10,323
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: − + − + − + − +
Systems tracts identification (view source)
Revision as of 20:58, 28 July 2014
, 20:58, 28 July 2014→Methods
==Methods==
==Methods==
<gallery mode=packed heights=200px widths=200px>
<gallery mode=packed heights=200px widths=200px>
file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-19.png|{{figure number|1}}Seismic reflection profile rom the East Breaks field area, illustrating both clinoform and parallel reflection patterns in late Pleistocene sediments immediately below the sea floor (between two sets of bold arrows). Three listric growth faults (down arrows) cut through the clinoforms. Modified from Armentrout (1993); courtesy Gulf Coast SEPM.
file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-19.png|{{figure number|1}}Seismic reflection profile rom the East Breaks field area, illustrating both clinoform and parallel reflection patterns in late Pleistocene sediments immediately below the sea floor (between two sets of bold arrows). Three listric growth faults (down arrows) cut through the clinoforms. Modified from Armentrout;<ref name=ch04r8 /> courtesy Gulf Coast SEPM.
file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-21.png|{{figure number|2}}Seismic reflection profile from the High Island South Addition area, GOM basin, 20 mi east of the East Breaks shelf-margin delta. From Armentrout (1993, 1996); courtesy Gulf Coast SEPM and Geological Society of London.
file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-21.png|{{figure number|2}}Seismic reflection profile from the High Island South Addition area, GOM basin, 20 mi east of the East Breaks shelf-margin delta. From Armentrout<ref name=ch04r8 />, 1996); courtesy Gulf Coast SEPM and Geological Society of London.
</gallery>
</gallery>
<gallery mode=packed heights=300px widths=300px>
<gallery mode=packed heights=300px widths=300px>
file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-22.png|{{figure number|3}}Interpretation template for log motif analysis. From Armentrout et al. (1993); courtesy The Geological Society of London.
file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-22.png|{{figure number|3}}Interpretation template for log motif analysis. From Armentrout et al.;<ref name=ch04r8 /> courtesy The Geological Society of London.
file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-20.png|{{figure number|4}}Contrast of the abundance of sinistral (s) ''Globorotalia menardii (G. menardii)'' and ''Globorotalia inflata (G. inflate)'' in each sample. From Armentrout (1993, 1996); courtesy Gulf Coast SEPM and Geological Society of London.
file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-20.png|{{figure number|4}}Contrast of the abundance of sinistral (s) ''Globorotalia menardii (G. menardii)'' and ''Globorotalia inflata (G. inflate)'' in each sample. From Armentrout<ref name=ch04r8 />, 1996); courtesy Gulf Coast SEPM and Geological Society of London.
file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-23.png|{{figure number|5}}Histogram. From Armentrout (1991, 1996); courtesy Springer-Verlag, Geological Society of London.
file:sedimentary-basin-analysis_fig4-23.png|{{figure number|5}}Histogram. From Armentrout (1991, 1996); courtesy Springer-Verlag, Geological Society of London.
</gallery>
</gallery>