Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| ! Characteristics | | ! Characteristics |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Sandstones | + | | colspan = 2 align=center | Sandstones |
− | |
| |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Primary intergranular | + | | Primary intergranular |
| | Interstitial void space between framework grains | | | Interstitial void space between framework grains |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Dissolution or vug | + | | Dissolution or vug |
| | Partial or complete dissolution of framework grains or cement | | | Partial or complete dissolution of framework grains or cement |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Micropores | + | | Micropores |
− | | Small pores mainly between detrital or authigenic clays; can also occur within grains (e.g., microporous chert) | + | | Small pores mainly between detrital or authigenic clays; can also occur within grains (e.g., microporous [[chert]]) |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Fracture | + | | [[Fracture]] |
| | Breakage due to earth stresses | | | Breakage due to earth stresses |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Carbonates | + | | colspan = 2 align=center | Carbonates |
− | |
| |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Interparticle | + | | Interparticle |
| | Pores between particles or grains | | | Pores between particles or grains |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Intraparticle | + | | Intraparticle |
| | Pores within individual particles or grains | | | Pores within individual particles or grains |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Intercrystal | + | | Intercrystal |
| | Pores between crystals | | | Pores between crystals |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Moldic | + | | Moldic |
| | Pores formed by dissolution of an individual grain or crystal in the rock | | | Pores formed by dissolution of an individual grain or crystal in the rock |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Fenestral | + | | Fenestral |
| | Primary pores larger than grain-supported interstices | | | Primary pores larger than grain-supported interstices |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Fracture | + | | [[Fracture]] |
| | Formed by a planar break in the rock | | | Formed by a planar break in the rock |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Vug | + | | Vug |
| | Large pores formed by indiscriminate dissolution of cements and grains | | | Large pores formed by indiscriminate dissolution of cements and grains |
| |} | | |} |
Line 72: |
Line 70: |
| ===Environment of deposition=== | | ===Environment of deposition=== |
| | | |
− | The initial pore network of newly deposited sediments and the quality of shallow buried reservoirs are generally determined by the environment of deposition (see [[Lithofacies and environmental analysis of clastic depositional systems]]). This dictates the grain characteristics, which in turn control porosity and permeability. In clastic rocks, these characteristics include grain size and sorting, sphericity, angularity, packing, and the abundance of matrix materials. The best reservoir quality rocks are well-sorted, have well-rounded grains, and contain no matrix material. | + | The initial pore network of newly deposited sediments and the quality of shallow buried reservoirs are generally determined by the environment of deposition (see [[Lithofacies and environmental analysis of clastic depositional systems]]). This dictates the grain characteristics, which in turn control porosity and permeability. In clastic rocks, these characteristics include [[grain size]] and [[Core_description#Maturity|sorting]], sphericity, angularity, packing, and the abundance of matrix materials. The best reservoir quality rocks are well-sorted, have well-rounded grains, and contain no matrix material. |
| | | |
− | Sedimentary structures affect initial reservoir quality by imparting a preferential flow pattern in the reservoir. Planar bedding, laminations, or other stratification features can create stratified planar flow, especially if permeability barriers such as clay partings, finer-grained laminae, or graded beds are present. Slump structures may reduce permeability by creating a tortuous flow path, or may increase permeability (and porosity) by causing a looser grain packing and by producing small faults. Bioturbation typically decreases reservoir quality by mixing adjacent sands and clays, introducing the clay into the interstices among the sand grains. | + | Sedimentary structures affect initial reservoir quality by imparting a preferential flow pattern in the reservoir. Planar bedding, laminations, or other stratification features can create stratified planar flow, especially if permeability barriers such as clay partings, finer-grained laminae, or graded beds are present. Slump structures may reduce permeability by creating a tortuous flow path, or may increase permeability (and porosity) by causing a looser grain packing and by producing small faults. [[Bioturbation]] typically decreases reservoir quality by mixing adjacent sands and clays, introducing the clay into the interstices among the sand grains. |
| | | |
| ===Diagenesis=== | | ===Diagenesis=== |
