Difference between revisions of "Taxes"

From AAPG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
{| class = "wikitable"
 
{| class = "wikitable"
 
|-
 
|-
|+ {{table number|1}}Federal income tax schedules and rules
+
|+ {{table number|1}}Federal income tax schedules and rules{{update after}}
 
|-
 
|-
! Taxable Income
+
! Taxable Income || Rate (%)
! Rate (%)
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Not over [[cost::50,000 USD]]
+
| Not over [[cost::50,000 USD]] || 15
| 15
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Over [[cost::50,000 USD]], less than [[cost::75,000 USD]]
+
| Over [[cost::50,000 USD]], less than [[cost::75,000 USD]] || 25
| 25
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Over [[cost::75,000 USD]], less than [[cost::100,000 USD]]
+
| Over [[cost::75,000 USD]], less than [[cost::100,000 USD]] || 34
| 34
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Over [[cost::100,000 USD]], less than [[cost::335,000 USD]]
+
| Over [[cost::100,000 USD]], less than [[cost::335,000 USD]] || 39
| 39
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Over [[cost::335,000 USD]]
+
| Over [[cost::335,000 USD]] || 34
| 34
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
In federal income taxation, the fundamental concept being applied is the tax free return of invested capital. Congress legislates the definition of ''profit'' and thus when the investor will receive the tax free return of his investment. Expenditures in which the tax payer receives immediate tax free return are called ''expensed'', whereas expenditures in which the tax payer spreads the tax free return of his investment over several years are said to be ''capitalized''. The timing of the tax deduction for the capitalized expenditures are determined by a set of rules for depreciation, depletion, and amortization.
 
In federal income taxation, the fundamental concept being applied is the tax free return of invested capital. Congress legislates the definition of ''profit'' and thus when the investor will receive the tax free return of his investment. Expenditures in which the tax payer receives immediate tax free return are called ''expensed'', whereas expenditures in which the tax payer spreads the tax free return of his investment over several years are said to be ''capitalized''. The timing of the tax deduction for the capitalized expenditures are determined by a set of rules for depreciation, depletion, and amortization.
  
Oil and gas taxation is one of the most difficult areas of taxation. We attempt here to provide only a foundation of knowledge by presenting basic oil and gas terminology as it applies to taxation and a detailed tax model<ref name=pt02r16>Thompson, R. S., Wright, J. D., 1985, Oil property evaluation, 2nd ed.: Golden, CO, Thompson-Wright Associates, 212 p.</ref>, <ref name=pt02r17>Thompson, R. S., Wright, J. D., 1992, Oil and gas property evaluation, 3rd ed.: Golden, CO, Thompson-Wright Associates, in prep.</ref>.
+
Oil and gas taxation is one of the most difficult areas of taxation. We attempt here to provide only a foundation of knowledge by presenting basic oil and gas terminology as it applies to taxation and a detailed tax model.<ref name=pt02r16>Thompson, R. S., Wright, J. D., 1985, Oil property evaluation, 2nd ed.: Golden, CO, Thompson-Wright Associates, 212 p.</ref> <ref name=pt02r17>Thompson, R. S., Wright, J. D., 1992, Oil and gas property evaluation, 3rd ed.: Golden, CO, Thompson-Wright Associates, in prep.</ref>
  
 
==Oil and gas taxation terminology==
 
==Oil and gas taxation terminology==
Line 48: Line 42:
 
===Leasehold costs===
 
===Leasehold costs===
  
''Leasehold costs'' are expenditures associated with the acquisition of an economic interest in a natural resource that are deemed to benefit future tax periods. Accordingly, leasehold costs are capitalized, and the tax free return of that expenditure are recovered through the ''allowable depletion calculation''. The depletion deduction was created by Congress to give a means of returning the invested capital to the investor tax free as the resource is depleted. There are two methods of calculating depletion: cost depletion and percentage depletion. (See the chapter on “Determining Owners of Oil and Gas Interests, and Methods of Conveyance” in Part 1 for more information on lease ownership costs and revenue.)
+
''Leasehold costs'' are expenditures associated with the acquisition of an economic interest in a natural resource that are deemed to benefit future tax periods. Accordingly, leasehold costs are capitalized, and the tax free return of that expenditure are recovered through the ''allowable depletion calculation''. The depletion deduction was created by Congress to give a means of returning the invested capital to the investor tax free as the resource is depleted. There are two methods of calculating depletion: cost depletion and percentage depletion. (See “[[Determining owners of oil and gas interests]]" and "[[Methods of conveyance]]” for more information on lease ownership costs and revenue.)
  
