
Scale makes a difference in ease of detection and, hence, affects risk. In [[:file:exploring-for-stratigraphic-traps_fig21-4.png|Figure 1]], Pennsylvanian ({{Ma|Pennsylvanian}}) carbonate reef margin depositional sequences from the [[Delaware basin|Delaware]] and [[Paradox basin]]s, U.S.A., are compared. Note the difference in scale and how it affects [[seismic interpretation]]. Seismic detection of the Paradox basin traps is much more difficult because of the wavelength of the seismic wave vs. the reservoir thickness.
    +
{{clear}}
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
* [[Stratigraphic trap]]s
 
* [[Stratigraphic trap]]s

Navigation menu