Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| | part = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps | | | part = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps |
| | chapter = Applying magnetotellurics | | | chapter = Applying magnetotellurics |
− | | frompg = 16-1 | + | | frompg = 16-4 |
− | | topg = 16-12 | + | | topg = 16-4 |
| | author = Arnie Ostrander | | | author = Arnie Ostrander |
| | link = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch16/ch16.htm | | | link = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch16/ch16.htm |
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| | isbn = 0-89181-602-X | | | isbn = 0-89181-602-X |
| }} | | }} |
− | Magnetotellurics (MT) is an electrical geophysical technique that measures the resistivity of the subsurface. Although MT cannot provide the resolution of [[Seismic data|seismic surveys]], it is less expensive and, more importantly, can be used in places where seismic data collection is impractical or gives poor results. This is the same physical parameter that is measured in a borehole resis- tivity log. | + | Magnetotellurics (MT) is an electrical geophysical technique that measures the [[Electrical_methods#Electrical_properties_of_materials|resistivity]] of the subsurface. Although MT cannot provide the resolution of [[Seismic data|seismic surveys]], it is less expensive and, more importantly, can be used in places where seismic data collection is impractical or gives poor results. This is the same physical parameter that is measured in a borehole [[Basic_open_hole_tools#Resistivity|resistivity log]]. |
| | | |
− | ==How MT differs from electric logs== | + | ==How magnetotellurics differs from electric logs== |
| | | |
− | [[Applying-magnetotellurics fig16-1.png|thumb|{{figure number|1}} Simplified relationship between a lithologic log, an electric log, an MT sounding, and an inversion run using the MT sounding data.]] | + | [[File:Applying-magnetotellurics fig16-1.png|thumbnail|300px|{{figure number|1}}Simplified relationship between a lithologic log, an electric log, an MT sounding, and an inversion run using the MT sounding data.]] |
| | | |
| MT differs from an inductive electric log in three major ways: | | MT differs from an inductive electric log in three major ways: |
Line 33: |
Line 33: |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | [[:Applying-magnetotellurics fig16-1.png|Figure 1]] shows the simplified relationship between a lithologic log, an electric log, an MT sounding, and an inversion run using the MT sounding data. We can also take electric log data and run a forward MT model to produce an MT sounding curve. | + | [[:file:Applying-magnetotellurics fig16-1.png|Figure 1]] shows the simplified relationship between a lithologic log, an electric log, an MT sounding, and an inversion run using the MT sounding data. We can also take electric log data and run a forward MT model to produce an MT sounding curve. |
| | | |
| ==Subsurface layers resolved== | | ==Subsurface layers resolved== |
− | Subsurface layers are resolved by inverse modeling of MT data acquired across a spec- trum of frequencies, as illustrated in [[:Applying-magnetotellurics fig16-1.png|Figure 1]]. | + | Subsurface layers are resolved by inverse modeling of MT data acquired across a spectrum of frequencies, as illustrated in [[:file:Applying-magnetotellurics fig16-1.png|Figure 1]]. |
| | | |
− | ==MT resolution== | + | ==Magnetotellurics resolution== |
− | The rule-of-thumb for MT resolution for depth of burial vs. layer thickness is 10:1. For example, to “see” a layer at a depth of 1,500 m (5,000 ft), the thickness of the layer needs to be approximately 150 m (500 ft) or more. Low-resistivity layers are more easily delineated than high-resistivity layers. It is difficult for MT to resolve more than three or four subsurface layers. | + | The rule of thumb for MT resolution of depth of burial vs. layer thickness is 10:1. For example, to “see” a layer at a depth of 1,500 m (5,000 ft), the thickness of the layer needs to be approximately 150 m (500 ft) or more. Low-resistivity layers are more easily delineated than high-resistivity layers. It is difficult for MT to resolve more than three or four subsurface layers. |
| | | |
| ==See also== | | ==See also== |
− | * [[What is magnetotellurics (MT)?]] | + | * [[Magnetotellurics survey measurements]] |
− | * [[What does an MT survey measure?]]
| + | * [[Magnetotelluric data acquisition]] |
− | * [[How are MT data acquired?]] | + | * [[Magnetotellurics case history: frontier basin analysis (Amazon Basin, Colombia)]] |
− | * [[Case history: frontier basin analysis (Amazon Basin, Colombia)]] | + | * [[Magnetotellurics case history: rugged carbonate terrain (Highlands of Papua New Guinea)]] |
− | * [[Case history: rugged carbonate terrain (Highlands of Papua New Guinea)]] | + | * [[Magnetotellurics case history: Precambrian overthrust (Northwestern Colorado)]] |
− | * [[Case history: Precambrian overthrust (Northwestern Colorado)]] | + | * [[Magnetotellurics case history: volcanic terrain (Columbia River Plateau)]] |
− | * [[Case history: volcanic terrain (Columbia River Plateau)]] | |
| | | |
| ==External links== | | ==External links== |
Line 57: |
Line 56: |
| [[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]] | | [[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]] |
| [[Category:Applying magnetotellurics]] | | [[Category:Applying magnetotellurics]] |
| + | [[Category:Treatise Handbook 3]] |