 
===Lease bonus===
 
===Lease bonus===
  
The payment made by the lessee to the lessor for the right to explore for oil and gas and develop the property is called a ''lease bonus''. The lease bonus payment made by the lessee is capitalized by the lessee and recovered through the allowable depletion calculation. (See the chapter on “Nature of the Oil and Gas Lease” in Part 1 for more on leases.)
+
The payment made by the lessee to the lessor for the right to explore for oil and gas and develop the property is called a ''lease bonus''. The lease bonus payment made by the lessee is capitalized by the lessee and recovered through the allowable depletion calculation. (See “[[Nature of the oil and gas lease]]” for more on leases.)
  
 
===Geological and geophysical (G & G) costs===
 
===Geological and geophysical (G & G) costs===
Line 72: Line 66:
 
==Current tax treatment==
 
==Current tax treatment==
  
The last significant overhaul of oil and gas taxation is the result of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. An analysis and comparison of the tax rules prior to and after the 1986 Tax Reform Act are presented by Thompson<ref name=pt02r15>Thompson, R. S., 1987, Impact of the new tax law on internal cash flow generation: Dallas, TX, 1987 SPE Hydrocarbon and Economics Symposium, SPE Paper 16309, p. 161–172.</ref>. Table 1 summarizes the current tax treatment for the integrated producer (typically, the major oil companies) and the independent producer and royalty owner (IPRO). The tax definitions for an IPRO and an integrated producer are presented in Ernst and Young's<ref name=pt02r7>ErnstYoung1990, Oil and gas federal income taxation, p. 158–163.</ref> ''Oil and Gas Federal'' ''Income Taxation''. As you can see from Table 1, the IPRO receives preferential tax treatment.
+
The last significant overhaul of oil and gas taxation is the result of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. An analysis and comparison of the tax rules prior to and after the 1986 Tax Reform Act are presented by Thompson.<ref name=pt02r15>Thompson, R. S., 1987, Impact of the new tax law on internal cash flow generation: Dallas, TX, 1987 SPE Hydrocarbon and Economics Symposium, SPE Paper 16309, p. 161–172.</ref> Table 1 summarizes the current tax treatment for the integrated producer (typically, the major oil companies) and the independent producer and royalty owner (IPRO). The tax definitions for an IPRO and an integrated producer are presented in Ernst and Young's<ref name=pt02r7>ErnstYoung1990, Oil and gas federal income taxation, p. 158–163.</ref> ''Oil and Gas Federal'' ''Income Taxation''. As you can see from Table 1, the IPRO receives preferential tax treatment.
  
 
==Calculating after-tax net cash flow==
 
==Calculating after-tax net cash flow==
  
The recommended approach to calculate after-tax net cash flow (NCF) is to use Equation 1 in the previous chapter on “Building a Cash Flow Model,which is
+
The recommended approach to calculate after-tax net cash flow (NCF) is to use Equation 1, which is
  
 
:<math> \mbox{After-tax NCF} = (\mbox{Net revenue interest} \times \mbox{Production} \times \mbox{Wellhead price}) - \mbox{Wellhead taxes} - \mbox{Operating costs} - \mbox{Federal income taxes} - \mbox{Investments}</math>
 
:<math> \mbox{After-tax NCF} = (\mbox{Net revenue interest} \times \mbox{Production} \times \mbox{Wellhead price}) - \mbox{Wellhead taxes} - \mbox{Operating costs} - \mbox{Federal income taxes} - \mbox{Investments}</math>
  