| | | |
− | During and following burial, diagenetic events will modify the original pore network of reservoir rocks (see [[Evaluating diagenetically complex reservoirs]]). Four main diagenetic mechanisms affect reservoir quality: compaction, cementation, dissolution, and recrystallization These mechanisms are controlled by the detrital composition of the rock, burial depth, burial time, burial temperature, pore fluids, and pore fluid pressure. | + | During and following burial, diagenetic events will modify the original pore network of reservoir rocks (see [[Evaluating diagenetically complex reservoirs]]). Four main diagenetic mechanisms affect reservoir quality: compaction, cementation, dissolution, and recrystallization. These mechanisms are controlled by the detrital composition of the rock, burial depth, burial time, burial temperature, pore fluids, and pore fluid pressure. |
| | | |
| ===Compaction=== | | ===Compaction=== |
| | | |
− | Compaction reduces the porosity and permeability of a rock by causing the following: (1) grain rotation and rearrangement into a tighter packing configuration, (2) plastic deformation of ductile grains that flow into adjacent pores and pore throats, (3) fracturing and crushing of brittle grains, and (4) pressure solution in the form of grain suturing and stylolitization.<ref name=pt06r84>McBride, E. F., 1984, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1984-85/data/pg/0068/0004/0500/0505.htm Compaction in sandstones—influence on reservoir quality]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 68, p. 505.</ref> Rocks that contain mechanically labile grains, such as clay clasts, altered rock fragments, or delicate fossils, are likely to experience a reduction in porosity and permeability as the ductile grains plastically flow into adjacent pore spaces. Brittle grains will fracture, shatter, or in the case of some fossils and porous grains, collapse. A rock that consists of a framework of strong minerals, such as quartz, tends to undergo only minor porosity and permeability reduction during compaction due to grain rotation and rearrangement into a tighter packing configuration. | + | Compaction reduces the porosity and permeability of a rock by causing the following: (1) grain rotation and rearrangement into a tighter packing configuration, (2) plastic [[deformation]] of [[Ductility|ductile]] grains that flow into adjacent pores and pore throats, (3) [[Fracture|fracturing]] and crushing of [[Brittleness|brittle]] grains, and (4) pressure solution in the form of grain suturing and stylolitization.<ref name=pt06r84>McBride, E. F., 1984, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1984-85/data/pg/0068/0004/0500/0505.htm Compaction in sandstones—influence on reservoir quality]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 68, p. 505.</ref> Rocks that contain mechanically labile grains, such as clay clasts, altered rock fragments, or delicate fossils, are likely to experience a reduction in porosity and permeability as the ductile grains plastically flow into adjacent pore spaces. Brittle grains will fracture, shatter, or in the case of some fossils and porous grains, collapse. A rock that consists of a framework of strong minerals, such as [[quartz]], tends to undergo only minor porosity and permeability reduction during compaction due to grain rotation and rearrangement into a tighter packing configuration. |
| | | |
| ===Cementation=== | | ===Cementation=== |
Line 92: |
Line 90: |
| |+ {{table number|2}}Common cements of sandstones and carbonates | | |+ {{table number|2}}Common cements of sandstones and carbonates |
| |- | | |- |
− | ! Cement | + | ! Cement || Common Crystal Form |
− | ! Common Crystal Form
| |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Quartz | + | | [[Quartz]] || Syntaxial overgrowth, prismatic |
− | | Syntaxial overgrowth, prismatic | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Calcite | + | | Calcite || Fibrous, bladed, granular, blocky, poikilotopic, syntaxial rim |
− | | Fibrous, bladed, granular, blocky, poikilotopic, syntaxial rim | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Dolomite | + | | [[Dolomite]] || Rhombohedral, blocky, granular |
− | | Rhombohedral, blocky, granular | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Anhydrite | + | | [[Anhydrite]] || Blocky, bladed |
− | | Blocky, bladed | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Gypsum | + | | [[Gypsum]] || Blocky, bladed, prismatic |
− | | Blocky, bladed, prismatic | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Feldspar | + | | Feldspar || Syntaxial overgrowth, prismatic |
− | | Syntaxial overgrowth, prismatic | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Siderite | + | | Siderite || Granular, blocky, bladed |
− | | Granular, blocky, bladed | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Zeolites | + | | Zeolites || Platy, bladed, fibrous, prismatic, blocky |
− | | Platy, bladed, fibrous, prismatic, blocky | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Kaolinite | + | | Kaolinite || Platy |
− | | Platy | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | lllite | + | | lllite || Fibrous |
− | | Fibrous | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Chlorite | + | | Chlorite || Platy |
− | | Platy | |
