Changes

==GOM basin example==

==GOM basin example==

In the GOM basin, variations in well-log response and biofacies distribution are analyzed for recognition of stacked depositional sequences. The gamma-ray log display provides a measure of sediment type, with curve deflections to the left suggesting increased sand content while high values to the right indicate increases in clay content. Use of multiple logs, especially spontaneous potential, resistivity, density, and velocity logs calibrated by well-cutting descriptions and formation microscanner displays, provides a data set for reliable rock type identification. The figure below illustrates an interpretation template for log motif analysis.

In the GOM basin, variations in well-log response and biofacies distribution are analyzed for recognition of stacked depositional sequences. The [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma-ray]] log display provides a measure of sediment type, with curve deflections to the left suggesting increased sand content while high values to the right indicate increases in clay content. Use of multiple logs, especially [[Basic open hole tools#Spontaneous potential|spontaneous potential]], resistivity, density, and velocity logs calibrated by well-cutting descriptions and formation microscanner displays, provides a data set for reliable rock type identification. The figure below illustrates an interpretation template for log motif analysis.

Patterns of forestepping vs. backstepping log-motif funnels can define transgressive vs. regressive depositional trends and candidate systems tracts and sequences. Vail and Wornardt<ref name=ch04r101>Vail, P., R., Wornardt, W., W., 1990, Well log seismic stratigraphy: a new tool for exploration in the '90s: Proceedings, Gulf Coast Section SEPM 11th Annual Research conference, p. 379–388.</ref> and Armentrout et al.<ref name=ch04r8>Armentrout, J., M., 1993, Relative seal-level variations and fault-salt response: offshore Texas examples: Proceedings, Gulf Coast Section SEPM 14th Annual Research Conference, p. 1–7.</ref> detail the process.

Patterns of forestepping vs. backstepping log-motif funnels can define transgressive vs. regressive depositional trends and candidate systems tracts and sequences. Vail and Wornardt<ref name=ch04r101>Vail, P., R., Wornardt, W., W., 1990, Well log seismic stratigraphy: a new tool for exploration in the '90s: Proceedings, Gulf Coast Section SEPM 11th Annual Research conference, p. 379–388.</ref> and Armentrout et al.<ref name=ch04r8>Armentrout, J., M., 1993, Relative seal-level variations and fault-salt response: offshore Texas examples: Proceedings, Gulf Coast Section SEPM 14th Annual Research Conference, p. 1–7.</ref> detail the process.