All transactions in the equation are cash items, one of which is cash income taxes. The separation of the tax calculation from the NCF calculation is recommended because of the many complications in oil and gas taxation. Instead of combining the NCF calculation and the tax calculation, the federal income tax model for oil and gas transactions (Figure 1) should be used to calculate the yearly taxes for the property, taking into consideration the appropriate tax treatment of each of the transactions. Once a cash tax liability (negative tax = tax savings) is calculated, this tax amount is subtracted, as shown in Equation 1.
+
[[file:about-taxes_fig1.png|thumb|300px|{{figure number|1}}Federal income tax model for oil and gas transactions. Amounts are net to your working and revenue interest. Calculations are made each tax year.<ref name=pt02r16 />]]
  
[[file:about-taxes_fig1.png|thumb|{{figure number|1}}Federal income tax model for oil and gas transactions. Amounts are net to your working and revenue interest. Calculations are made each tax year. (After <ref name=pt02r16 />.)]]
+
All transactions in the equation are cash items, one of which is cash income taxes. The separation of the tax calculation from the NCF calculation is recommended because of the many complications in oil and gas taxation. Instead of combining the NCF calculation and the tax calculation, the federal income tax model for oil and gas transactions ([[:file:about-taxes_fig1.png|Figure 1]]) should be used to calculate the yearly taxes for the property, taking into consideration the appropriate tax treatment of each of the transactions. Once a cash tax liability (negative tax = tax savings) is calculated, this tax amount is subtracted, as shown in Equation 1.
  
It sounds simple and it actually is, once some experience is gained. Two worksheets are provided to help keep the numbers straight<ref name=pt02r17 />. Tables 2 and 3 are the completed worksheets for the example development well in which the producer is an independent producer and royalty owner eligible for percentage depletion. Table 4 is the federal income tax calculations for the example multiwell extension project.
+
It sounds simple and it actually is, once some experience is gained. Two worksheets are provided to help keep the numbers straight.<ref name=pt02r17 /> Tables 2 and 3 are the completed worksheets for the example development well in which the producer is an independent producer and royalty owner eligible for percentage depletion. Table 4 is the federal income tax calculations for the example multiwell extension project.
  
 
{| class = "wikitable"
 
{| class = "wikitable"
Line 90: Line 84:
 
|+ {{table number|2}}Income tax calculations for example development well. All amounts $M.
 
|+ {{table number|2}}Income tax calculations for example development well. All amounts $M.
 
|-
 
|-
! Year
+
! Year || 1991 || 1992 || 1993 || 1994 || 1995 || 1996 || 1997 || 1998
! 1991
 
! 1992
 
! 1993
 
! 1994
 
! 1995
 
! 1996
 
! 1997
 
! 1998
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Gross Inc. (Gl)
+
| Gross Inc. (Gl) || 1576.075 || 864.968 || 474.705 || 260.523 || 142.978 || 78.468 || 43.064 || 2.752
| 1576.075
 
| 864.968
 
| 474.705
 
| 260.523
 
| 142.978
 
| 78.468
 
| 43.064
 
| 2.752
 
 
|-
 
|-
|     – Operating Costs
+
|     – Operating Costs || 24.000 || 24.000 || 24.000 || 24.000 || 24.000 || 24.000 || 24.000 || 2.158
| 24.000
 
| 24.000
 
| 24.000
 
| 24.000
 
| 24.000
 
| 24.000
 
| 24.000
 
| 2.158
 
 
|-
 
|-
|     – Sev.Adv.Tax
+
|     – Sev.Adv.Tax || 126.086 || 69.197 || 37.976 || 20.842 || 11.438 || 6.277 || 3.445 || 0.220
| 126.086
 
| 69.197
 
| 37.976
 
| 20.842
 
| 11.438
 
| 6.277
 
| 3.445
 
| 0.220
 
 
|-
 
|-
|     – IDC Expense
+
|     – IDC Expense || 950.000 || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000
| 950.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
 
|-
 
|-
|     – IDC Amortization
+
|     – IDC Amortization || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000 || 0.000
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
 
|-
 
|-
|     – Depreciation
+
|     – Depreciation || 42.840 || 73.470 || 52.470 || 37.470 || 26.790 || 26.790 || 26.790 || 13.380
| 42.840
 
