Line 24: |
Line 24: |
| | | |
| These are generally referred to as '''kinetic parameters'''. They can be measured using various pyrolysis techniques and are different for each distinct kerogen analyzed. | | These are generally referred to as '''kinetic parameters'''. They can be measured using various pyrolysis techniques and are different for each distinct kerogen analyzed. |
| + | |
| + | [[file:evaluating-source-rocks_fig6-15.png|thumb|{{figure number|1}}. Copyright: results of Genex 1-D basin [[modeling]] software, courtesy Institute Français du Petrole.]] |
| | | |
| ==Hydrocarbon generation—depth and yield== | | ==Hydrocarbon generation—depth and yield== |
| The depth of hydrocarbon generation and the yield of individual hydrocarbon phases are primarily a function of the kinetics of the kerogen-hydrocarbon conversion. Burial history and catalytic effects, due to source rock matrix chemistry, affect the rate of generation, although these effects are secondary to the kinetic effects. | | The depth of hydrocarbon generation and the yield of individual hydrocarbon phases are primarily a function of the kinetics of the kerogen-hydrocarbon conversion. Burial history and catalytic effects, due to source rock matrix chemistry, affect the rate of generation, although these effects are secondary to the kinetic effects. |
| | | |
− | The following hydrocarbon generation vs. depth plots for types I (left) and III (right) kerogens are based on identical burial and thermal conditions. Thus, they depict the difference in the depth of hydrocarbon generation, based on kerogen type alone. Type I kerogen generally has a shallower liquid hydrocarbon zone and generates significantly larger amounts of hydrocarbons. The onset of generation is indicated by the change in the slope of the curves. | + | The following hydrocarbon generation vs. depth plots ([[file:evaluating-source-rocks_fig6-15.png|Figure 1]] for types I (left) and III (right) kerogens are based on identical burial and thermal conditions. Thus, they depict the difference in the depth of hydrocarbon generation, based on kerogen type alone. Type I kerogen generally has a shallower liquid hydrocarbon zone and generates significantly larger amounts of hydrocarbons. The onset of generation is indicated by the change in the slope of the curves. |
| | | |
− | [[file:evaluating-source-rocks_fig6-15.png|thumb|{{figure number|6-15}}. Copyright: results of Genex 1-D basin [[modeling]] software, courtesy Institute Français du Petrole.]] | + | [[file:evaluating-source-rocks_fig6-16.png|thumb|{{figure number|2}}See text for explanation.]] |
| | | |
| ==Timing hydrocarbon generation== | | ==Timing hydrocarbon generation== |
− | Variations in the kinetic parameters affect predictions of the present-day distribution of hydrocarbon generation zones and also influence when, in geologic time, a potential source interval generates. The figures below compare the timing of hydrocarbon generation from type I kerogen (left) to type III (right). The onset of hydrocarbon generation is indicated by the dramatic change in slope of the curves: 110-100 Ma for type I and 90-80 Ma for type III. The difference in timing shown in this example is based only on the different kinetic parameters of the kerogen types. | + | Variations in the kinetic parameters affect predictions of the present-day distribution of hydrocarbon generation zones and also influence when, in geologic time, a potential source interval generates. [[:file:evaluating-source-rocks_fig6-16.png|Figure 2]] compares the timing of hydrocarbon generation from type I kerogen (left) to type III (right). The onset of hydrocarbon generation is indicated by the dramatic change in slope of the curves: 110-100 Ma for type I and 90-80 Ma for type III. The difference in timing shown in this example is based only on the different kinetic parameters of the kerogen types. |
− | | |
− | [[file:evaluating-source-rocks_fig6-16.png|thumb|{{figure number|6-16}}See text for explanation.]]
| |
| | | |
| ==Recommendations== | | ==Recommendations== |