Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 43: Line 43:     
==Well 4==
 
==Well 4==
 +
 +
[[file:predicting-reservoir-system-quality-and-performance_fig9-92.png|thumb|{{figure number|2}}. Copyright: Hartmann and Coalson, 1990; courtesy RMAG.]]
 +
 
Well 4 hit the Morrow near the top of the oil column. It had the lowest saturations and best flow rates of all the wells studied, even though it had the thinnest reservoir. This is because it contained rock with large pore throats (r<sub>35</sub> up to 50μ) that was fully saturated with oil (S<sub>w</sub> = 25-30%). The well tested 230 bo/d and 387 Mcfg/d (37 m<sup>3</sup> oil and 11,000 m<sup>3</sup> gas per day). Initial production was 51 bo/d and 411 Mcfg/d (8 m<sup>3</sup> oil and 12,000 m<sup>3</sup> gas per day). The difference could be due to a loss of reservoir thickness near the well bore, judging from the thinness of the reservoir.
 
Well 4 hit the Morrow near the top of the oil column. It had the lowest saturations and best flow rates of all the wells studied, even though it had the thinnest reservoir. This is because it contained rock with large pore throats (r<sub>35</sub> up to 50μ) that was fully saturated with oil (S<sub>w</sub> = 25-30%). The well tested 230 bo/d and 387 Mcfg/d (37 m<sup>3</sup> oil and 11,000 m<sup>3</sup> gas per day). Initial production was 51 bo/d and 411 Mcfg/d (8 m<sup>3</sup> oil and 12,000 m<sup>3</sup> gas per day). The difference could be due to a loss of reservoir thickness near the well bore, judging from the thinness of the reservoir.
   −
The figure below summarizes the petrophysical characteristics of well 4.
+
[[:file:predicting-reservoir-system-quality-and-performance_fig9-92.png|Figure 2]] summarizes the petrophysical characteristics of well 4.
 
  −
[[file:predicting-reservoir-system-quality-and-performance_fig9-92.png|thumb|{{figure number|9-92}}. Copyright: Hartmann and Coalson, 1990; courtesy RMAG.]]
      
==Well 8==
 
==Well 8==

Navigation menu