| 73.470
 
| 52.470
 
| 37.470
 
| 26.790
 
| 26.790
 
| 26.790
 
| 13.380
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Taxable Income Before Depletion
+
| Taxable Income Before Depletion || 433.149 || 698.301 || 360.258 || 178.212 || 80.750 || 21.401 || –11.171 || –13.007
| 433.149
 
| 698.301
 
| 360.258
 
| 178.212
 
| 80.750
 
| 21.401
 
| –11.171
 
| –13.007
 
 
|-
 
|-
|     – Depl. Allowance
+
|     – Dept. Allowance || 236.411 || 129.745 || 71.206 || 39.079 || 21.447 || 11.770 || 0.000 || 0.000
| 236.411
 
| 129.745
 
| 71.206
 
| 39.079
 
| 21.447
 
| 11.770
 
| 0.000
 
| 0.000
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Taxable Income
+
| Taxable Income || 196.738 || 568.556 || 289.053 || 139.133 || 59.303 || 9.630 || –11.171 || –13.007
| 196.738
 
| 568.556
 
| 289.053
 
| 139.133
 
| 59.303
 
| 9.630
 
| –11.171
 
| –13.007
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Cash Tax Before Credits and Minimum Tax
+
| Cash Tax Before Credits and Minimum Tax || 66.891 || 193.309 || 98.278 || 47.305 || 20.163 || 3.274 || –3.798 || –4.422
| 66.891
 
| 193.309
 
| 98.278
 
| 47.305
 
| 20.163
 
| 3.274
 
| –3.798
 
| –4.422
 
 
|-
 
|-
|     – Tax Credit
+
|     – Tax Credit || || || || || || || ||
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
|     + Minimum Tax
+
|     + Minimum Tax || || || || || || || ||
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
| ''' Final Cash Tax '''
+
| ''' Final Cash Tax ''' || ''' 66.891 ''' || ''' 193.309 ''' || ''' 98.278 ''' || ''' 47.305 ''' || ''' 20.163 ''' || ''' 3.274 ''' || ''' –3.798 ''' || ''' –4.422 '''
| ''' 66.891 '''
 
| ''' 193.309 '''
 
| ''' 98.278 '''
 
| ''' 47.305 '''
 
| ''' 20.163 '''
 
| ''' 3.274 '''
 
| ''' –3.798 '''
 
| ''' –4.422 '''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 251: Line 117:
 
|+ {{table number|3}}Depreciation, depletion, and amortization calculations for example development well
 
|+ {{table number|3}}Depreciation, depletion, and amortization calculations for example development well
 
|-
 
|-
! Year
+
! Year || 1991 || 1992 || 1993 || 1994 || 1995 || 1996 || 1997 || 1998
! 1991
 
! 1992
 
! 1993
 
! 1994
 
! 1995
 
! 1996
 
! 1997
 
! 1998
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan=9 | AMORTIZATION
 
| colspan=9 | AMORTIZATION
 
|-
 
|-
| Capitalized IDCs, $M
+
| Capitalized IDCs, $M || 0.000 || || || || || || ||
| 0.000
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Amortization rate
+
| Amortization rate || 0.20 || 0.20 || 0.20 || 0.20 || 0.20 || || ||
| 0.20
 
| 0.20
 
| 0.20
 
| 0.20
 
| 0.20
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
| ''' IDC Amortization, $M '''
+
| ''' IDC Amortization, $M ''' || ''' 0.000 ''' || ''' 0.000 ''' || ''' 0.000 ''' || ''' 0.000 ''' || ''' 0.000 ''' || || ||
| ''' 0.000 '''
 
| ''' 0.000 '''
 
| ''' 0.000 '''
 
| ''' 0.000 '''
 
| ''' 0.000 '''
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan=9 | DEPRECIATION
 
| colspan=9 | DEPRECIATION
 
|-
 
|-
| Depr. basis (tangibles), $M
+
| Depr. basis (tangibles), $M || 300.000 || || || || || || ||
| 300.000
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
| 7-year MACRS rates
+
| 7-year MACRS rates || 0.1428 || 0.2449 || 0.1749 || 0.1249 || 0.0893 || 0.0893 || 0.0893 || 0.044
| 0.1428
 
