Difference between revisions of "Weyburn field location and trap problem"

From AAPG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
==Weyburn trap problem==
 
==Weyburn trap problem==
−
To determine the trap type of Weyburn field, we have to know what forms the lateral closure. It is not structural because dip is homoclinal to the southwest. The field lies southeast of the truncation edge of the Midale member, where it wedges out beneath Triassic rocks and above older Mississippian rocks. Early workers understood this truncation to be the cause of the trap. Yet there is an area lying downdip from the truncation edge of the Midale and updip from the oil pool in which porous Midale Vuggy rocks were present but tested wet with shows of oil.
+
To determine the trap type of Weyburn field, we have to know what forms the lateral closure. It is not structural because dip is homoclinal to the southwest. The field lies southeast of the truncation edge of the Midale Member, where it wedges out beneath Triassic rocks and above older Mississippian rocks. Early workers understood this truncation to be the cause of the trap. Yet there is an area lying downdip from the truncation edge of the Midale and updip from the oil pool in which porous Midale vuggy rocks were present but tested wet with shows of oil.
  
−
This raises the possibility that either a stratigraphic change;<ref name=ch09r70>Winland, H. D., 1972, Oil accumulation in response to pore size changes, Weyburn field, Saskatchewan: Amoco Production Company Report F72-G-25, 20 p. (unpublished).</ref><ref name=ch09r71>Winland, H. D., 1976, Evaluation of gas slippage and pore aperture size in carbonate and sandstone reservoirs: Amoco Production Company Report F76-G-5, 25 p. (unpublished).</ref> Wegelin, 1986; <ref name=ch09r33>Kent, D. M., Haidl, F. M., MacEachern, J. A., 1988, Mississippian oil fields in the northern Williston Basin, in Goolsby, S., M., Longman, M., W., eds., Occurrence and Petrophysical Properties of Carbonate Reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain Region: RMAG Symposium, p. 193–210.</ref> or [[hydrodynamics]]<ref name=ch09r43>Petroleum Research Corporation, 1961, Hydrodynamic exploration for unconformity traps: Research Report A-11, 47 p. (unpublished report, available at Colorado School of Mines Library, Golden, CO).</ref><ref name=ch09r13>Dahlberg, E., C., 1982, Applied [[Hydrodynamics]] in Petroleum Exploration: New York, Springer Verlag, 161 p.</ref><ref name=ch09r24>Hannon, N., 1987, Subsurface water flow patterns in the Canadian sector of the Williston Basin: RMAG 1987 Symposium Guidebook, p. 313–321.</ref> or perhaps both provide the updip, transverse (“lateral”) seal. From producing wells at Weyburn and nearby Steelman, the oil column height appears to be [[length::600 ft]] [[depth::(183 m]]). This raises the next question: Could the Midale Marly beds provide a seal for a 600-ft oil column, or must hydrodynamics be present to augment the seal quality of the Midale Marly beds?
+
This raises the possibility that either a stratigraphic change;<ref name=ch09r70>Winland, H. D., 1972, Oil accumulation in response to pore size changes, Weyburn field, Saskatchewan: Amoco Production Company Report F72-G-25, 20 p. (unpublished).</ref><ref name=ch09r71>Winland, H. D., 1976, Evaluation of gas slippage and pore aperture size in carbonate and sandstone reservoirs: Amoco Production Company Report F76-G-5, 25 p. (unpublished).</ref> Wegelin, 1986; <ref name=ch09r33>Kent, D. M., Haidl, F. M., MacEachern, J. A., 1988, Mississippian oil fields in the northern Williston Basin, in Goolsby, S., M., Longman, M., W., eds., Occurrence and Petrophysical Properties of Carbonate Reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain Region: RMAG Symposium, p. 193–210.</ref> or [[hydrodynamics]]<ref name=ch09r43>Petroleum Research Corporation, 1961, Hydrodynamic exploration for unconformity traps: Research Report A-11, 47 p. (unpublished report, available at Colorado School of Mines Library, Golden, CO).</ref><ref name=ch09r13>Dahlberg, E., C., 1982, Applied [[Hydrodynamics]] in Petroleum Exploration: New York, Springer Verlag, 161 p.</ref><ref name=ch09r24>Hannon, N., 1987, Subsurface water flow patterns in the Canadian sector of the Williston Basin: RMAG 1987 Symposium Guidebook, p. 313–321.</ref> or perhaps both provide the updip, transverse (lateral) seal. From producing wells at Weyburn and nearby Steelman, the oil column height appears to be [[length::600 ft]] [[depth::(183 m]]). This raises the next question: Could the Midale marly beds provide a seal for a 600-ft oil column, or must hydrodynamics be present to augment the seal quality of the Midale marly beds?
  
