1,705
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Structural lead and prospect delineation (view source)
Revision as of 15:18, 22 January 2014
, 15:18, 22 January 2014Initial import
{{publication
| image = exploring-for-oil-and-gas-traps.png
| width = 120px
| series = Treatise in Petroleum Geology
| title = Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps
| part = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
| chapter = Exploring for structural traps
| frompg = 20-1
| topg = 20-70
| author = R.A. Nelson, T.L. Patton, S. Serra
| link = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch20/ch20.htm
| pdf =
| store = http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=545
| isbn = 0-89181-602-X
}}
==Prospect identification==
A structural lead becomes a prospect once we determine that the major components of the hydrocarbon system have sufficient probabilities of success in contributing to an economic accumulation of hydrocarbons in the structure. In the table below are examples of some structural technical issues to consider when assessing the [[petroleum system]] relative to a structural lead. Many companies use a mixture of these issues to assess exploration risk, employing various numerical approaches.
{| class = "wikitable"
|-
! Element
! Factors Defining the Structural Prospect
|-
| Trap
| * Trap integrity (certainty of dip closure; integrity of the closure throughout the evolution of the structure) * Area/volume under closure (present closure; structural closure during migration)
|-
| Seal
| * Integrity of seals (continuity and integrity of top seal; integrity and capacity of fault seals)
|-
| Reservoir
| * Storage capacity (structural degradation or enhancement effects) * Deliverability (structurally induced enhancement or degradation of [[permeability]]) * Anisotropy (flow anisotropy due to faults, folds, or fracture facies variability) * Heterogeneity (local enhancement or degradation; fault isolation or compartmentalization) * Pressures (structurally induced overpressures)
|-
| Source facies
| * Maturation (structural overburden considerations; tectonic subsidence and uplift effects considered)
|-
| Expulsion/ migration
| * Structural pathways (charge areas have been in effective communication with prospects) * Structural gathering areas (sufficient volumes of migrating hydrocarbons captured and diverted into appropriate pathways) * Timing (structural pathways effective throughout generation/migration event)
|}
==Assessing technical issues==
The following data sources and techniques can help us assess some of these technical issues:
* Outcrop studies (interpretive analogs)
* Structure section balancing (structural geometry)
* Palinspastic restoration (migration pathways; paleostructure)
* Dipmeter and FMS analysis (structural geometry)
* Detailed seismic, 2-D and 3-D (structural geometry)
* [[Modeling]] studies (seismic; theoretical; physical; interpretive analogs)
* Hydrocarbon migration pathway analysis
* Fault-seal studies (trap integrity)
* Core analysis (fracture potential)
* Mechanical testing of rock (fracture potential)
* Petrofabric analysis
* Fracture analysis
* Curvature analysis (fracture potential)
* Mechanical testing (fracture potential)
* Special seismic processing and velocity analysis (e.g., prestack migration; amplitude vs. offset)
==When a lead becomes a prospect==
Once we determine that the risk in drilling for hydrocarbons on the structural anomaly is acceptable, the lead qualifies as a prospect. The next problem confronting the explo-rationist is picking an appropriate location on the prospect.
==See also==
* [[Workflow to find a prospect]]
* [[Schematic overview]]
* [[Tectonic setting]]
* [[Structural domains]]
* [[Prospective structural fairways]]
* [[Location selection]]
* [[Thrust belt example]]
==External links==
{{search}}
* [http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch20/ch20.htm Original content in Datapages]
* [http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=545 Find the book in the AAPG Store]
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]]
[[Category:Exploring for structural traps]]
| image = exploring-for-oil-and-gas-traps.png
| width = 120px
| series = Treatise in Petroleum Geology
| title = Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps
| part = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
| chapter = Exploring for structural traps
| frompg = 20-1
| topg = 20-70
| author = R.A. Nelson, T.L. Patton, S. Serra
| link = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch20/ch20.htm
| pdf =
| store = http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=545
| isbn = 0-89181-602-X
}}
==Prospect identification==
A structural lead becomes a prospect once we determine that the major components of the hydrocarbon system have sufficient probabilities of success in contributing to an economic accumulation of hydrocarbons in the structure. In the table below are examples of some structural technical issues to consider when assessing the [[petroleum system]] relative to a structural lead. Many companies use a mixture of these issues to assess exploration risk, employing various numerical approaches.
{| class = "wikitable"
|-
! Element
! Factors Defining the Structural Prospect
|-
| Trap
| * Trap integrity (certainty of dip closure; integrity of the closure throughout the evolution of the structure) * Area/volume under closure (present closure; structural closure during migration)
|-
| Seal
| * Integrity of seals (continuity and integrity of top seal; integrity and capacity of fault seals)
|-
| Reservoir
| * Storage capacity (structural degradation or enhancement effects) * Deliverability (structurally induced enhancement or degradation of [[permeability]]) * Anisotropy (flow anisotropy due to faults, folds, or fracture facies variability) * Heterogeneity (local enhancement or degradation; fault isolation or compartmentalization) * Pressures (structurally induced overpressures)
|-
| Source facies
| * Maturation (structural overburden considerations; tectonic subsidence and uplift effects considered)
|-
| Expulsion/ migration
| * Structural pathways (charge areas have been in effective communication with prospects) * Structural gathering areas (sufficient volumes of migrating hydrocarbons captured and diverted into appropriate pathways) * Timing (structural pathways effective throughout generation/migration event)
|}
==Assessing technical issues==
The following data sources and techniques can help us assess some of these technical issues:
* Outcrop studies (interpretive analogs)
* Structure section balancing (structural geometry)
* Palinspastic restoration (migration pathways; paleostructure)
* Dipmeter and FMS analysis (structural geometry)
* Detailed seismic, 2-D and 3-D (structural geometry)
* [[Modeling]] studies (seismic; theoretical; physical; interpretive analogs)
* Hydrocarbon migration pathway analysis
* Fault-seal studies (trap integrity)
* Core analysis (fracture potential)
* Mechanical testing of rock (fracture potential)
* Petrofabric analysis
* Fracture analysis
* Curvature analysis (fracture potential)
* Mechanical testing (fracture potential)
* Special seismic processing and velocity analysis (e.g., prestack migration; amplitude vs. offset)
==When a lead becomes a prospect==
Once we determine that the risk in drilling for hydrocarbons on the structural anomaly is acceptable, the lead qualifies as a prospect. The next problem confronting the explo-rationist is picking an appropriate location on the prospect.
==See also==
* [[Workflow to find a prospect]]
* [[Schematic overview]]
* [[Tectonic setting]]
* [[Structural domains]]
* [[Prospective structural fairways]]
* [[Location selection]]
* [[Thrust belt example]]
==External links==
{{search}}
* [http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch20/ch20.htm Original content in Datapages]
* [http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=545 Find the book in the AAPG Store]
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]]
[[Category:Exploring for structural traps]]