Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • File:Borehole-gravity fig1.png
    ...y between 6330 and 6370 ft is caused by porosity not detected by the gamma-gamma density log. The broader difference anomaly observed over the length of the
    (933 × 1,451 (17 KB)) - 15:41, 14 January 2014
  • File:Rate-of-penetration fig2.png
    Example of correlating ROP with gamma ray curves.
    (954 × 1,212 (89 KB)) - 17:58, 14 January 2014
  • File:M106Ch07Fig04.jpg
    ...alues of greater than 1–2%, depending on the degree of thermal maturation. Gamma-ray values in some wells have been adjusted according to offset shale basel
    (564 × 855 (75 KB)) - 20:49, 18 April 2016
  • * [http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/nanz/images/23.htm Gamma-ray and resistivity response]
    419 bytes (57 words) - 15:36, 6 January 2015
  • File:Basic-open-hole-tools fig1.png
    A typical log showing SP, gamma ray, dual Induction, and sonic measurements. Copyright: Schlumberger, 1983.
    (948 × 2,429 (78 KB)) - 18:21, 13 January 2014
  • File:Basic-open-hole-tools fig2.png
    A typical log showing density, compensated neutron, Pe, gamma ray, and caliper measurements. Copyright: Schlumberger, 1983.
    (944 × 2,424 (71 KB)) - 18:21, 13 January 2014
  • ==Outcrop gamma-ray logging==
    3 KB (412 words) - 22:40, 1 February 2022
  • File:Lithofacies-and-environmental-analysis-of-clastic-depositional-systems fig2.png
    Gamma ray correlation (dip section) of a series of prograding shoreface sandstone
    (943 × 448 (16 KB)) - 21:36, 13 January 2014
  • File:M91FG195.JPG
    ...hile (from Beaubouef, 2004). The lower section shows a series of idealized gamma ray logs. Reprinted with permission from the AAPG.
    (800 × 669 (93 KB)) - 15:36, 17 August 2015
  • File:M91FG188.JPG
    ...ska (from Tye et al., 1999). Reprinted with permission from the AAPG. GR = gamma ray. From Shepherd, M., 2009, Deltaic reservoirs, in M. Shepherd, Oil field
    (800 × 385 (54 KB)) - 16:21, 20 August 2015
  • File:M91FG112.JPG
    ...et al., 1999). Reprinted with permission from the Geological Society. GR = Gamma Ray; RFTtrade = Repeat Formation Tester; UKCF = Upper Kimmeridge Clay Forma
    (800 × 856 (118 KB)) - 19:29, 18 August 2015
  • File:M91Ch6FG43.JPG
    Gamma-ray, density, neutron, and sonic log response of a sandstone and shale sequ
    (800 × 827 (107 KB)) - 17:07, 3 June 2015
  • File:Geological-cross-sections fig2.png
    ...ake the cross section more compact. The left track of each log is an SP or gamma ray trace and the right track is a resistivity trace. (From Slatt et al., 1
    (1,921 × 1,041 (171 KB)) - 15:32, 14 January 2014
  • ...P_{\text{c system2}} \left ( \frac{\gamma \cos \Theta \text{ of system1}}{\gamma \cos \Theta \text{ of system2}} \right )</math> ...c res}} = P_{\text{c lab}} \left ( \frac{\gamma \cos \Theta_{\text{res}}}{\gamma \cos \Theta_{\text{lab}}} \right )</math>
    6 KB (850 words) - 17:22, 4 April 2022
  • File:M91Ch11FG72.JPG
    ...rinted with permission from the AAPG. SP = spontaneous potential log; GR = gamma-ray log. Shepherd, M., 2009, Lithofacies maps, in M. Shepherd, Oil field pr
    (800 × 658 (69 KB)) - 15:51, 27 April 2015
  • File:Lithofacies-and-environmental-analysis-of-clastic-depositional-systems fig3.png
    ...of major depositional environments. The curve on the left shows the SP or gamma ray response and the curve on the right shows the relative grain size profi
    (1,950 × 1,563 (201 KB)) - 21:37, 13 January 2014
  • | rowspan = 2 | Correlation || [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|Gamma ray]] | Spectral gamma ray
    10 KB (1,427 words) - 16:26, 18 January 2022
  • ...open hole tools#Resistivity|electric]], [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]], etc.). It is important to realize that a sonic log never goes to the
    2 KB (348 words) - 19:10, 27 January 2022
  • ...e measured using density sonic, neutron, [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]], and [[Basic open hole tools#Resistivity|resistivity logs]]. The tabl | Gamma ray (GR) or uranium (U) || High || High GR caused by U; can be linear with
