Difference between revisions of "Natural hydraulic fracturing example, North Sea"

From AAPG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Initial import)
 
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
  | part    = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
 
  | part    = Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
 
  | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal
 
  | chapter = Evaluating top and fault seal
  | frompg  = 10-1
+
  | frompg  = 10-61
  | topg    = 10-94
+
  | topg    = 10-61
 
  | author  = Grant M. Skerlec
 
  | author  = Grant M. Skerlec
 
  | link    = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch10/ch10.htm
 
  | link    = http://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/beaumont/ch10/ch10.htm
Line 16: Line 16:
 
==Trap description==
 
==Trap description==
  
A trap in the Central Graben, North Sea, appears to have been bled dry by natural hydraulic fracturing. This trap is a low-relief salt structure with a dry hole and has less-than-sufficient strain to fracture the top seal.
+
A [[trap]] in the [[Central graben]], [[North Sea]], appears to have been bled dry by [[Natural hydraulic fracturing of top seals|natural hydraulic fracturing]]. This trap is a low-relief [[salt structure]] with a [[dry hole]] and has less-than-sufficient [[strain]] to [[fracture]] the top [[seal]].
  
 
==Evidence==
 
==Evidence==
 +
 +
[[file:evaluating-top-and-fault-seal_fig10-44.png|300px|thumb|{{figure number|1}}Pore pressure is close to the fracture pressure at the base of the top seal. Copyright: Esso Exploration and Production, U.K.]]
 +
 
Evidence for hydraulic fracturing and seal rupture include the following:
 
Evidence for hydraulic fracturing and seal rupture include the following:
  
* A fossil oil—water contact exists at the synclinal spill point of the trap. The trap was once filled with hydrocarbon, but something happened after trap fill to bleed off hydrocarbons.
+
* A fossil [[oil—water contact]] exists at the [[Syncline|synclinal]] [[spill point]] of the trap. The trap was once filled with [[hydrocarbon]], but something happened after trap fill to bleed off hydrocarbons.
* Hydrocarbon shows exist throughout the sediment column above the reservoir. These hydrocarbons are direct evidence of a breached top seal.
+
* Hydrocarbon [[Show evaluation|shows]] exist throughout the sediment column above the [[reservoir]]. These hydrocarbons are direct evidence of a breached top seal.
* The pore pressure is close to the theoretical fracture pressure. In adjacent fields, the pore pressure is significantly less than P<sub>f</sub>.
+
* The [http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Terms/p/pore_pressure.aspx pore pressure] is close to the theoretical [[fracture pressure]], P<sub>f</sub>. In adjacent fields, the pore pressure is significantly less than P<sub>f</sub>.
* Cores show vertical, open extension fractures rather than the more common shear fractures found in adjacent fields. These fractures are identical to fractures produced by hydraulic fracturing.
+
* Cores show vertical, open [[extension fracture]]s rather than the more common [[shear fracture]]s found in adjacent fields. These fractures are identical to fractures produced by hydraulic fracturing.
 
 
Figure 10-44 shows that the pore pressure is close to the fracture pressure at the base of the top seal (approximately [[depth::1300 ft]]). The pore pressure is inferred from mud weight and RFT measurements (solid dots). Leak-off tests (LOT) help constrain the fracture pressure. The fracture pressure is close to the lithostatic pressure or overburden pressure.
 
  
[[file:evaluating-top-and-fault-seal_fig10-44.png|thumb|{{figure number|10-44}}. Copyright: Esso Exploration and Production, U.K.]]
+
[[:file:evaluating-top-and-fault-seal_fig10-44.png|Figure 1]] shows that the pore pressure is close to the fracture pressure at the base of the top seal (approximately [[depth::1300 ft]]). The pore pressure is inferred from mud weight and [[Wireline formation testers|repeat formation tester]] (RFT) measurements (solid dots). [http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Terms.aspx?LookIn=term%20name&filter=leakoff%20test Leak-off tests] (LOT) help constrain the fracture pressure. The fracture pressure is close to the [[Geostatic and lithostatic pressure|lithostatic pressure]] or overburden pressure.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
* [[Overpressure and natural hydraulic fracturing]]
 
 
* [[Natural hydraulic fracturing of top seals]]
 
* [[Natural hydraulic fracturing of top seals]]
 
* [[Fracture threshold in the real world]]
 
* [[Fracture threshold in the real world]]
Line 43: Line 43:
 
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]]  
 
[[Category:Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps]]  
 
[[Category:Evaluating top and fault seal]]
 
[[Category:Evaluating top and fault seal]]
 +
[[Category:Treatise Handbook 3]]

Latest revision as of 19:46, 30 March 2022

Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps
Series Treatise in Petroleum Geology
Part Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
Chapter Evaluating top and fault seal
Author Grant M. Skerlec
Link Web page
Store AAPG Store

Trap description

A trap in the Central graben, North Sea, appears to have been bled dry by natural hydraulic fracturing. This trap is a low-relief salt structure with a dry hole and has less-than-sufficient strain to fracture the top seal.

Evidence

Figure 1 Pore pressure is close to the fracture pressure at the base of the top seal. Copyright: Esso Exploration and Production, U.K.

Evidence for hydraulic fracturing and seal rupture include the following:

  • A fossil oil—water contact exists at the synclinal spill point of the trap. The trap was once filled with hydrocarbon, but something happened after trap fill to bleed off hydrocarbons.
  • Hydrocarbon shows exist throughout the sediment column above the reservoir. These hydrocarbons are direct evidence of a breached top seal.
  • The pore pressure is close to the theoretical fracture pressure, Pf. In adjacent fields, the pore pressure is significantly less than Pf.
  • Cores show vertical, open extension fractures rather than the more common shear fractures found in adjacent fields. These fractures are identical to fractures produced by hydraulic fracturing.

Figure 1 shows that the pore pressure is close to the fracture pressure at the base of the top seal (approximately depth::1300 ft). The pore pressure is inferred from mud weight and repeat formation tester (RFT) measurements (solid dots). Leak-off tests (LOT) help constrain the fracture pressure. The fracture pressure is close to the lithostatic pressure or overburden pressure.

See also

External links

find literature about
Natural hydraulic fracturing example, North Sea
Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Google button.png