| 0.2449
 
| 0.1749
 
| 0.1249
 
| 0.0893
 
| 0.0893
 
| 0.0893
 
| 0.044
 
 
|-
 
|-
| ''' Depreciation Expense, $M '''
+
| ''' Depreciation Expense, $M ''' || ''' 42.840 ''' || ''' 73.470 ''' || ''' 52.470 ''' || ''' 37.470 ''' || ''' 26.790 ''' || ''' 26.790 ''' || ''' 26.790 ''' || ''' 13.380 '''
| ''' 42.840 '''
 
| ''' 73.470 '''
 
| ''' 52.470 '''
 
| ''' 37.470 '''
 
| ''' 26.790 '''
 
| ''' 26.790 '''
 
| ''' 26.790 '''
 
| ''' 13.380 '''
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan=9 | DEPLETION
 
| colspan=9 | DEPLETION
Line 679: Line 469:
  
 
The case for an integrated producer is an easier case since the producer can only take cost depletion.
 
The case for an integrated producer is an easier case since the producer can only take cost depletion.
 +
 +
[[file:about-taxes_fig2.png|thumb|300px|{{figure number|2}}Depletion allowance calculation. Note that remaining reserves (U) are end of year. In cost depletion calculation, S = sales during year. (After <ref name=pt02r16 />.)]]
  
 
==Calculating allowable depletion==
 
==Calculating allowable depletion==
  
Determining the allowable depletion deduction is probably the most difficult calculation. Figure 2 is intended to help with this calculation. As shown in Figure 2, allowable depletion is the greater of cost depletion or percentage depletion. ''Cost depletion'' is calculated by taking the remaining depletable basis (unrecovered G & G costs and lease bonus) and multiplying by the fraction of the remaining reserves produced during the year (production during the year divided by reserves at the beginning of the year). All producers are eligible for cost depletion. Independent producers and royalty owners are also eligible for percentage depletion. ''Percentage depletion'' is the lesser of 15% of gross income or 100% of taxable income before depletion from the property. Prior to January 1, 1991, the Taxable Income limitation was 50% for each property. This change is the result of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990. This recent change also demonstrates the “dynamics” of tax rules and the importance of seeking professional advice in this area. An example of another complication in the tax law is the 65% of taxable income limitation from all sources (not just limited to the producing property). The 65% taxable income limit from all sources is difficult to apply to single project economics and is ignored in the example problems presented.
+
Determining the allowable depletion deduction is probably the most difficult calculation. [[:file:about-taxes_fig2.png|Figure 2]] is intended to help with this calculation. As shown in Figure 2, allowable depletion is the greater of cost depletion or percentage depletion. ''Cost depletion'' is calculated by taking the remaining depletable basis (unrecovered G & G costs and lease bonus) and multiplying by the fraction of the remaining reserves produced during the year (production during the year divided by reserves at the beginning of the year). All producers are eligible for cost depletion. Independent producers and royalty owners are also eligible for percentage depletion. ''Percentage depletion'' is the lesser of 15% of gross income or 100% of taxable income before depletion from the property. Prior to January 1, 1991, the Taxable Income limitation was 50% for each property. This change is the result of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990. This recent change also demonstrates the “dynamics” of tax rules and the importance of seeking professional advice in this area. An example of another complication in the tax law is the 65% of taxable income limitation from all sources (not just limited to the producing property). The 65% taxable income limit from all sources is difficult to apply to single project [[economics]] and is ignored in the example problems presented.
 
