Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| }} | | }} |
| In oil and gas industry, classifying carbonate rocks is a major step in core and thin section description. Two classification systems have been widely used in the industry: | | In oil and gas industry, classifying carbonate rocks is a major step in core and thin section description. Two classification systems have been widely used in the industry: |
− | # Folk (1959,1962) Classification | + | # Folk (1959<ref name=Flk1959>Folk, R. L., 1959, [https://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1957-60/data/pg/0043/0001/0000/0001.htm Practical petrographic classification of limestones]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 43, p. 1–38.</ref>, 1962) Classification |
| # Dunham (1962) Classification | | # Dunham (1962) Classification |
| Both classifications provide an indication of depositional energy setting and reservoir quality. | | Both classifications provide an indication of depositional energy setting and reservoir quality. |
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| * Wentworth (1922){{note|a}} [a] | | * Wentworth (1922){{note|a}} [a] |
| * Bramkamp & Powers (1958) | | * Bramkamp & Powers (1958) |
− | * Folk (1959,1962) | + | * Folk (1959<ref name=Flk1959 />,1962) |
| * Dunham (1962) | | * Dunham (1962) |
| * Leignton & Pendexter (1962) | | * Leignton & Pendexter (1962) |
Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| * Wright (1992) | | * Wright (1992) |
| * Hallsworth & Knox (1999) | | * Hallsworth & Knox (1999) |
− | Among all of the attempts, Folk (1959, 1962) and Dunham (1962) extended by Embry & Klovan (1971) classifications were widely accepted. | + | Among all of the attempts, Folk (1959<ref name=Flk1959 />, 1962) and Dunham (1962) extended by Embry & Klovan (1971) classifications were widely accepted. |
| | | |
| ==Folk Classification== | | ==Folk Classification== |
| ===Folk’s Criteria=== | | ===Folk’s Criteria=== |
− | Folk classification system is based on three basic components of limestone: | + | [[w:Folk classification|Folk's classification]] system is based on three basic components of limestone: |
| * Allochems (sediment grains): framework component of the rock. There are four major types of allochems in Folk system: intraclasts, oolites, fossils, and pellets. | | * Allochems (sediment grains): framework component of the rock. There are four major types of allochems in Folk system: intraclasts, oolites, fossils, and pellets. |
| * Microcrystalline lime mud: matrix component of the rock < 4 μm in size. | | * Microcrystalline lime mud: matrix component of the rock < 4 μm in size. |
Line 148: |
Line 148: |
| | | |
| ==Notes== | | ==Notes== |
− | :1. {{note|a}} ^[a] Early carbonate classification is grain-size based system: Calcilutite (grains < 63 μm), calcarenite (63 μm < grains < 2mm), calcirudite (grains > 2mm).
| + | # [a] Early carbonate classification is grain-size based system: Calcilutite (grains < 63 μm), calcarenite (63 μm < grains < 2mm), calcirudite (grains > 2mm). |
− | | + | # [b] This family has restricted limits because cement by itself cannot form a rock and the supported framework component (allochems) has limited packing. |
− | 2. ^[b] This family has restricted limits because cement by itself cannot form a rock and the supported framework component (allochems) has limited packing.
| + | # [c] If the microcrystalline limestone had been disturbed either by bioturbation or soft-sediment deformation, the term “disturbed microcrystalline limestone” or “dismicrite” could be assigned. |
− | | + | # [d] Examples of biolithites are: algal biolithite and coral biolithite. |
− | 3. ^[c] If the microcrystalline limestone had been disturbed either by bioturbation or soft-sediment deformation, the term “disturbed microcrystalline limestone” or “dismicrite” could be assigned.
| + | # [e] Naming of a subdivision is a composite of two parts. The first part refers to the name of the allochem. The second part refers to the family type. For Example, intrasparite: intra- refers to intraclasts, and –sparite refers to family I. |
− | | + | # [f] Oosparites are more common than Oomicrites because the need of strong current to form these rocks. |
− | 4. ^[d] Examples of biolithites are: algal biolithite and coral biolithite.
| + | # [g] Intrasparites are more common than intramicrites because the need of strong current to transfer course rock fragments. |
− | | + | # [h] Both biosparites and biomicrites are common. However, biosparites are usually more rounded and abraded because of the strong current. |
− | 5. ^[e] Naming of a subdivision is a composite of two parts. The first part refers to the name of the allochem. The second part refers to the family type. For Example, intrasparite: intra- refers to intraclasts, and –sparite refers to family I.
| + | # [i] The subdivisions could be applied considering other types of allochems: intraclasts, oolites, and pellets. |
− | | + | # [j] The abundance of grains defines the nature of the framework. In other words, whether it is mud-supported or grain-supported. |
− | 6. ^[f] Oosparites are more common than Oomicrites because the need of strong current to form these rocks.
| + | # [k] The term “boundstone” is retained if the organic bounding type is not recognized. |
− | | |
− | 7. ^[g] Intrasparites are more common than intramicrites because the need of strong current to transfer course rock fragments.
| |
− | | |
− | 8. ^[h] Both biosparites and biomicrites are common. However, biosparites are usually more rounded and abraded because of the strong current.
| |
− | | |
− | 9. ^[i] The subdivisions could be applied considering other types of allochems: intraclasts, oolites, and pellets.
| |
− | | |
− | 10. ^[j] The abundance of grains defines the nature of the framework. In other words, whether it is mud-supported or grain-supported.
| |
− | | |
− | 11. ^[k] The term “boundstone” is retained if the organic bounding type is not recognized.
| |
− | | |
− | ==References==
| |
− | 19. ^ [1] [2] [11] Folk, R. L., 1959, Practical petrographic classification of limestones: AAPG Bulletin, v. 43, p. 1–38.
| |
| | | |
| + | ==References== |
| + | {{reflist}} |
| 20. ^ [3] [4] [5] [9] Folk Classification. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_classification#cite_ref-2 | | 20. ^ [3] [4] [5] [9] Folk Classification. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_classification#cite_ref-2 |
| | | |