Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:  
}}
 
}}
 
In oil and gas industry, classifying carbonate rocks is a major step in core and thin section description. Two classification systems have been widely used in the industry:  
 
In oil and gas industry, classifying carbonate rocks is a major step in core and thin section description. Two classification systems have been widely used in the industry:  
# Folk (1959,1962) Classification  
+
# Folk (1959<ref name=Flk1959>Folk, R. L., 1959, [https://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1957-60/data/pg/0043/0001/0000/0001.htm Practical petrographic classification of limestones]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 43, p. 1–38.</ref>, 1962) Classification  
 
# Dunham (1962) Classification  
 
# Dunham (1962) Classification  
 
Both classifications provide an indication of depositional energy setting and reservoir quality.
 
Both classifications provide an indication of depositional energy setting and reservoir quality.
Line 14: Line 14:  
* Wentworth (1922){{note|a}} [a]
 
* Wentworth (1922){{note|a}} [a]
 
* Bramkamp & Powers (1958)
 
* Bramkamp & Powers (1958)
* Folk (1959,1962)
+
* Folk (1959<ref name=Flk1959 />,1962)
 
* Dunham (1962)
 
* Dunham (1962)
 
* Leignton & Pendexter (1962)
 
* Leignton & Pendexter (1962)
Line 21: Line 21:  
* Wright (1992)
 
* Wright (1992)
 
* Hallsworth & Knox (1999)
 
* Hallsworth & Knox (1999)
Among all of the attempts, Folk (1959, 1962) and Dunham (1962) extended by Embry & Klovan (1971) classifications were widely accepted.  
+
Among all of the attempts, Folk (1959<ref name=Flk1959 />, 1962) and Dunham (1962) extended by Embry & Klovan (1971) classifications were widely accepted.  
    
==Folk Classification==  
 
==Folk Classification==  
 
===Folk’s Criteria===
 
===Folk’s Criteria===
Folk classification system is based on three basic components of limestone:  
+
[[w:Folk classification|Folk's classification]] system is based on three basic components of limestone:  
 
* Allochems (sediment grains): framework component of the rock. There are four major types of allochems in Folk system: intraclasts, oolites, fossils, and pellets.  
 
* Allochems (sediment grains): framework component of the rock. There are four major types of allochems in Folk system: intraclasts, oolites, fossils, and pellets.  
 
* Microcrystalline lime mud: matrix component of the rock < 4 μm in size.  
 
* Microcrystalline lime mud: matrix component of the rock < 4 μm in size.  
Line 148: Line 148:     
==Notes==  
 
==Notes==  
:1. {{note|a}} ^[a] Early carbonate classification is grain-size based system: Calcilutite (grains < 63 μm), calcarenite (63 μm < grains < 2mm), calcirudite (grains > 2mm).   
+
# [a] Early carbonate classification is grain-size based system: Calcilutite (grains < 63 μm), calcarenite (63 μm < grains < 2mm), calcirudite (grains > 2mm).   
 
+
# [b] This family has restricted limits because cement by itself cannot form a rock and the supported framework component (allochems) has limited packing.
2. ^[b] This family has restricted limits because cement by itself cannot form a rock and the supported framework component (allochems) has limited packing.
+
# [c] If the microcrystalline limestone had been disturbed either by bioturbation or soft-sediment deformation, the term “disturbed microcrystalline limestone” or “dismicrite” could be assigned.   
 
+
# [d] Examples of biolithites are: algal biolithite and coral biolithite.  
3. ^[c] If the microcrystalline limestone had been disturbed either by bioturbation or soft-sediment deformation, the term “disturbed microcrystalline limestone” or “dismicrite” could be assigned.   
+
# [e] Naming of a subdivision is a composite of two parts. The first part refers to the name of the allochem. The second part refers to the family type. For Example, intrasparite: intra- refers to intraclasts, and –sparite refers to family I.       
 
+
# [f] Oosparites are more common than Oomicrites because the need of strong current to form these rocks.  
4. ^[d] Examples of biolithites are: algal biolithite and coral biolithite.  
+
# [g] Intrasparites are more common than intramicrites because the need of strong current to transfer course rock fragments.  
 
+
# [h] Both biosparites and biomicrites are common. However, biosparites are usually more rounded and abraded because of the strong current.  
5. ^[e] Naming of a subdivision is a composite of two parts. The first part refers to the name of the allochem. The second part refers to the family type. For Example, intrasparite: intra- refers to intraclasts, and –sparite refers to family I.       
+
# [i] The subdivisions could be applied considering other types of allochems: intraclasts, oolites, and pellets.  
 
+
# [j] The abundance of grains defines the nature of the framework. In other words, whether it is mud-supported or grain-supported.  
6. ^[f] Oosparites are more common than Oomicrites because the need of strong current to form these rocks.  
+
# [k] The term “boundstone” is retained if the organic bounding type is not recognized.   
 
  −
7. ^[g] Intrasparites are more common than intramicrites because the need of strong current to transfer course rock fragments.  
  −
 
  −
8. ^[h] Both biosparites and biomicrites are common. However, biosparites are usually more rounded and abraded because of the strong current.  
  −
 
  −
9. ^[i] The subdivisions could be applied considering other types of allochems: intraclasts, oolites, and pellets.  
  −
 
  −
10. ^[j] The abundance of grains defines the nature of the framework. In other words, whether it is mud-supported or grain-supported.  
  −
 
  −
11. ^[k] The term “boundstone” is retained if the organic bounding type is not recognized.   
  −
 
  −
==References==
  −
19. ^ [1] [2] [11] Folk, R. L., 1959, Practical petrographic classification of limestones: AAPG Bulletin, v. 43, p. 1–38.
      +
==References==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
20. ^ [3] [4] [5] [9] Folk Classification. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_classification#cite_ref-2
 
20. ^ [3] [4] [5] [9] Folk Classification. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_classification#cite_ref-2
  

Navigation menu