 
[[file:about-taxes_fig2.png|thumb|{{figure number|2}}Depletion allowance calculation. Note that remaining reserves (U) are end of year. In cost depletion calculation, S = sales during year. (After <ref name=pt02r16 />.)]]
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 695: Line 485:
  
 
[[Category:Economics and risk assessment]]
 
[[Category:Economics and risk assessment]]
 +
[[Category:Methods in Exploration 10]]

Latest revision as of 15:01, 24 January 2022

Development Geology Reference Manual
Series Methods in Exploration
Part Economics and risk asseement
Chapter About taxes
Author Robert S. Thompson
Link Web page
Store AAPG Store

Oil and gas taxes are of two general types: wellhead or production taxes, which are paid when the oil and gas are produced regardless of the amount of profit (or loss), and income taxes, which are paid on the amount of profit (called taxable income) defined by the IRS. Wellhead taxes in most states average about 5 to 10% of the revenue, and the current corporate income tax rate varies from 15% to 39% (see Table 1). Wellhead taxes include excise, ad valorem, and severance taxes.

Table 1 Federal income tax schedules and rules[dated info]
Taxable Income Rate (%)
Not over cost::50,000 USD 15
Over cost::50,000 USD, less than cost::75,000 USD 25
Over cost::75,000 USD, less than cost::100,000 USD 34
Over cost::100,000 USD, less than cost::335,000 USD 39
Over cost::335,000 USD 34

In federal income taxation, the fundamental concept being applied is the tax free return of invested capital. Congress legislates the definition of profit and thus when the investor will receive the tax free return of his investment. Expenditures in which the tax payer receives immediate tax free return are called expensed, whereas expenditures in which the tax payer spreads the tax free return of his investment over several years are said to be capitalized. The timing of the tax deduction for the capitalized expenditures are determined by a set of rules for depreciation, depletion, and amortization.

Oil and gas taxation is one of the most difficult areas of taxation. We attempt here to provide only a foundation of knowledge by presenting basic oil and gas terminology as it applies to taxation and a detailed tax model.[1] [2]

Oil and gas taxation terminology[edit]

Several important terms are used in oil and gas taxation practices of which the reader should be aware.

Leasehold costs[edit]

Leasehold costs are expenditures associated with the acquisition of an economic interest in a natural resource that are deemed to benefit future tax periods. Accordingly, leasehold costs are capitalized, and the tax free return of that expenditure are recovered through the allowable depletion calculation. The depletion deduction was created by Congress to give a means of returning the invested capital to the investor tax free as the resource is depleted. There are two methods of calculating depletion: cost depletion and percentage depletion. (See “Determining owners of oil and gas interests" and "Methods of conveyance” for more information on lease ownership costs and revenue.)

Lease bonus[edit]

The payment made by the lessee to the lessor for the right to explore for oil and gas and develop the property is called a lease bonus. The lease bonus payment made by the lessee is capitalized by the lessee and recovered through the allowable depletion calculation. (See “Nature of the oil and gas lease” for more on leases.)

Geological and geophysical (G & G) costs[edit]

Geological and geophysical (G & G) costs are expenditures for geological studies and geophysical work such as seismic surveys. If the expenditures result in the acquisition and retention of a property, the expenditures are capitalized and the tax free return of the investment is determined from the allowable depletion calculation. If the G & G costs do not lead to the acquisition or retention of a property, then these costs can be expensed in the taxable year the property is relinquished.

Lease and well equipment[edit]

Lease and well equipment includes such items as the wellhead, flow lines, separators, and other equipment necessary to operate the property as well as the labor to install the equipment. Expenditures for tangible items such as these are capitalized, and the tax free return of the expenditure is recovered through depreciation calculations. Other examples of tangible items include surface and production casing, even though the casing is cemented in the well and has no apparent salvage value. Upon abandonment, any undepreciated amount would be written off. The depreciation rules are always changing. As a result of the 1986 Tax Reform Act, the depreciation system is called the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MARCS) (see Table 1).

Intangible drilling and development costs (IDCs)[edit]

Special tax treatment for expenditures classified as intangible drilling and development costs, or IDCs, is available to the tax payer. U.S. Treasury Regulation 1.612-4 states that “all expenditures made by an operator for wages, fuel, repairs, hauling,…, incident to and necessary for the drilling of wells and the preparation of the well for the production of oil and gas” are IDCs. A well is considered to be prepared for production when the wellhead is installed. Table 1 shows the current tax treatment of IDCs. Again, tangible items such as surface casing and production casing are classified as tangible expenditures, and the tax free return of the expenditure is recovered through depreciation.