    5 KB (768 words) - 15:48, 9 February 2022
  • ...nts. (right) Density values measured by the BHGM (left line) and the gamma-gamma tools (right line). Copyright: Rasmussen;<ref name=Rasmussen>Rasmussen, N. ...w is caused by a remote higher [[porosity]] zone not detected by the gamma-gamma density log. The broader difference anomaly observed over the length of the
    11 KB (1,596 words) - 18:08, 24 January 2022
  • :<math>(\rho_{\rm w} - \rho_{\rm h}) \mbox{g} h = \frac{2\gamma \cos \theta}R</math> :<math>h = \frac{\left(\displaystyle\frac{2\gamma \cos \theta} R \right)}{(\rho_{\rm w} - \rho_{\rm h})\mbox{g}}</math>
    3 KB (488 words) - 16:13, 31 March 2022
  • ...s for things, e.g. [[GR]], [[Gamma ray]], [[GR log]] should all point to [[Gamma-ray log]].
    3 KB (435 words) - 19:31, 16 April 2014
  • | [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|Gamma ray]] || 6 || 20 || √ || √ || √ || √ || √ || √ || – || – || | Spectral [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma Ray|GR]] || 6 || 20 || √ || √ || √ || NR || √ || √ || NR || – |
    5 KB (544 words) - 16:27, 18 January 2022
  • ...can include standard measurements of the formation (electric logs such as gamma ray, resistivity, or porosity), drilling parameters (e.g., downhole torque,
    2 KB (206 words) - 21:17, 3 December 2015
  • ...while drilling (MWD) technology provides downhole evaluation of formation gamma ray, resistivity, and [[porosity]] while drilling is in progress. Mechanica ...servoir evaluation in the past 10 years. [[Basic open hole tools#Gammy ray|Gamma ray]], resistivity, and porosity logs obtained during drilling are commonly
    8 KB (1,083 words) - 21:18, 19 January 2022
  • ...y between 6330 and 6370 ft is caused by porosity not detected by the gamma-gamma [[density log]]. The broader difference anomaly observed over the length of ...r poor volume sampling. However, the broad departure of the BHGM and gamma-gamma logs over the depth range of the logged section is typical of a structural
    10 KB (1,517 words) - 15:54, 20 January 2022
  • | Gamma Ray (GR) || Lithology interpretation, shale volume calculation, calculate c [[File:Well_Log_Analysis_Fig-3.png|thumb|300px|Figure 3-The use of gamma ray log to determine the lithology.<ref>Railsback, 2011, Characteristics of
    25 KB (3,679 words) - 21:17, 13 March 2019
  • | Gamma-gamma log || 8 || 20 || 17 || 0.5
    5 KB (720 words) - 18:07, 24 January 2022
  • :<math>\mbox{P}_{\rm c} = \frac{2\gamma \cos \Theta}{\mbox{r}}</math> :<math>\mbox{r} = \frac{2\gamma \cos \Theta}{\mbox{P}_{\rm c}}</math>
    6 KB (898 words) - 16:21, 4 April 2022
  • | Gamma ray ...ces make use of three different physical phenomena: spontaneous potential, gamma rays, and photoelectric effect. Table 2 shows the resolution and applicatio
    23 KB (3,350 words) - 17:26, 18 January 2022
  • ...wise to select the gamma ray from the induction tool as the base log. The gamma ray from the density curve and all curves recorded with the density are the :A core gamma ray can be a valuable aid in establishing depth correlations between core a
    13 KB (2,094 words) - 17:42, 18 January 2022
  • ...source, counts the number of returning gamma rays. The number of returning gamma rays is an indicator of formation bulk density. The litho-density tool (LDT
    12 KB (1,763 words) - 16:18, 5 April 2022
  • * [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|Gamma ray]] ==Gamma ray logs==
    25 KB (3,637 words) - 19:39, 18 January 2022
  • ...otential (SP)]]. The most common methods for estimating shale volumes from gamma ray and SP logs are outlined here. Other measurements can be used under spe ===Shale volume from gamma ray===
    25 KB (3,776 words) - 19:53, 18 January 2022
  • * [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|Gamma-ray]] log changes in response to increased uranium concentration at exposur
    6 KB (862 words) - 15:20, 4 February 2022
  • ...tions and order of logging runs (usually [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]], deep resistivity, [[porosity]], sonic, pad-type resistivity, [[dipme