 
==Weyburn structure map==
 
==Weyburn structure map==

Revision as of 20:39, 30 October 2014

Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps
Series Treatise in Petroleum Geology
Part Predicting the occurrence of oil and gas traps
Chapter Predicting reservoir system quality and performance
Author Dan J. Hartmann, Edward A. Beaumont
Link Web page
Store AAPG Store

Petroleum geology[edit]

Figure 1 Location of Weyburn field. Copyright: Coalson et al.;[1] courtesy RMAG.

Weyburn field, in the Williston basin of Saskatchewan, produces oil from the Midale Member of the Mississippian Mission Canyon Formation.[2]

Weyburn has ultimate recoverable reserves of about 300 million bbl of oil (48 × 106 m3). The main pay interval is the lower part of the Midale, called the Midale vuggy beds. The Midale vuggy beds underly the Midale marly beds, which produce only minor amounts of oil.

Figure 1 is a map showing the location of Weyburn field.

Weyburn trap problem[edit]

To determine the trap type of Weyburn field, we have to know what forms the lateral closure. It is not structural because dip is homoclinal to the southwest. The field lies southeast of the truncation edge of the Midale Member, where it wedges out beneath Triassic rocks and above older Mississippian rocks. Early workers understood this truncation to be the cause of the trap. Yet there is an area lying downdip from the truncation edge of the Midale and updip from the oil pool in which porous Midale vuggy rocks were present but tested wet with shows of oil.

This raises the possibility that either a stratigraphic change;[3][4] Wegelin, 1986; [5] or hydrodynamics[6][7][8] or perhaps both provide the updip, transverse (lateral) seal. From producing wells at Weyburn and nearby Steelman, the oil column height appears to be length::600 ft depth::(183 m). This raises the next question: Could the Midale marly beds provide a seal for a 600-ft oil column, or must hydrodynamics be present to augment the seal quality of the Midale marly beds?

Weyburn structure map[edit]

Figure 2 Structure map of the Weyburn field area, contoured on top of the Mississippian Midale Member. Copyright: Winland;[3] courtesy Amoco Production Co.

Figure 2 is a structure map of the Weyburn field area, contoured on top of the Mississippian Midale Member. The map also shows the northern erosional limit of the Midale evaporite and the location of the field. Circles indicate cores studied.

Weyburn diagrammatic cross section[edit]

Figure 3 Diagrammatic dip-oriented cross section of Weyburn field.

Figure 3 is a diagrammatic dip-oriented cross section of Weyburn field. It shows the truncation of the Midale marly and vuggy beds and the updip facies change in the Midale vuggy beds from a vuggy grainstone to a vuggy mudstone to an anhydrite.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ↑ Coalson, E. B., S. M. Goolsby, and M. H. Franklin, 1994, Subtle seals and fluid-flow barriers in carbonate rocks, in J. C. Dolson, M. L. Hendricks, and W. A. Wescott, eds., Unconformity Related Hydrocarbons in Sedimentary Sequences: RMAG Guidebook for Petroleum Exploration and Exploitation in Clastic and Carbonate Sediments, p. 45–58.
  2. ↑ Chetin, A., K., Fitkin, W., W., 1959, Geology of the Weyburn field, Saskatchewan: Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin, December, p. 751–761.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Winland, H. D., 1972, Oil accumulation in response to pore size changes, Weyburn field, Saskatchewan: Amoco Production Company Report F72-G-25, 20 p. (unpublished).
  4. ↑ Winland, H. D., 1976, Evaluation of gas slippage and pore aperture size in carbonate and sandstone reservoirs: Amoco Production Company Report F76-G-5, 25 p. (unpublished).
  5. ↑ Kent, D. M., Haidl, F. M., MacEachern, J. A., 1988, Mississippian oil fields in the northern Williston Basin, in Goolsby, S., M., Longman, M., W., eds., Occurrence and Petrophysical Properties of Carbonate Reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain Region: RMAG Symposium, p. 193–210.
  6. ↑ Petroleum Research Corporation, 1961, Hydrodynamic exploration for unconformity traps: Research Report A-11, 47 p. (unpublished report, available at Colorado School of Mines Library, Golden, CO).
  7. ↑ Dahlberg, E., C., 1982, Applied Hydrodynamics in Petroleum Exploration: New York, Springer Verlag, 161 p.
  8. ↑ Hannon, N., 1987, Subsurface water flow patterns in the Canadian sector of the Williston Basin: RMAG 1987 Symposium Guidebook, p. 313–321.

External links[edit]

find literature about
Weyburn field location and trap problem 		Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Google button.png

barrels

Retrieved from "https://wiki.aapg.org/index.php?title=Weyburn_field_location_and_trap_problem&oldid=16302"