Difference between revisions of "Stratigraphically complex fields"

	Development Geology Reference Manual
Series	Methods in Exploration
Part	Geological methods
Chapter	Evaluating stratigraphically complex fields
Author	Diana Morton-Thompson, W. E. Galloway
Link	Web page
Store	AAPG Store

Revision as of 19:46, 20 January 2014

Stratigraphically complex fields are those that exhibit a high degree of vertical and lateral heterogeneity that is directly controlled by the environment of deposition (Table 1). This heterogeneity occurs at all scales (see Geological heterogeneities). It can result in a highly variable distribution of rock properties within one reservoir and the division of a single stratigraphic interval into multiple reservoirs that act as independent, self-contained compartments.

Degree of hetrogeneity[edit]

**Table 1** Tentative, relative depositional heterogeneity ranking of reservoir facies based primarily on Texas petroleum fields
Depositional Environment	Heterogeneity Rank
Siliciclastic Systems
Submarine slope/fan/canyon fill, silty to muddy	9.0
Braided streams	8.0
Fine-grained meander belt	8.0
Tidal flat and estuary	8.0
Back barrier apron and tidal delta	8.0
Fluvial or deltaic sandstone on carbonate shelf	8.0
Alluvial fan	7.5
Fluvial-dominated delta	7.5
Coarse-grained meander belt	7.0
Fan delta	7.0
Shelf sandstones	7.0
Submarine slope/fan/canyon fill, sandy	7.0
Lacustrine shore zone and delta	6.0
Barrier shoreface	6.0
Eolian	4.5
Wave-modified delta	4.5
Wave-dominated delta	3.0
Strandplain, sandy	2.5
Barrier core	2.0
Carbonate Systems
Evaporitic flats (sabkhas)	9.0
Restricted platform, shoaling cycles, dolomitized	8.5
Open shelves, extensive diagenesis	8.0
Shelf edge reefs, drapes	8.0
Shelf edge, slope or basinal	8.0
Karstic unconformity zones	8.0
Open shelves, platforms or ramps	7.0
Small atolls, pinnacle reefs	7.0
Oolitic bars and barriers	6.0
Large atolls, pinnacle reefs	5.0

It is important to identify stratigraphic complexities early in field development so that (1) operations can be tailored to optimize recovery and (2) data necessary to properly characterize and manage the reservoir throughout its life can be obtained. It is also important to recognize stratigraphic complexities in mature fields because these fields offer the opportunity for significant improvements in production with relatively low risk.

Identification[edit]

Many criteria exist for recognizing stratigraphic complexities in new fields versus mature fields.

New fields[edit]

High degree of lithological variation seen in cuttings and core.
Small scale depositional packages
Vertical and lateral changes in wireline log character
Questionable correlation of depositional packages between wells
Presence of numerous vertical permeability barriers at a variety of scales
Complex porosity-permeability and capillary pressure relationships (a broad scatter in the data indicates different lithofacies and pore types)
Anomalous changes in pressure gradient
Variable oil and water chemical composition

Mature fields[edit]

Multiple fluid contacts at different structural elevations
Irregular reservoir distribution (such as a dry hole surrounded by producers)
Anomalous fluid relationships (such as a gas zone underlying an oil zone or an oil zone downdip of water)
Irregular and/or highly directional waterflood response
Poor injection profiles indicating irregular and poor waterflood sweep efficiency
Selective changes in produced oil and water chemical composition
Erratic pressures
Highly variable cumulative productions
Anomalous recovery factors
Variable GOR (adjusted to standard operating conditions)
Difficulty in history matching reservoir simulation models with actual production

Problems[edit]

Problems associated with a stratigraphically complex field include difficulties in (1) drilling and completion and (2) reservoir characterization and management.

Drilling and completion problems[edit]

A variety of mud weights and types are needed to prevent formation damage in different producing zones.
Various stimulation treatments must be designed to optimize production for different stratigraphic zones or areas of the field.
Multiple completions and/or selective injection equipment are required.

Reservoir characterization and management problems[edit]

Correlations that subdivide the reservoir into meaningful producing zones must be consistent.
Maps must be generated that portray complex three-dimensional reservoir geometry.
The amount and type of pay in infill locations must be predicted.
Three-dimensional conductivity and “tracking” fluid flow must be understood.
Production or injection volumes need to be allocated to different zones or patterns.

Evaluation[edit]

Figure 1 Example of electrofacies map showing distribution of SP log patterns. (From ^[1].)

Recognition and three-dimensional characterization of reservoir heterogeneity in a stratigraphically complex field requires a well-by-well analysis of the following:

Lithological information
Fluid types and saturations
Production history

Because of the inherent geological variability and the diverse developmental histories of different reservoirs, no one approach to reservoir characterization is universally applicable. Rather, evaluation must be tailored to integrate and maximize the use of all available geological, geophysical, geochemical, and engineering data.

The following steps outline a generalized plan for evaluating a stratigraphically complex field.

Understand the basic regional and local geological setting.
Describe lithofacies and interpreted depositional environment(s) (see “Lithofacies and Environmental Analysis of Clastic Depositional Systems”).
Determine the relationship between lithofacies/depositional environment and reservoir distribution and quality.
Determine reservoir distribution.
Determine reservoir quality
Determine hydrocarbon occurrence
Integrate reservoir distribution, quality, and hydrocarbon maps with production histories and geochemical data.
Run reservoir simulation models to predict reservoir performance.
Use reservoir simulation model to manage field.
Refine reservoir description and calibrate reservoir simulation model.

References[edit]

↑ Galloway, W. E., Cheng, E. S. S., 1985, Reservoir facies architecture in a microtidal barrier system—Frio Formation, Texas Gulf Coast: The University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, Report of Investigations, v. 144, 36 p.

External links[edit]

find literature about
Stratigraphically complex fields

[pt06r35-1] Galloway, W. E., Cheng, E. S. S., 1985, Reservoir facies architecture in a microtidal barrier system—Frio Formation, Texas Gulf Coast: The University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, Report of Investigations, v. 144, 36 p.

[1]

@@ Line 169: / Line 169: @@
 ==Evaluation==
+[[file:evaluating-stratigraphically-complex-fields_fig1.png|thumb|{{figure number|1}}Example of electrofacies map showing distribution of SP log patterns. (From <ref name=pt06r35>Galloway, W. E., Cheng, E. S. S., 1985, Reservoir facies architecture in a microtidal barrier system—Frio Formation, Texas Gulf Coast: The University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, Report of Investigations, v. 144, 36 p.</ref>.)]]
 Recognition and three-dimensional characterization of reservoir heterogeneity in a stratigraphically complex field requires a well-by-well analysis of the following:
@@ Line 190: / Line 192: @@
 * Use reservoir simulation model to manage field.
 * Refine reservoir description and calibrate reservoir simulation model.
-[[file:evaluating-stratigraphically-complex-fields_fig1.png|thumb|{{figure number|1}}Example of electrofacies map showing distribution of SP log patterns. (From <ref name=pt06r35>Galloway, W. E., Cheng, E. S. S., 1985, Reservoir facies architecture in a microtidal barrier system—Frio Formation, Texas Gulf Coast: The University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, Report of Investigations, v. 144, 36 p.</ref>.)]]
 ==See also==