    6 KB (779 words) - 15:09, 24 January 2022
  • ...on_fig2.png|300px|thumb|{{figure number|2}}Example of correlating ROP with gamma ray curves.]] ...can be used to correlate to nearby wells. This is done by comparing ROP to gamma ray or SP curves ([[:file:rate-of-penetration_fig2.png|Figure 2]]). This co
    7 KB (1,049 words) - 19:02, 20 January 2022
  • ...Such an instrument has either one or two [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma]] ray detectors spaced below the ejector. By various techniques, the operat ...ng_fig3.png|Figure 3]]. The tool is stationary during such a test, and the gamma count rate is recorded at the surface. In [[:file:production-logging_fig3.p
    12 KB (1,726 words) - 16:48, 20 January 2022
  • ...h in calcareous nannoplankton and foraminiferal fossils and having maximum gamma-ray values are interpreted to correlate with condensed depositional interva ...n of stacked depositional sequences. The [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma-ray]] log display provides a measure of sediment type, with curve deflectio
    14 KB (1,901 words) - 15:16, 9 January 2024
  • :<math>\mbox{P}_{\rm d} = \frac{(2\gamma \cos \theta)}{\mbox{R}}</math>
    4 KB (530 words) - 15:56, 31 March 2022
  • * [[Spectral gamma ray]]
    5 KB (543 words) - 23:45, 8 January 2015
  • ...es \mbox{l} \times \sin \mbox{Q} \times (\rho_{\rm w} - \rho_{\rm hc}) > 2\gamma</math>
    4 KB (618 words) - 19:40, 14 February 2022
  • ...ok lithology from logs]]). Commonly, the [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]] log provides the most distinctive log signature for individual facies
    11 KB (1,444 words) - 21:26, 4 January 2024
  • ...te]]s, commonly have the highest gamma ray activity. However, the level of gamma ray activity in some carbonates ([[dolostones]] in particular) is not relat
    23 KB (3,026 words) - 20:48, 19 January 2022
  • ...hole tools#Spontaneous potential|SP]] or [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]] trace and the right track is a resistivity trace. (From Slatt et al.< ...hole tools#Spontaneous potential|SP]] or [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]] log and one [[Basic open hole tools#Resistivity|resistivity log]] are
    20 KB (3,029 words) - 16:09, 24 January 2022
  • ...on well-log traces) occurring above successive, laterally persistent high gamma-ray (or minimum spontaneous potential [SP]) shale markers that are interpre ...jpg|Figure 6]]). Interbedded mudstones displaying thin, spiky, and serrate gamma-ray and SP log motifs accumulated in the interaxial areas where intermitten
    16 KB (2,381 words) - 19:03, 11 March 2019
  • | [[Core gamma scan]] | [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|Gamma ray]] log
    38 KB (5,198 words) - 22:11, 15 January 2024
  • ...crepancies in the core log. Comparison of the core gamma with the wireline gamma log allows the core-to-log shift to be determined. This is important for ma | Gamma ray log || Measures the natural gamma-ray response of the rock || Well-log correlation, lithology identification;
    43 KB (6,686 words) - 13:44, 18 March 2019
  • | Gamma ray || May decrease slightly || May increase slightly
    5 KB (733 words) - 17:57, 17 February 2022
  • :<math>\mbox{P}_{\rm d} = \frac{-2\gamma \cos \theta}{\mbox{r}}</math>
    5 KB (766 words) - 22:55, 2 February 2016
  • ...r depth control and can be of great assistance only if there is sufficient gamma ray activity in the core to provide precise boundaries. Should closely spac
    14 KB (1,893 words) - 20:15, 2 February 2016
  • ...tones containing potassium feldspars or thorium-bearing clays. The natural gamma ray spectra, Pe, density, and neutron expanded response equations can be co * [[Spectral gamma ray]]
    25 KB (3,189 words) - 17:24, 18 January 2022
  • ...Project (EGSP), there is a strong relationship between higher-than-normal gamma ray response and total gas content in the black, organic-rich Marcellus Sha ...ral length of 20,060 ft (Boyer, 2021, Gough, 2020). The organic-rich, high gamma ray portion of the Marcellus Shale is thickest in southwestern and north-ce
