When a checkshot survey well penetrates formations that exhibit complicated structural [[dip]]s, it is advisable to position an energy source on both the updip and downdip sides of the well so that two different traveltime measurements are acquired at each receiver depth. One of the travel paths is usually a better approximation of a straight line than the other. For example, in [[:file:checkshots-and-vertical-seismic-profiles_fig3.png|Figure 3]], source position A is preferred when the receiver is at depth ''Z''<sub>1</sub> but source position B is the better choice for a receiver at depth ''Z''<sub>2</sub>. Usually, the traveltimes measured for sources A and B are simply averaged at each receiver depth because the structural dips and formation velocities are rarely known with enough precision to predetermine which travel path is the better approximation of a straight line. | When a checkshot survey well penetrates formations that exhibit complicated structural [[dip]]s, it is advisable to position an energy source on both the updip and downdip sides of the well so that two different traveltime measurements are acquired at each receiver depth. One of the travel paths is usually a better approximation of a straight line than the other. For example, in [[:file:checkshots-and-vertical-seismic-profiles_fig3.png|Figure 3]], source position A is preferred when the receiver is at depth ''Z''<sub>1</sub> but source position B is the better choice for a receiver at depth ''Z''<sub>2</sub>. Usually, the traveltimes measured for sources A and B are simply averaged at each receiver depth because the structural dips and formation velocities are rarely known with enough precision to predetermine which travel path is the better approximation of a straight line. |