| |- | | |- |
− | | Smectite | + | | Smectite || Crenulate |
− | | Crenulate | |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 138: |
Line 123: |
| ===Recrystallization=== | | ===Recrystallization=== |
| | | |
− | Recrystallization of carbonates and the alteration of grains and cements to clays can have a significant impact on reservoir quality in sandstones and carbonates. Dolomitization of limestones or calcite cement in sandstones typically increases porosity and permeability. Similarly, clay replacement may increase overall porosity of the rock; however, the pores associated with clay minerals tend to be micropores that contain irreducible water. Also, delicate clay flakes may become mobile with flowing pore fluids and migrate to, and clog, pore throats. | + | Recrystallization of carbonates and the alteration of grains and cements to clays can have a significant impact on reservoir quality in sandstones and carbonates. Dolomitization of limestones or calcite cement in sandstones typically increases porosity and permeability. Similarly, clay replacement may increase overall porosity of the rock; however, the pores associated with clay minerals tend to be micropores that contain [http://petrowiki.org/Glossary%3AIrreducible_water_saturation irreducible water]. Also, delicate clay flakes may become mobile with flowing pore fluids and migrate to, and clog, pore throats. |
| | | |
| ===Structural deformation=== | | ===Structural deformation=== |
| | | |
− | Fracturing and brecciation associated with folds, faults, and diapirs generally increase the reservoir quality of well-indurated rocks (see [[Evaluating fractured reservoirs]]). Fracture porosity is typically low, usually providing only about 1% porosity; however, fractures in large reservoirs may hold considerable reserves. Fracture permeability may be as high as tens of darcies and is directional in nature. Conversely, fractures filled by mineralization or with gouge may produce a permeability barrier in the direction perpendicular to the fracture. Brecciation along fracture or fault zones may occur due to shearing or dissolution and collapse. Except where mineralization has occurred in the breccia, brecciation can increase both porosity and permeability considerably. Closely spaced sealing faults can significantly compartmentalize a reservoir. | + | [[Fracture|Fracturing]] and [[breccia]]tion associated with folds, faults, and [[diapirs]] generally increase the reservoir quality of well-indurated rocks (see [[Evaluating fractured reservoirs]]). [[Fracture]] porosity is typically low, usually providing only about 1% porosity; however, fractures in large reservoirs may hold considerable reserves. Fracture permeability may be as high as tens of darcies and is directional in nature. Conversely, fractures filled by mineralization or with gouge may produce a permeability barrier in the direction perpendicular to the fracture. Brecciation along fracture or fault zones may occur due to shearing or dissolution and collapse. Except where mineralization has occurred in the breccia, brecciation can increase both porosity and permeability considerably. Closely spaced sealing faults can significantly compartmentalize a reservoir. |
| | | |
− | ===[[Wettability]]=== | + | ===Wettability=== |
| | | |
− | Wettability in an oil reservoir controls reservoir quality by affecting the amount of water production. When the reservoir rock is oil-wet, water is located in the central portion of the pores and will flow through the pore system with the oil. Conversely, in a water-wet reservoir, the water is restricted to the perimeter of the pores and will not flow through the pore system until much of the oil has been removed. In addition, the irreducible water saturations of oil-wet reservoirs tend to be much lower than those of water-wet reservoirs. | + | [[Wettability]] in an oil reservoir controls reservoir quality by affecting the amount of water production. When the reservoir rock is oil-wet, water is located in the central portion of the pores and will flow through the pore system with the oil. Conversely, in a water-wet reservoir, the water is restricted to the perimeter of the pores and will not flow through the pore system until much of the oil has been removed. In addition, the irreducible water saturations of oil-wet reservoirs tend to be much lower than those of water-wet reservoirs. |
| | | |
− | ===[[Capillary pressure]]=== | + | ===Capillary pressure=== |
| | | |
| The [[capillary pressure]] of a reservoir affects the magnitude and distribution of water saturation and thus the hydrocarbon volume in a given reservoir area [[Leverett, 1941]]{{citation needed}}. The capillary pressure is a function of the capillary radius, the interfacial tension, and the contact angle between the water and the solid (see [[Capillary pressure]]). In a reservoir, zones with larger pores and pore throats have lower capillary pressure, lower irreducible water saturation, and higher hydrocarbon pore volume. | | The [[capillary pressure]] of a reservoir affects the magnitude and distribution of water saturation and thus the hydrocarbon volume in a given reservoir area [[Leverett, 1941]]{{citation needed}}. The capillary pressure is a function of the capillary radius, the interfacial tension, and the contact angle between the water and the solid (see [[Capillary pressure]]). In a reservoir, zones with larger pores and pore throats have lower capillary pressure, lower irreducible water saturation, and higher hydrocarbon pore volume. |