    19 KB (2,773 words) - 21:36, 4 March 2022
  • ...tential|spontaneous potential (SP)]] and [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]] curves. Grain size is determined by comparison with a chart made of s
    13 KB (1,786 words) - 20:50, 19 January 2022
  • ...he unconformity. The unconformity may be recognized in well logs by a high gamma ray count due to glauconite or uranium if the unconformity is covered by ma
    7 KB (960 words) - 21:00, 6 April 2022
  • ...cording of the raw dipmeter data showing the orientation curves, calipers, gamma ray, and correlation curves from a six-arm tool. Note that the curves are r ...g4.png|Figure 4]] is a standard arrow plot that also carries a correlation gamma ray curve and maximum and minimum caliper values. On the right-hand side is
    14 KB (2,128 words) - 17:25, 18 January 2022
  • ...y value within the scale of measurement. [[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|Gamma ray]] log values, the porosity or permeability of a rock, or the subsea ele
    16 KB (2,483 words) - 19:28, 19 January 2022
  • ...d logged. The tools can be precisely positioned in zones of interest using gamma logs or SP logs as guides. Percussion or rotary drilled samples provide sma
    7 KB (1,100 words) - 21:16, 19 January 2022
  • ...g shale interval, or called “high quality shale”, is characterized by high gamma ray (GR), high uranium (U), high acoustic (AC) and low density (DEN) (Fig.
    7 KB (985 words) - 18:54, 4 December 2023
  • ...s of greater than 1–2%, depending on the degree of [[thermal maturation]]. Gamma-ray values in some wells have been adjusted according to [[offset]] shale b
    16 KB (2,310 words) - 15:13, 19 January 2017
  • ...n they provide: (1) lithology indicators—[[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|gamma ray]], [[Basic open hole tools#Sonic|sonic]], [[Basic open hole tools#Densi
    18 KB (2,514 words) - 17:47, 21 January 2022
  • ...metrics),<ref name=ch18r11>Curry, W., H., III, 1984, Evaluation of surface gamma radiation surveys for petroleum exploration in the deep Powder River basin,
    10 KB (1,443 words) - 16:08, 25 January 2022
  • ...extreme variations in thickness. Thicknesses ocassionally exceed 100 m. On gamma-ray logs, the M is blocky, with a sharp base and top. On seismic data and i
    9 KB (1,290 words) - 21:18, 19 October 2016
  • ...aubouef<ref name=BB2004 />). The lower section shows a series of idealized gamma ray logs.]] ...eprinted with permission from, and &copy; by, the Geological Society. GR = Gamma Ray; RFTtrade = Repeat Formation Tester; UKCF = Upper Kimmeridge Clay Forma
    20 KB (2,850 words) - 15:33, 15 January 2024
  • ...ssed to produce total intensity [[contour]] maps (with intervals down to 1 gamma and occasionally less) and digital data files. The processing often include
    10 KB (1,481 words) - 15:39, 24 January 2022
  • :<math>\mbox{h} = \frac{0.670 \times \gamma \cos \theta}{\mbox{R}_{\rm bt}(\rho_{\rm w} - \rho_{\rm h})}</math>
    10 KB (1,484 words) - 20:55, 4 December 2023
  • ...t al.<ref name=Hamiltonetal_2002 />). SP = spontaneous potential log; GR = gamma-ray log.]] ...etin, v. 56, no. 8, p. 1541–1544.</ref> For each well, a paper copy of the gamma-ray log is trimmed to the top and base of the reservoir unit of interest an
    21 KB (3,139 words) - 16:54, 6 April 2016
  • .... There are various type of wireline logging: radioactive log, consists of Gamma Ray, Neutron, and Density; electric log, consists of SP and resistivity; ac
    15 KB (2,331 words) - 19:12, 17 April 2019
  • ...here Sand A (clean sandstone) and Sand B (clayey sandstone as indicated by gamma ray log) have different density and wave velocities compared to the claysto
    15 KB (2,356 words) - 18:00, 26 April 2022
  • ...10.jpg|{{Figure number|10}}Type log for Wattenberg Field. Curves shown are gamma ray, spontaneous potential, resistivity, and neutron/density. Black bar in ...0.jpg|{{Figure number|20}}(A) Type log Codell Sandstone, Wattenberg Field. Gamma ray, spontaneous potential, resistivity, neutron, and density curves shown.
