Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
368 bytes added ,  13:52, 5 April 2022
m
Line 6: Line 6:  
  | part    = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
 
  | part    = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
 
  | chapter = Predicting reservoir system quality and performance
 
  | chapter = Predicting reservoir system quality and performance
  | frompg  = 9-1
+
  | frompg  = 9-46
  | topg    = 9-156
+
  | topg    = 9-47
 
  | author  = Dan J. Hartmann, Edward A. Beaumont
 
  | author  = Dan J. Hartmann, Edward A. Beaumont
 
  | link    = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch09/ch09.htm
 
  | link    = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch09/ch09.htm
Line 16: Line 16:  
==What is the Archie equation?==
 
==What is the Archie equation?==
   −
Archie<ref name=ch09r2>Archie, G., E., 1952, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1949-52/data/pg/0036/0002/0250/0278.htm Classification of carbonate reservoir rocks and petrophysical considerations]: AAPG Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 2, p. 218–298. ''A classic paper written way before its time.''</ref> developed his famous equation to calculate, from well log parameters, the [[water saturation]] (S<sub>w</sub>) of the uninvaded zone in a formation next to a borehole. The Archie equation can be expressed as follows:
+
Archie<ref name=ch09r2>Archie, G. E., 1952, [http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1949-52/data/pg/0036/0002/0250/0278.htm Classification of carbonate reservoir rocks and petrophysical considerations]: AAPG Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 2, p. 218–298. ''A classic paper written way before its time.''</ref> developed his famous equation to calculate, from well log parameters, the [[water saturation]] (S<sub>w</sub>) of the uninvaded zone in a formation next to a borehole. The Archie equation can be expressed as follows:
    
:<math>\mbox{S}_{\rm w}{}^{\rm n} = \frac{\mbox{R}_{\rm w}}{(\Phi^{\rm m} \times \mbox{R}_{\rm t})}</math>
 
:<math>\mbox{S}_{\rm w}{}^{\rm n} = \frac{\mbox{R}_{\rm w}}{(\Phi^{\rm m} \times \mbox{R}_{\rm t})}</math>
Line 44: Line 44:  
{| class = "wikitable"
 
{| class = "wikitable"
 
|-
 
|-
! Step
+
! Step || Find || Use… || If… || Then…
! Find
  −
! Use…
  −
! If…
  −
! Then…
   
|-
 
|-
| 1
+
| 1 || n
| n
   
|
 
|
 
*  2.0 for Archie porosity
 
*  2.0 for Archie porosity
*  1.8 (or less) for rocks with clayey matrix or fractures
+
*  1.8 (or less) for rocks with clayey matrix or [[fracture]]s
*  4.0 for very strongly oil-wet rocks
+
*  4.0 for very strongly [http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Terms/o/oil_wet.aspx oil-wet] rocks
   −
| Not sure of rock type
+
| Not sure of rock type || Use 2.0
| Use 2.0
   
|-
 
|-
| 2
+
| 2 || R<sub>w</sub>
| R<sub>w</sub>
   
|
 
|
*  Value calculated from SP log  
+
*  Value calculated from [[Basic_open_hole_tools#Spontaneous_potential|spontaneous potential]] (SP) log  
 
*  Estimated from R<sub>w</sub> catalogs  
 
*  Estimated from R<sub>w</sub> catalogs  
 
*  Estimated from wet zone R<sub>o</sub> value  
 
*  Estimated from wet zone R<sub>o</sub> value  
 
*  Measured from water sample
 
*  Measured from water sample
| Thin beds, hydrocarbons in zone, or fresh formation waters make SP calculations uncertain
+
| Thin beds, hydrocarbons in zone, or fresh formation waters make SP calculations uncertain || Use [[thin-bed correction]] or another method
| Use thin-bed correction or another method
   
|-
 
|-
| 3
+
| 3 || Φ || Value derived from cores, density, density–neutron, or sonic logs (See [[Basic open hole tools]].) || Density–neutron log matrix setting does not match formation matrix || Use density– neutron crossplot (See [[Determining porosity from density-neutron logs]].)
| Φ
  −
| Value derived from cores, density, density–neutron, or sonic logs
  −
| Density–neutron log matrix setting does not match formation matrix
  −
| Use density– neutron crossplot
   
|-
 
|-
| 4
+
| 4 || m
| m
   
|
 
|
 
*  2.0 for Archie porosity  
 
*  2.0 for Archie porosity  
 
*  1.7–2.0 for shaly sandstones  
 
*  1.7–2.0 for shaly sandstones  
*  2.0–2.5 for porosity with connected vugs  
+
*  2.0–2.5 for porosity with connected [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vug vugs]
*  2.5–3.0 for nonconnected moldic porosity  
+
*  2.5–3.0 for nonconnected [[Porosity#Carbonate_pore_systems|moldic porosity]]
 
*  ~1.0 for fractured rocks
 
*  ~1.0 for fractured rocks
| Not sure of rock type or pore geometry
+
| Not sure of rock type or pore geometry || Use 2.0
| Use 2.0
   
|-
 
|-
| 5
+
| 5 || R<sub>t</sub> || Value derived from deep resistivity log such as RILD or RLLD || Beds are thin, invasion occurred or borehole has washouts || Use chartbook corrections
| R<sub>t</sub>
  −
| Value derived from deep resistivity log such as RILD or RLLD
  −
| Beds are thin, invasion occurred or borehole has washouts
  −
| Use chartbook corrections
   
|}
 
|}
   Line 111: Line 93:  
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]]  
 
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]]  
 
[[Category:Predicting reservoir system quality and performance]]
 
[[Category:Predicting reservoir system quality and performance]]
 +
[[Category:Treatise Handbook 3]]

Navigation menu