Lease operating expenses[edit]

Lease operating expenses are expenditures incurred in the day-to-day activities of the production operations. Basically, costs incurred during the current tax period that were spent in an effort to generate revenues during the current tax period are treated as current period expenses. Direct labor, power costs, and maintenance costs are some examples.

Current tax treatment[edit]

The last significant overhaul of oil and gas taxation is the result of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. An analysis and comparison of the tax rules prior to and after the 1986 Tax Reform Act are presented by Thompson.[3] Table 1 summarizes the current tax treatment for the integrated producer (typically, the major oil companies) and the independent producer and royalty owner (IPRO). The tax definitions for an IPRO and an integrated producer are presented in Ernst and Young's[4] Oil and Gas Federal Income Taxation. As you can see from Table 1, the IPRO receives preferential tax treatment.

Calculating after-tax net cash flow[edit]

The recommended approach to calculate after-tax net cash flow (NCF) is to use Equation 1, which is

Figure 1 Federal income tax model for oil and gas transactions. Amounts are net to your working and revenue interest. Calculations are made each tax year.[1]

All transactions in the equation are cash items, one of which is cash income taxes. The separation of the tax calculation from the NCF calculation is recommended because of the many complications in oil and gas taxation. Instead of combining the NCF calculation and the tax calculation, the federal income tax model for oil and gas transactions (Figure 1) should be used to calculate the yearly taxes for the property, taking into consideration the appropriate tax treatment of each of the transactions. Once a cash tax liability (negative tax = tax savings) is calculated, this tax amount is subtracted, as shown in Equation 1.

It sounds simple and it actually is, once some experience is gained. Two worksheets are provided to help keep the numbers straight.[2] Tables 2 and 3 are the completed worksheets for the example development well in which the producer is an independent producer and royalty owner eligible for percentage depletion. Table 4 is the federal income tax calculations for the example multiwell extension project.

Table 2 Income tax calculations for example development well. All amounts $M.
Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Gross Inc. (Gl) 1576.075 864.968 474.705 260.523 142.978 78.468 43.064 2.752
    – Operating Costs 24.000 24.000 24.000 24.000 24.000 24.000 24.000 2.158
    – Sev.Adv.Tax 126.086 69.197 37.976 20.842 11.438 6.277 3.445 0.220
    – IDC Expense 950.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
    – IDC Amortization 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
    – Depreciation 42.840 73.470 52.470 37.470 26.790 26.790 26.790 13.380
Taxable Income Before Depletion 433.149 698.301 360.258 178.212 80.750 21.401 –11.171 –13.007
    – Dept. Allowance 236.411 129.745 71.206 39.079 21.447 11.770 0.000 0.000
Taxable Income 196.738 568.556 289.053 139.133 59.303 9.630 –11.171 –13.007
Cash Tax Before Credits and Minimum Tax 66.891 193.309 98.278 47.305 20.163 3.274 –3.798 –4.422
    – Tax Credit
    + Minimum Tax
Final Cash Tax 66.891 193.309 98.278 47.305 20.163 3.274 –3.798 –4.422
Table 3 Depreciation, depletion, and amortization calculations for example development well
Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
AMORTIZATION
Capitalized IDCs, $M 0.000
Amortization rate 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
IDC Amortization, $M 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DEPRECIATION
Depr. basis (tangibles), $M 300.000
7-year MACRS rates 0.1428 0.2449 0.1749 0.1249 0.0893 0.0893 0.0893 0.044
Depreciation Expense, $M 42.840 73.470 52.470 37.470 26.790 26.790 26.790 13.380
DEPLETION
Depletion basis, $M 125.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Cost depletion, $M 57.211 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
  15 % Gl 236.411 129.745 71.206 39.079 21.447 11.770 6.460 0.413
  100 % TIBD 433.149 698.301 360.258 178.212 80.750 21.401 –11.171 –13.007
Percentage depletion, $M
  Lessor of 15% Gl or 100%
  TIBD 236.411 129.745 71.206 39.079 21.447 11.770 –11.171 –13.007
Allowable Depletion, $M
   Greater Cost or % 236.411 129.745 71.206 39.079 21.447 11.770 0.000 0.000
Gross oil production (MBO) 96.066 52.722 28.934 15.880 8.715 4.783 2.625 0.168
Oil res. beg. of period 209.892 113.826 61.104 32.170 16.290 7.575 2.793 0.168
Table 4 Federal income tax calculations for example multiwell extension project
Year Gross Income ($M) Operat. Costs ($M) SEV&ADV Tax ($M) IDCs DHCs ($M) DEPR TIBD ($M) Cost Depletion ($M) Percent Depletion ($M) Allowable Depletion ($M) Taxable Income ($M) Tax Credits ($M) Cash Taxes ($M)
1991 1576.075 24.000 126.086 3400.000 128.520 –2102.531 37.187 –2102.531 37.187 –2139.718 0.000 –727.504
1992 2441.043 48.000 195.283 950.000 263.250 984.510 77.608 366.156 366.156 618.353 0.000 210.240
1993 2915.748 72.000 233.260 950.000 273.720 1386.768 6.472 437.362 437.362 949.406 0.000 322.798
1994 3176.271 96.000 254.102 0.000 238.350 2587.820 0.000 476.441 476.441 2111.379 0.000 717.869
1995 1743.175 96.000 139.454 0.000 170.310 1337.411 0.000 261.476 261.476 1075.935 0.000 365.818
1996 956.675 96.000 76.534 0.000 144.630 639.511 0.000 143.501 143.501 496.009 0.000 168.643
1997 525.034 96.000 42.003 0.000 133.950 253.081 0.000 78.755 78.755 174.326 0.000 59.271
1998 267.262 74.158 21.381 0.000 93.720 78.003 0.000 40.089 40.089 37.914 0.000 12.891
1999 124.284 50.158 9.943 0.000 40.170 24.013 0.000 18.643 18.643 5.371 0.000 1.826
2000 45.816 26.158 3.665 0.000 13.380 2.613 0.000 2.613 2.613 0.000 0.000 0.000
2001 2.752 2.158 0.220 0000 0.000 0.374 0.000 0.374 0.374 0.000 0.000 0.000
5300.000 1500.000 1862.597 1131.851

