Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:  
| 2
 
| 2
 
| Apply this relationship to predict the generation zones for this specific kerogen in wells with similar thermal and burial histories in the basin for which maturity data are available.
 
| Apply this relationship to predict the generation zones for this specific kerogen in wells with similar thermal and burial histories in the basin for which maturity data are available.
 +
|}
 +
 +
==Comparison and maturity measures==
 +
 +
The table below shows examples of the relationships between [[Petroleum generation|hydrocarbon generation]] zones, maturity, and transformation ratio for standard types II and III kerogens, based on a specific burial and thermal history model. The most significant difference is in the depth to the onset of oil generation, where [[depth::1000 m]] separates the top of the oil windows of these two kerogen types.
 +
 +
{| class = "wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
! Hydrocarbon generation zone
 +
! Vitrinite refl., % R<sub>o</sub>, Type II
 +
! Vitrinite refl., % R<sub>o</sub>, Type III
 +
! Transformation ratio, %, Type II
 +
! Transformation ratio, %, Type III
 +
! Present-day depth, m, Type II
 +
! Present-day depth, m, Type III
 +
|-
 +
| Onset oil
 +
| 0.55
 +
| 0.85
 +
| 5
 +
| 12
 +
| 2200
 +
| 3200
 +
|-
 +
| Onset peak rate generation
 +
| 0.65
 +
| 1.00
 +
| 17
 +
| 31
 +
| 2600
 +
| 3500
 +
|-
 +
| Onset gas/cracking liquids
 +
| 0.95
 +
| 1.35
 +
| 88
 +
| 64
 +
| 3400
 +
| 4050
 
|}
 
|}
  

Navigation menu