Line 160: |
Line 145: |
| Modern three-dimensional seismic data<ref name=pt06r17>Brown, A. R., 1986 Interpretation of three-dimensional seismic data: [http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=1025 AAPG Memoir 42], 194 p.</ref> can sometimes assist in predicting reservoir quality away from well control. Careful processing of seismic data allows a conversion of the seismic reflection amplitudes to estimates of acoustic impedance. Because lithology, porosity, and fluid saturations affect the acoustic impedance of a rock, a relationship can then be established between the seismic estimates of impedance and the rock properties determined from the logs or in the laboratory. (For information on comparing seismic data to rock properties, see [[Seismic inversion]].) | | Modern three-dimensional seismic data<ref name=pt06r17>Brown, A. R., 1986 Interpretation of three-dimensional seismic data: [http://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=1025 AAPG Memoir 42], 194 p.</ref> can sometimes assist in predicting reservoir quality away from well control. Careful processing of seismic data allows a conversion of the seismic reflection amplitudes to estimates of acoustic impedance. Because lithology, porosity, and fluid saturations affect the acoustic impedance of a rock, a relationship can then be established between the seismic estimates of impedance and the rock properties determined from the logs or in the laboratory. (For information on comparing seismic data to rock properties, see [[Seismic inversion]].) |
| | | |
− | Wireline logs can be classified into three different groups based on the information they provide: (1) lithology indicators—[[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]], sonic, density, and neutron logs, (2) porosity logs—sonic, density, and neutron logs, and (3) fluid saturation logs—resistivity logs.<ref name=pt06r6>Asquith, G., Gibson, C. 1982, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/alt-browse/aapg-special-volumes/me3.htm Basic well log analysis for geologists]: AAPG Methods in Exploration Series 3, 216 p.</ref> (For more on the information that wireline logs can provide, see [[Standard interpretation]].) | + | Wireline logs can be classified into three different groups based on the information they provide: (1) lithology indicators—[[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]], [[Basic open hole tools#Sonic|sonic]], [[Basic open hole tools#Density|density]], and [[Basic open hole tools#Compensated neutron|neutron]] logs, (2) porosity logs—sonic, density, and neutron logs, and (3) fluid saturation logs—resistivity logs.<ref name=pt06r6>Asquith, G., Gibson, C. 1982, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/alt-browse/aapg-special-volumes/me3.htm Basic well log analysis for geologists]: AAPG Methods in Exploration Series 3, 216 p.</ref> (For more on the information that wireline logs can provide, see [[Standard interpretation]].) |
| | | |
| In addition to lithology, porosity, and fluid saturations, permeability sometimes can be inferred from log responses or a combination of log responses. The [[Basic open hole tools#Spontaneous potential|spontaneous potential]] log is most often used as a qualitative indicator of the permeability of a formation. (For more on wireline log response to reservoir properties, see [[Quick-look lithology from logs]].) | | In addition to lithology, porosity, and fluid saturations, permeability sometimes can be inferred from log responses or a combination of log responses. The [[Basic open hole tools#Spontaneous potential|spontaneous potential]] log is most often used as a qualitative indicator of the permeability of a formation. (For more on wireline log response to reservoir properties, see [[Quick-look lithology from logs]].) |
Line 168: |
Line 153: |
| ===Mesoscopic techniques=== | | ===Mesoscopic techniques=== |
| | | |
− | Core analysis measurements performed on representative core samples can more accurately assess reservoir quality<ref name=pt06r64>Keelan, D. K., 1972, A critical review of core analysis techniques: Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, v. 2, p. 42–55.</ref> and heterogeneities. Core analysis porosities are typically determined using one of three techniques: summation of fluids, resaturation, and Boyle's Law. Permeability on core samples is determined using one of two methods: steady-state or unsteady-state. Air (gas) permeability measurements are typically measured using a steady-state technique. The unsteady-state technique monitors pressure changes, flow rates, and fluid changes as a function of time to determine permeability [[Jones, 1982]]{{citation needed}}. The unsteady-state method should be used to determine the air permeability for samples of low permeability to obtain the most accurate values. Liquid permeability measurements can be determined by either the steady-state or the unsteady-state method (see [[Permeability]]). | + | [[Overview of routine core analysis|Core analysis]] measurements performed on representative core samples can more accurately assess reservoir quality<ref name=pt06r64>Keelan, D. K., 1972, A critical review of core analysis techniques: Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, v. 2, p. 42–55.