Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 43: Line 43:     
==Nomenclature problems==
 
==Nomenclature problems==
These scale differences result in nomenclature problems. The High Island–East Breaks shelf-margin delta (Figures 4-19, 4-21) fits a type 2 sequence criterion of Vail and Todd<ref name=ch04r100 />) because it represents a lowstand prograding complex at the same position as preceding shelf-edge depositional breaks. As such, this lowstand is part of a type 2 depositional sequence and would be called a shelf-margin systems tract. If the criteria of Van Wagoner et al.<ref name=ch04r70 />) are used, the High Island–East Breaks shelf-margin delta would be called a type 1 lowstand prograding complex because the preceding shoreline break is tens of miles further north on the Texas shelf. Clarification of such scale-dependent reference points is critical to effective communication through the careful selection of precise labels for elements of depositional sequences.
+
These scale differences result in nomenclature problems. The High Island–East Breaks shelf-margin delta (Figures 4-19, 4-21) fits a type 2 sequence criterion of Vail and Todd<ref name=ch04r100 />) because it represents a lowstand [[Depocenter#Sediment_supply_rate_and_facies_patterns|prograding]] complex at the same position as preceding shelf-edge depositional breaks. As such, this lowstand is part of a type 2 depositional sequence and would be called a shelf-margin systems tract. If the criteria of Van Wagoner et al.<ref name=ch04r70 />) are used, the High Island–East Breaks shelf-margin delta would be called a type 1 lowstand prograding complex because the preceding shoreline break is tens of miles further north on the Texas shelf. Clarification of such scale-dependent reference points is critical to effective communication through the careful selection of precise labels for elements of depositional sequences.
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
4,231

edits

Navigation menu