Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- ...common source rock evaluation errors made by geologists during prospect or play appraisals]: AAPG Bulletin, vol. 93, issue 3, pp. 341-356.</ref>]] ...own on [[Van Krevelen diagram]]s, but it lies below the [[type III kerogen|type III]] pathway.<ref name=Petersetal_2012>Peters, Kenneth E., David J. Curry,1 KB (185 words) - 21:11, 6 July 2015
- ...common source rock evaluation errors made by geologists during prospect or play appraisals]: AAPG Bulletin, vol. 93, issue 3, pp. 341-356.</ref>]] ...Geochemistry, v. 10, p. 499-516, doi: 10.1016/0146-6380(86)90049-5.</ref> type IIS pathway on [[Van Krevelen diagram]]s.<ref name=Petersetal_2012>Peters,1 KB (205 words) - 21:10, 6 July 2015
- ...common source rock evaluation errors made by geologists during prospect or play appraisals]: AAPG Bulletin, vol. 93, issue 3, pp. 341-356.</ref>]] ...ite]] [[maceral]]s; common in both [[marine]] and [[lacustrine]] settings; type I pathway on [[Van Krevelen diagram]]s.<ref name=Petersetal_2012>Peters, Ke1 KB (176 words) - 21:06, 6 July 2015
- ...common source rock evaluation errors made by geologists during prospect or play appraisals]: AAPG Bulletin, vol. 93, issue 3, pp. 341-356.</ref>]] ...ite]] and [[sporinite]]; common but not restricted to [[marine]] settings; Type II pathway on [[Van Krevelen diagram]]s.<ref name=Petersetal_2012>Peters, K1 KB (181 words) - 21:10, 6 July 2015
- ...common source rock evaluation errors made by geologists during prospect or play appraisals]: AAPG Bulletin, vol. 93, issue 3, pp. 341-356.</ref>]] ...]] [[maceral]]s; common but not restricted to paralic [[marine]] settings; type III pathway on [[Van Krevelen diagram]]s.<ref name=Petersetal_2012>Peters,1 KB (180 words) - 21:11, 6 July 2015
- ...common source rock evaluation errors made by geologists during prospect or play appraisals]: AAPG Bulletin, vol. 93, issue 3, pp. 341-356.</ref>]] ...ype I kerogen|I]], [[Type II kerogen|II]], [[Type III kerogen|III]], and [[Type IV kerogen|IV]]. More common is the pseudo-Van Krevelen diagram, where [[Ro1 KB (194 words) - 15:46, 8 March 2016
- ==Play types== ...tratigraphic-traps_fig21-14.png|{{figure number|1}}Different stratigraphic play types in the context of sequence stratigraphy. Modified. Copyright: Passive4 KB (486 words) - 14:57, 4 February 2022
- ...ent explanation of the mechanics or tectonics responsible for creating the play. Such explanations can be any of the following: ...nt(s) occurred. Determine if your concept of the structural genesis of the play on the local scale is consistent with these regional scale models. Also con5 KB (738 words) - 15:58, 2 February 2022
- ...e clearly separate the petroleum system from the sedimentary basin and the play and prospect, the meaning of these words needs to be clarified with respect ...he discovered petroleum occurrences. If an exploratory well encounters any type or amount of petroleum, that petroleum is part of a petroleum system.6 KB (932 words) - 20:24, 25 January 2022
- ...hic units. Note the interval commonly drilled in the Offshore Mancos Shale play. Modified from Hart<ref name=Hart>Hart, B. S., 2021, Stratigraphy and Hydro ...r more than 70 years. [[:file:Figure1MancosCommRept.jpg|Figure 1]] shows a type log through the Cretaceous section of the San Juan Basin.6 KB (985 words) - 20:14, 2 June 2021
- ...aspects of a structural play. These cover a broad range, both in scale and type, from [[plate tectonic studies]] to microscopic examination of [[Petrofabri1 KB (182 words) - 17:24, 2 February 2022
- ==Play== ...thout any particular petroleum system in mind. For example, if a prospect (play) is identified near a series of oil fields in anticlinal traps, it could be8 KB (1,240 words) - 20:43, 25 January 2022
- Visualizing an [[accumulation]] is the key to exploring for any type of trap. The explorer must have a mental image constantly before him to max ...ther part of the world, we can develop the critical elements of a specific play, which in turn lead to discovery.3 KB (498 words) - 16:03, 18 February 2022
- ...akken, which average approximately 11% total organic carbon and consist of type-II kerogen. The primary reservoir targets are low-porosity and low-permeabi ==Play Summary==11 KB (1,595 words) - 20:20, 2 June 2021
- ...y footprint, elevation contours, and thickness contours for the Eagle Ford play in southwest Texas. Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Drilli ...Eagle Ford also contains source potential. It is calcareous in much of the play area, but contains more siliciclastic material moving southwest to northeas11 KB (1,594 words) - 19:15, 8 February 2024
- ...Eagle Ford also contains source potential. It is calcareous in much of the play area, but contains more siliciclastic material moving southwest to northeas ...inputs. The organic matter is mainly represented by oil-prone Type II and Type II-S kerogens (French et al., 2020 and references therein). Production tren10 KB (1,550 words) - 21:50, 3 March 2022
- ...geochemistry, organic matter in the New Albany Shale belongs to oil-prone type II kerogen, but petrographic studies suggest that it is composed of organic ...tly lower [3, 8]. The New Albany Shale was historically exploited as a gas play. Four wells drilled and completed by Endeavor Energy Resources LP and two w7 KB (1,107 words) - 21:50, 4 March 2022
- ...fe of the field. Reservoir performance affects the economic viability of a play or prospect and is a function of reservoir system quality. Performance is e # Determine pore type for each flow unit in the key well using [[core description]]s, [[Thin sect4 KB (547 words) - 18:09, 1 April 2022
- * Nearby acreage availability (to extend play) * Anticipated pay type(s) (e.g., oil, gas, CO<sub>2</sub>)6 KB (779 words) - 15:09, 24 January 2022
- The first factor to be assessed in an exploration play in an area yet to be drilled is whether a source rock is present. If so, th ! Type || Definition4 KB (569 words) - 21:38, 4 February 2022