The case for an integrated producer is an easier case since the producer can only take cost depletion.

Figure 2 Depletion allowance calculation. Note that remaining reserves (U) are end of year. In cost depletion calculation, S = sales during year. (After [1].)

Calculating allowable depletion[edit]

Determining the allowable depletion deduction is probably the most difficult calculation. Figure 2 is intended to help with this calculation. As shown in Figure 2, allowable depletion is the greater of cost depletion or percentage depletion. Cost depletion is calculated by taking the remaining depletable basis (unrecovered G & G costs and lease bonus) and multiplying by the fraction of the remaining reserves produced during the year (production during the year divided by reserves at the beginning of the year). All producers are eligible for cost depletion. Independent producers and royalty owners are also eligible for percentage depletion. Percentage depletion is the lesser of 15% of gross income or 100% of taxable income before depletion from the property. Prior to January 1, 1991, the Taxable Income limitation was 50% for each property. This change is the result of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990. This recent change also demonstrates the “dynamics” of tax rules and the importance of seeking professional advice in this area. An example of another complication in the tax law is the 65% of taxable income limitation from all sources (not just limited to the producing property). The 65% taxable income limit from all sources is difficult to apply to single project economics and is ignored in the example problems presented.

References[edit]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Thompson, R. S., Wright, J. D., 1985, Oil property evaluation, 2nd ed.: Golden, CO, Thompson-Wright Associates, 212 p.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Thompson, R. S., Wright, J. D., 1992, Oil and gas property evaluation, 3rd ed.: Golden, CO, Thompson-Wright Associates, in prep.
  3. Thompson, R. S., 1987, Impact of the new tax law on internal cash flow generation: Dallas, TX, 1987 SPE Hydrocarbon and Economics Symposium, SPE Paper 16309, p. 161–172.
  4. ErnstYoung1990, Oil and gas federal income taxation, p. 158–163.

External links[edit]

find literature about
Taxes
Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Google button.png