</ref> and heterogeneities. Core analysis porosities are typically determined using one of three techniques: summation of fluids, resaturation, and Boyle's Law. Permeability on core samples is determined using one of two methods: steady-state or unsteady-state. Air (gas) permeability measurements are typically measured using a steady-state technique. The unsteady-state technique monitors pressure changes, flow rates, and fluid changes as a function of time to determine permeability [[Jones, 1982]]{{citation needed}}. The unsteady-state method should be used to determine the air permeability for samples of low permeability to obtain the most accurate values. Liquid permeability measurements can be determined by either the steady-state or the unsteady-state method (see [[Permeability]]). |
| | | |
| Capillary pressure can also be measured in the laboratory on core samples.<ref name=pt06r149>Wardlaw, N. C., 1976, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1974-76/data/pg/0060/0002/0200/0245.htm Pore geometry of carbonate rocks as revealed by pore casts and capillary pressure]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 60, p. 245–257.</ref> Various techniques are used to determine fluid saturations in the sample at various pressures so that a saturation profile at different pressures is created, which characterizes the irreducible water saturation and hydrocarbon pore volume of the rock. | | Capillary pressure can also be measured in the laboratory on core samples.<ref name=pt06r149>Wardlaw, N. C., 1976, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1974-76/data/pg/0060/0002/0200/0245.htm Pore geometry of carbonate rocks as revealed by pore casts and capillary pressure]: AAPG Bulletin, v. 60, p. 245–257.</ref> Various techniques are used to determine fluid saturations in the sample at various pressures so that a saturation profile at different pressures is created, which characterizes the irreducible water saturation and hydrocarbon pore volume of the rock. |
Line 174: |
Line 159: |
| ===Microscopic techniques=== | | ===Microscopic techniques=== |
| | | |
− | [[file:reservoir-quality_fig1.png|thumb|{{figure number|1}}Binary petrographic image of sandstone. Dark areas are pores and light areas are grains or cement.]] | + | [[file:reservoir-quality_fig1.png|300px|thumb|{{figure number|1}}Binary petrographic image of sandstone. Dark areas are pores and light areas are grains or cement.]] |
| | | |
| Microscopic techniques used to assess reservoir quality include [[thin section analysis]], petrographic image analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction (see [[SEM, XRD, CL, and XF methods]]). Through thin section analysis, the pore types and distribution, the extent of reservoir enhancement or degradation by diagenesis, and the influence of depositional textures on reservoir quality can be determined (see [[Thin section analysis]]). | | Microscopic techniques used to assess reservoir quality include [[thin section analysis]], petrographic image analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction (see [[SEM, XRD, CL, and XF methods]]). Through thin section analysis, the pore types and distribution, the extent of reservoir enhancement or degradation by diagenesis, and the influence of depositional textures on reservoir quality can be determined (see [[Thin section analysis]]). |
Line 185: |
Line 170: |
| * [[Introduction to geological methods]] | | * [[Introduction to geological methods]] |
| * [[Lithofacies and environmental analysis of clastic depositional systems]] | | * [[Lithofacies and environmental analysis of clastic depositional systems]] |
− | * [[Monte Carlo and stochastic simulation methods]]
| |
− | * [[Subsurface maps]]
| |
| * [[Flow units for reservoir characterization]] | | * [[Flow units for reservoir characterization]] |
− | * [[Effective pay determination]]
| |
− | * [[Multivariate data analysis]]
| |
| * [[Geological cross sections]] | | * [[Geological cross sections]] |
| * [[Evaluating structurally complex reservoirs]] | | * [[Evaluating structurally complex reservoirs]] |
| * [[Conversion of well log data to subsurface stratigraphic and structural information]] | | * [[Conversion of well log data to subsurface stratigraphic and structural information]] |
| * [[Evaluating tight gas reservoirs]] | | * [[Evaluating tight gas reservoirs]] |
− | * [[Correlation and regression analysis]]
| |
| * [[Carbonate reservoir models: facies, diagenesis, and flow characterization]] | | * [[Carbonate reservoir models: facies, diagenesis, and flow characterization]] |
| * [[Fluid contacts]] | | * [[Fluid contacts]] |
Line 201: |
Line 181: |
| * [[Evaluating stratigraphically complex fields]] | | * [[Evaluating stratigraphically complex fields]] |
| * [[Evaluating diagenetically complex reservoirs]] | | * [[Evaluating diagenetically complex reservoirs]] |
− | * [[Statistics overview]]
| |
| | | |
| ==References== | | ==References== |
Line 212: |
Line 191: |
| | | |
| [[Category:Geological methods]] | | [[Category:Geological methods]] |
| + | [[Category:Methods in Exploration 10]] |