    72 KB (10,249 words) - 20:06, 15 January 2024
  • ...ined on the electric logs by repetition or omission of parts of the SP and gamma ray signatures compared to a reference well that is believed to show an unf
    20 KB (2,865 words) - 19:24, 19 January 2022
  • ...particularly in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia, peak gamma-ray counts in excess of 300 to 400 API are not uncommon and reflect the gen ...als. G/C3 = matrix density ρmatrix (in grams per cubic centimeter); GAPI = gamma-ray API units; SEM = scanning electron microscope; TVD = true vertical dept
    89 KB (13,415 words) - 19:16, 16 January 2024
  • ...ace using petrophysical logs (gamma ray, density, sonic etc; Fig. 15). The Gamma ray (GR) log response of dolostone / dolomite-rich carbonates can be lower
    38 KB (4,996 words) - 21:07, 21 April 2022
  • ...ate of penetration (ROP), Weight on bit (WOB), Near-bit inclination (NBI), Gamma Ray (GR) and few other parameters. The sonde GR instrument is often placed
    20 KB (2,916 words) - 21:04, 21 April 2022
  • |Askeladden Gamma
    23 KB (3,382 words) - 18:40, 10 January 2019
  • :<math>\Delta \gamma \times g \times \sin{\alpha}</math>
    29 KB (4,601 words) - 16:09, 12 April 2016
  • ::<math>\sigma_h = k \sigma_v = k \gamma z</math>
    28 KB (4,031 words) - 15:49, 28 November 2022
  • | Magnitude of extension (''&gamma;'', 0-1) || 0.1 || 0.64 || 0.9
    38 KB (5,890 words) - 15:16, 23 August 2016
  • ...ell spacing is large<br>Requires modern log suite ([[Basic open hole tools#Gamma ray|GR]], [[Basic open hole tools#Density|density]], [[Basic open hole tool
    31 KB (4,171 words) - 18:22, 21 January 2022
  • ...ine) occurs as represented on the southern half of cross section A-A’. (C) Gamma Ray–Density-Neutron log across the Wolfcamp C showing a representative sa ...lfcamp in the southern Delaware Basin. (A) Eagle Oil & Gas Co., Sheldon #1 Gamma Ray, Density–Neutron log. The drop in Density–Neutron circled red corre
    157 KB (23,278 words) - 18:36, 16 January 2024
  • ...al lags contain abundant mudclasts, they can be mistaken for shales on the gamma-ray log. Caution should be taken where a shale-like wireline log response i
    32 KB (4,727 words) - 21:03, 15 January 2024
  • ...Prudhoe Bay field, Alaska (from Tye et al.<ref name=Tyeetal_1999 />). GR = gamma ray.]]
    34 KB (4,776 words) - 18:18, 5 January 2024
  • ...gure12.jpeg|Figure 12]]. Tracks (from left to right): stratigraphic Units; gamma ray; thickness reference with dotted lines every 50 m; Passey filter; TOC (
    77 KB (11,201 words) - 20:07, 15 January 2024